Author Topic: *****-alert!  (Read 72622 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline TrashMan

  • T-tower Avenger. srsly.
  • 213
  • God-Emperor of your kind!
    • FLAMES OF WAR
There is no "Living by the Word" without knowing who Christ is, and there is no knowing who Christ is without calling Him either a lunatic, a demon or Lord.  The first two would give no person a reason to listen to what He has to say.  Therefore, the only people who can possibly get into Heaven are those who are perfect, and those who love Christ.

A few priests I talked to tend to disagree.

Accepting Christ means more than just beliving in Him - it means accepting the good lifestyle. A good, mercifull  and charitable person, wether he actualyl belives in Him or not, is still following Christs teachings (love they neighbour), at least partially.

Now, I'm not saying the belivers and non-belivers would get the same treatement up there. You seem to think of Hell, purgatory and Heaven as being 3 "fixed" places with little varriance in them. IMHO I think there's a lot of varriance in them, so everyone gets EXACTLY what he deserves.
Thus, both of us could be good people, we both belive and then we die.
Wouldn't it make sense that if you were a slightly better person than me, you get a slightly beter treatement? Wouldn't that be just? Thus your Heaven would be slightly better than mine... or something like that.




Thaat said, I myself do look at the universe, it's laws and it's beauty and I simply cannot belive all of it is just there by purce chance.
Nobody dies as a virgin - the life ****s us all!

You're a wrongularity from which no right can escape!

 

Offline Mefustae

  • 210
  • Chevron locked...
Thaat said, I myself do look at the universe, it's laws and it's beauty and I simply cannot belive all of it is just there by purce chance.
So you just throw in the towel, say 'God did it', and sit back with a satisfied grin on your face?

How disappointing.

 

Offline karajorma

  • King Louie - Jungle VIP
  • Administrator
  • 214
    • Karajorma's Freespace FAQ
It's kinda funny how the devout agnostics are the only ones who are right.  Placing all of their beliefs in that no idea can EVER be proven, positive or negative, sounds the most reasonable to me.

That's actually a description of science too.

Quote
Science and religion are both invalid ways to base your life around.  After all, who is man to say God had a son?  Who is man to say God did not?  Who is man to say "I am the son of God"?  Who is man to say "I am not the son of God"?

Face it people, you both fail.

You've of course missed the fact that you can be both agnostic and an atheist/theist. You'd better clarify what you mean by agnosticism before making any further claims as to it's validity.
Karajorma's Freespace FAQ. It's almost like asking me yourself.

[ Diaspora ] - [ Seeds Of Rebellion ] - [ Mind Games ]

 

Offline jr2

  • The Mail Man
  • 212
  • It's prounounced jayartoo 0x6A7232
    • Steam
Hmm, just got up to speed on this... at least I didn't get a headache this time :doubt: .

OK, as far as someone being able to be unconditionally saved, yeah, it's true.  BUT... to be saved, you have to actually mean it when you ask Christ to save you.  Remember, God knows every last thought you have.  If you are trying to get a get out of jail free card, there is a verse for you: "Be not deceived, God is not mocked".  I think it'd be impossible to truly believe and put your trust in Christ to save you for your sins, and then go out and live a life of sin willfully.

And, as far as "blaspheming the Holy Spirit": I can do a bit more research on that, but one of the best explanations I've heard of is that it actually means ignoring the Holy Spirit's call (to salvation) until you die.

OK, I did a bit of checking, here's what I've got:

First, the reference(s):
Quote from: http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke%2012:8-10;&version=31;
Luke 12:8-10
8"I tell you, whoever acknowledges me before men, the Son of Man will also acknowledge him before the angels of God. 9But he who disowns me before men will be disowned before the angels of God. 10And everyone who speaks a word against the Son of Man will be forgiven, but anyone who blasphemes against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven.

Quote from: http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew%2012:31-33;&version=31;
Matthew 12:31-33
 31And so I tell you, every sin and blasphemy will be forgiven men, but the blasphemy against the Spirit will not be forgiven. 32Anyone who speaks a word against the Son of Man will be forgiven, but anyone who speaks against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven, either in this age or in the age to come. 33"Make a tree good and its fruit will be good, or make a tree bad and its fruit will be bad, for a tree is recognized by its fruit.

