Now plase, leave this be allready.
First up it is incredibly cowardly to make a point by point dissection of my reply and then try to claim I should leave it alone so as to prevent me replying.
If you want the subject to end I suggest
you stop replying rather than trying to get the last word with underhanded techniques.
I make a conjection based on the teachings of the Churrch and God's past behaviour.
You made a connection which the pope himself has categorically claimed does not exist. That's fine. Faith is a personal matter and you're allowed to invent it any way you see fit but that still does mean that you are saying you have a better understanding of God with respect to the way mankind achieved sapience than the pope has. And for once it would be nice to hear you actually admit that you think you're right and the pope is wrong.
You also seem to forget that evolution is a THEROY that explains a humans biological descent. Wether intelligence is the product of evolution is not proven.....
Gravity is a THEORY.
In science theory is as good as it gets. There is nothing above theory. You need to understand that there is an enormous difference between the scientific meaning of the word theory and it's colloquial use. They do not mean the same thing.
Evidence? Who ever said anything about evidence? I said it's strange.. and it is.
Not really. For 5 billion years there was simply nothing else around to say "hey, isn't it strange that I'm the only thing that can think around here"
And as someone else has pointed out there were other animals around who could think. Like Neanderthals for instance.
So according to you, if I do something once, I should do it all the time, under all circumstances? Such primitive generalizations are below you...
Why are you making one here then? Who said anything about all circumstances? Who said anything about doing it all the time?
You've continually failed to see my point. My point is that it is the height of stupidity ascribe something to the divine intervention of a superior being who you yourself will (hopefully) admit has motives you can't understand and then claim that you understand why or why not he would do something.
Dragging things back to the topic at hand. The Vasudans (for the purposes of this dicussion) exist. They look humanoid. You've claimed God exists and must do for intelligence to exist. How can the Vasudans ever not be believable? At what point would you look at the similarity between the Vasudans and humanity and go "There's no way God could have done that?"
Cause to me that seems like you're actually putting a limit on God's powers.
Your only possible answer is that the Vasudans are believable. Quite why you feel the need to debate the matter is beyond me.