[Grizzly]

Is it just me, or is my nice image in my signature not showing up?

the image is supposed to be this:

[Black Wolf]

Sig images are disabled here, thankfully.

[Fineus]

As Black Wolf said - we've found it easier to disable image signatures as they'd inevitably be abused and don't really serve much of an advantage. You'll have to cope

[haloboy100]

Take it from me -Joshua-, i tried convincing everybody but failed miserably...

[Dark Hunter]

I believe the admins made a good choice in disabling sig pics. I've seen other forums with them (as I believe we all have), and it is extremely annoying to scroll past all these pics that invariably take up far more space than 80% of the messages posted.

[haloboy100]

Like i said before, Those forums could add options to disable viewing of pictures in sigs, but lets not get into that arguement

[Bob-san]

Who cares about images in sigs? Just quote people and make a nice long siggy with lots and lots of text. Images in signatures is about as smart as expecting ice cream to stay frozen on the surface of the sun.

[Polpolion]

Not siggy images makes the pages load quicker, too.

[jr2]

-Joshua-, put this in your siggy:

Code: [Select]

[url=http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d102/dvj4/Ban1337.gif]For the sake of the future...[/url]
which produces:

For the sake of the future...

I think that will be sufficient.  Just add size tags and bold or italic, if you want...

[Turey]

<A Well thought out, excellent point>

Lawl your so stoopid.
<768x768 flashing, bright-colored animated .gif>

I believe that summarizes my position well enough.

[jr2]

BTW, -Josh-, I suppose you've got a problem with shorthand, too, right?