Now some notes:
Dr. Henry M. Morris, Ph.D.
Matthew
Quote
12:32 not be forgiven him.  The unforgivable sin of speaking against the Holy Spirit has been interpreted in various ways, but the true meaning cannot contradict other Scripture.  It is unequivocally clear that the one unforgivable sin is permanently rejecting Christ (John 3:18; 3:36). Thus, speaking against the Holy Spirit is equivalent to rejecting Christ with such finality that no future repentance is possible.  "My spirit shall not always strive with man," God said long ago (Genesis 6:3). Jesus added: "No man can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw him" (John 6:44). In the context of this particular passage (Matthew 12:22-32), Jesus had performed a great miracle of creation, involving both healing and casting out a demon, but the Pharisees rejected this clear witness of the Holy Spirit.  Instead they attributed His powers to Satan, thus demonstrating an attitude permanently resistant to the Spirit, and to the deity and saving Gospel of Christ.
Dr. John MacArthur, D.D.
Matthew:
Quote
12:31 the blasphemy against the Spirit.  The sin He was confronting was the Pharisees' deliberate rejection of that which they knew to be of God (cf. John 11:48; Acts 4:16). They could not deny the reality of what the Holy Spirit had done through Him, so they attributed to Satan a work that they knew was of God. (v. 24; Mark 3:22)
Quote
12:32 it will be forgiven him.  Someone never exposed to Christ's divine power and presence might reject Him in ignorance and be forgiven -- assuming the unbelief gives way to genuine repentance.  Even a Pharisee such as Saul of Tarsus could be forgiven for speaking "against the Son of Man" or persecuting His followers -- because his unbelief stemmed from ignorance (1 Tim. 1:13).  But those who know His claims are true and reject Him anyway sin "against the Holly Spirit" -- because it is the Holy Spirit who testifies of Christ and makes His truth known to us (John 15:26; 16:14,15).  No forgiveness was possible for these Pharisees who witnessed His miracles first-hand, knew the truth of His claims, and still blasphemed the Holy Spirit -- because they had already rejected the fullest possible revelation.  See notes on Heb 6:4-6; 10:29.
Luke:
Quote
12:10 blasphemes against the Holy Spirit.  This was not a sin of ignorance, but a deliberate, willful, settled hostility toward Christ -- exemplified by the Pharisees in Matt. 12, who attributed to Satan the work of Christ (cf.11:15).
« Last Edit: November 06, 2007, 11:14:09 am by jr2 »

 

Offline TrashMan

  • T-tower Avenger. srsly.
  • 213
  • God-Emperor of your kind!
    • FLAMES OF WAR
Thaat said, I myself do look at the universe, it's laws and it's beauty and I simply cannot belive all of it is just there by purce chance.
So you just throw in the towel, say 'God did it', and sit back with a satisfied grin on your face?

How disappointing.

Threw in the towel? :wtf:
As in giving up? On what?

You're dissapointed? Heh..not my problem. :p
Nobody dies as a virgin - the life ****s us all!

You're a wrongularity from which no right can escape!

 

Offline Asuko

  • 27
  • Angel in conflict
This argument is moot.
This sig is equal to -i.

Free Vasudans! Clicky here!!

Care to kill a flame warâ„¢?

"Is it just me or are the squirrels getting more and more waterlogged?" - Tyr

"THE POWER OF CHRIST COMPELS YOU!" -Me
"Are you trying to exorcise my Rubik's cube?" -Tyrian

"Life's an adventure*plunge*" -Tyrian
"You call plunging a toilet an adventure?" -Me

 

Offline achtung

  • Friendly Neighborhood Mirror Guy
  • 210
  • ****in' Ace
    • Freespacemods.net
There was no real argument in the first place.  :p
FreeSpaceMods.net | FatHax | ??????
In the wise words of Charles de Gaulle, "China is a big country, inhabited by many Chinese."

Formerly known as Swantz

 

Offline Mefustae

  • 210
  • Chevron locked...
Threw in the towel? :wtf:
As in giving up? On what?
Rather than bothering to search for how the universe came into existence, how things evolved and the immutable causes that have created so much around us... you say 'God did it', and that's that. It's disappointing because you lack the drive to find out how we got here, instead choosing a copout answer and putting your feet up like you've accomplished something by coming to this contrived conclusion.

 
JR2, There's that, and there's also the story in Acts where the couple states that they sold their property and gave everything over to God, when in fact they kept a fairly large quantity to themselves, thus they lied to the Holy Spirit about it.

Trashman: I guess this is one place where we somehat drastically differ.  I don't believe in any kind of tiered Heaven or Hell, and I have barely any inklings of understanding or belief in Purgatory, as I haven't read any Scripture on such a place.  Although I haven't exactly read the whole Bible yet.

