Normally, I think Jon Stewart's funny. This time, he's down to the Keith Olbermann level of stupid. If he wasn't so blatantly misinterpreting Laura Bush's words, he'd perhaps see that they make sense.
So what good interpretation is there then?
Iraq. It's great! We've solved all the problems there apart from that one bombing a day that discourages people and makes them think we haven't!
Great.
Now, can we move on to what I was
actually talking about? I would really love it if everyone who responds would stop automatically assuming that I'm Bush's mouthpiece just because I happen to be conservative, and that I'm always defending the war in Iraq. I'm not saying Iraq is at all stable, nor am I defending lying about the current situation.
What I
am on about, is that Jon Stewart wasn't funny. In fact, all he did was take what Laura Bush said about seeing the bombings "on TV" and saying that "well, Laura, they're happening in real life too!" Honestly, that's just screams
no ****, Sherlock, and I frankly think that Laura Bush knows that the bombings are happening in real life too.
...Which is why they might want to split Iraq into three countries... or maybe three semi-independent states. I mean, if they really can't get along...
Actually, a federal republic would work just fine. No splitting necessary.
When you say something stupid like "on TV you see the one bombing a day that discourages people" on national tv, you get what you deserve.
Kosh, I've got some advice: jump off the unnecessary Bush-bashing bandwagon. Bash for when he truly deserves it, not just because some TV comedian gets on and plays around with his wife's words until they say what we wants them to say to get a good laugh out of people.