The Bible does say that a person will get thier reward, what they give up will be given to them 100 fold, what they take will be taken from them 100 fold, but read what Revelation has to say:

Quote
After this I looked and there before me was a great multitude that no one could count, from every nation, tribe, people and language, standing before the throne and in front of the Lamb. They were wearing white robes and were holding palm branches in their hands. And they cried out in a loud voice:
   "Salvation belongs to our God,
   who sits on the throne,
   and to the Lamb." All the angels were standing around the throne and around the elders and the four living creatures. They fell down on their faces before the throne and worshiped God, 12saying:
   "Amen!
   Praise and glory
   and wisdom and thanks and honor
   and power and strength
   be to our God for ever and ever.
   Amen!"

 Then one of the elders asked me, "These in white robes—who are they, and where did they come from?"

 I answered, "Sir, you know."

   And he said, "These are they who have come out of the great tribulation; they have washed their robes and made them white in the blood of the Lamb. Therefore,
   "they are before the throne of God
      and serve him day and night in his temple;
   and he who sits on the throne will spread his tent over them.
 Never again will they hunger;
      never again will they thirst.
   The sun will not beat upon them,
      nor any scorching heat.
 For the Lamb at the center of the throne will be their shepherd;
      he will lead them to springs of living water.
   And God will wipe away every tear from their eyes."  -Revelation 7:9-17

This is what the Bible says about Christians, those who have washed their robes in the blood of the Lamb and made them white.

Now here's what the Bible says about those who are not Christians, and their judgement:

Quote
Then I saw a great white throne and him who was seated on it. Earth and sky fled from his presence, and there was no place for them. And I saw the dead, great and small, standing before the throne, and books were opened. Another book was opened, which is the book of life. The dead were judged according to what they had done as recorded in the books. The sea gave up the dead that were in it, and death and Hades gave up the dead that were in them, and each person was judged according to what he had done. Then death and Hades were thrown into the lake of fire. The lake of fire is the second death. If anyone's name was not found written in the book of life, he was thrown into the lake of fire.

-Revelation 20:11-15

Now you might say, "Well, who's name is in the book of life?"  Read:
Quote
Then I saw a new heaven and a new earth, for the first heaven and the first earth had passed away, and there was no longer any sea. I saw the Holy City, the new Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God, prepared as a bride beautifully dressed for her husband.  And I heard a loud voice from the throne saying, "Now the dwelling of God is with men, and he will live with them. They will be his people, and God himself will be with them and be their God.  He will wipe every tear from their eyes. There will be no more death or mourning or crying or pain, for the old order of things has passed away."

 He who was seated on the throne said, "I am making everything new!" Then he said, "Write this down, for these words are trustworthy and true."

 He said to me: "It is done. I am the Alpha and the Omega, the Beginning and the End. To him who is thirsty I will give to drink without cost from the spring of the water of life. He who overcomes will inherit all this, and I will be his God and he will be my son. But the cowardly, the unbelieving, the vile, the murderers, the sexually immoral, those who practice magic arts, the idolaters and all liars—their place will be in the fiery lake of burning sulfur. This is the second death."

 One of the seven angels who had the seven bowls full of the seven last plagues came and said to me, "Come, I will show you the bride, the wife of the Lamb." And he carried me away in the Spirit to a mountain great and high, and showed me the Holy City, Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God.  It shone with the glory of God, and its brilliance was like that of a very precious jewel, like a jasper, clear as crystal. It had a great, high wall with twelve gates, and with twelve angels at the gates. On the gates were written the names of the twelve tribes of Israel. There were three gates on the east, three on the north, three on the south and three on the west. The wall of the city had twelve foundations, and on them were the names of the twelve apostles of the Lamb.

 The angel who talked with me had a measuring rod of gold to measure the city, its gates and its walls. The city was laid out like a square, as long as it was wide. He measured the city with the rod and found it to be 12,000 stadia in length, and as wide and high as it is long. He measured its wall and it was 144 cubit thick, by man's measurement, which the angel was using. The wall was made of jasper, and the city of pure gold, as pure as glass. The foundations of the city walls were decorated with every kind of precious stone. The first foundation was jasper, the second sapphire, the third chalcedony, the fourth emerald, 20the fifth sardonyx, the sixth carnelian, the seventh chrysolite, the eighth beryl, the ninth topaz, the tenth chrysoprase, the eleventh jacinth, and the twelfth amethyst. The twelve gates were twelve pearls, each gate made of a single pearl. The great street of the city was of pure gold, like transparent glass.

 I did not see a temple in the city, because the Lord God Almighty and the Lamb are its temple. The city does not need the sun or the moon to shine on it, for the glory of God gives it light, and the Lamb is its lamp. The nations will walk by its light, and the kings of the earth will bring their splendor into it. On no day will its gates ever be shut, for there will be no night there. 26The glory and honor of the nations will be brought into it. Nothing impure will ever enter it, nor will anyone who does what is shameful or deceitful, but only those whose names are written in the Lamb's book of life.

-Revelation 21:1-27
Quote from: This thread
Bla bla bla bla bla...
tl;dr.

It's kinda funny how the devout agnostics are the only ones who are right.  Placing all of their beliefs in that no idea can EVER be proven, positive or negative, sounds the most reasonable to me.  Science and religion are both invalid ways to base your life around.  After all, who is man to say God had a son?  Who is man to say God did not?  Who is man to say "I am the son of God"?  Who is man to say "I am not the son of God"?

Face it people, you both fail.
I agree.  Any normal man saying "I am God" or "I am the son of God" would be chalked up as crazy in my book.  However, when one dies, and is indeed most certainly dead, for several days, and then gets up and walks around a bit more, He tends to get a little bit more credibility to me.


Thaat said, I myself do look at the universe, it's laws and it's beauty and I simply cannot belive all of it is just there by purce chance.
So you just throw in the towel, say 'God did it', and sit back with a satisfied grin on your face?

How disappointing.

So you just throw in the towel, say "It's by pure chance," and sit back with a satisfied grin on your face, then mock those who attribute it to a being who is indeed fully capable of doing all that and more?

How very disappointing indeed. 

Do you have any idea how many things in the Universe that scientists know full and well about that just plain simply don’t make sense?  There are more to come.  Even if we did figure out every single law and every single method by which the Universe is run, what then?  The sheer awesomeness of it all will be an even greater testament to the existence of God!  Saying "God made it" is not a copout, but simply a very logical conclusion one can draw based upon what we know to be true as of right now.  I am of the school of thought that science does not attempt to disprove or deny a creator, but rather support His existence.
Could we with ink the ocean fill, and were the skies of parchment made
Were every stalk on earth a quill, and every man a scribe by trade
To write the love of God above, would drain the ocean dry
Nor could the scroll contain the whole, though stretched from sky to sky!

 

Offline Bobboau

  • Just a MODern kinda guy
    Just MODerately cool
    And MODest too
  • 213
so your a complete moron who thinks that if something is not directed by intelligence it's complete chance, how dis... actually I'm used to it.
Bobboau, bringing you products that work... in theory
learn to use PCS
creator of the ProXimus Procedural Texture and Effect Generator
My latest build of PCS2, get it while it's hot!
PCS 2.0.3


DEUTERONOMY 22:11
Thou shalt not wear a garment of diverse sorts, [as] of woollen and linen together

 

Offline achtung

  • Friendly Neighborhood Mirror Guy
  • 210
  • ****in' Ace
    • Freespacemods.net
INTELLIGENT DESIGN!
FreeSpaceMods.net | FatHax | ??????
In the wise words of Charles de Gaulle, "China is a big country, inhabited by many Chinese."

Formerly known as Swantz

 

Offline jr2

  • The Mail Man
  • 212
  • It's prounounced jayartoo 0x6A7232
    • Steam
so your a complete moron who thinks that if something is not directed by intelligence it's complete chance, how dis... actually I'm used to it.

*feels like smacking a certain someone*  Please keep personal insults to a minimum.  Let me help:

so your a complete moron who thinks that if something is not directed by intelligence it's complete chance, how dis... actually I'm used to it.

*sigh*  Here we go again.  Can't say I'm ready, but I'm game... sorta.

 

Offline Ghostavo

  • 210
  • Let it be glue!
    • Skype
    • Steam
    • Twitter
So you just throw in the towel, say "It's by pure chance," and sit back with a satisfied grin on your face, then mock those who attribute it to a being who is indeed fully capable of doing all that and more?

How very disappointing indeed. 

Do you have any idea how many things in the Universe that scientists know full and well about that just plain simply don’t make sense?  There are more to come.  Even if we did figure out every single law and every single method by which the Universe is run, what then?  The sheer awesomeness of it all will be an even greater testament to the existence of God!  Saying "God made it" is not a copout, but simply a very logical conclusion one can draw based upon what we know to be true as of right now.  I am of the school of thought that science does not attempt to disprove or deny a creator, but rather support His existence.

Ever heard of Occam's razor? The scientific method? Well, your idea of science is not science at all. Since you have already made the conclusions and are trying to support them. That's not science. That's... well... what creationism is.
"Closing the Box" - a campaign in the making :nervous:

Shrike is a dirty dirty admin, he's the destroyer of souls... oh god, let it be glue...

 

Offline jr2

  • The Mail Man
  • 212
  • It's prounounced jayartoo 0x6A7232
    • Steam
Ever heard the phrase "science falsely so called"?

 

Offline Ghostavo

  • 210
  • Let it be glue!
    • Skype
    • Steam
    • Twitter
Ever heard the phrase "science falsely so called"?

No?  :nervous:
"Closing the Box" - a campaign in the making :nervous:

Shrike is a dirty dirty admin, he's the destroyer of souls... oh god, let it be glue...

 

Offline karajorma

  • King Louie - Jungle VIP
  • Administrator
  • 214
    • Karajorma's Freespace FAQ
You hear it a lot when real scientists talk about Creation Science. :p
Karajorma's Freespace FAQ. It's almost like asking me yourself.

[ Diaspora ] - [ Seeds Of Rebellion ] - [ Mind Games ]

 
What else could it be Bobboau?

Swantz, that's exactly right.  I fail to believe that consciousness could come from unconsciousness.  That life could somehow form out of a vacuum.  That sentience could simply "be" without something else sentient making it so.  I do indeed believe that God Himself is the starting point of the whole Universe.  By what means this came about, I fail to understand exactly.  Whatever we can come up with, however, I believe will only point more toward a creator than away.



Ghostavo, you say that what I do is not called science, but creationism.  You say I am going against the scientific method.  Well, how about this for scientific method?  This is the actual thought process I went through when becoming a Christian, BTW:

You can't get something from nothing, according to science, correct?  Well, every moron on this planet can notice that we indeed have this thing called sentience, called intelligence, called life, called matter, called energy, and many other things.  They must have come from somewhere.  That is indeed a fact.  FROM THIS FACT, I have drawn the conclusion that God is the starting point, the Alpha, the cause for the effect that is the Universe.  A universal cause.  The cause of all effects.  The starting point (which is really sort of a mis-phrasing, as God exists outside of time, he really has no starting point, so do not ask where God came from, He simply is and always has and always will).

I am not making conclusions and trying to support them.  I have found things which have no explination outside of an intelligent creator, and am as such, drawing that conclusion based on the facts I and others (Christians and otherwise) have observed within the natural universe.
Could we with ink the ocean fill, and were the skies of parchment made
Were every stalk on earth a quill, and every man a scribe by trade
To write the love of God above, would drain the ocean dry
Nor could the scroll contain the whole, though stretched from sky to sky!

 

Offline jr2

  • The Mail Man
  • 212
  • It's prounounced jayartoo 0x6A7232
    • Steam
Quote from: http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1%20Timothy%206:20-21;&version=48;
20 O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science, falsely so called,  21 which some professing have erred concerning the faith. Grace be with thee. Amen.

That's what Evolutionism is.  :p  I can sling labels, too.

EDIT: And, G0atmaster, heh, that's ok, according to them, we are just a bunch of random chemicals and electrical signals gone haywire.  All of your responses are random based on your surroundings and pre-established patterns.  Likewise for them.  Really, we can't be blamed for not seeing the truth that we are animals, and share a common heritage with earthworms, now, can we?  It's all random chemicals bouncing around inside our heads.  *snort*

  

Offline karajorma

  • King Louie - Jungle VIP
  • Administrator
  • 214
    • Karajorma's Freespace FAQ
Pity they aren't correct labels then.

Quote
"Evolutionism", is defined by the OED as "[t]he theory of evolution, evolutionary assumptions or principles". Creationists tend to use the term evolutionism in a misleading sense in order to suggest that evolution and creationism are equal in a philosophical debate.

Do you have any idea how many things in the Universe that scientists know full and well about that just plain simply don’t make sense?

Just because something isn't understood now doesn't mean it always won't be. And even if it isn't ever explained that doesn't mean you should jump to a conclusion about God having had to do it.

Quote
Saying "God made it" is not a copout, but simply a very logical conclusion one can draw based upon what we know to be true as of right now.

3000 years ago people wouldn't have understood the natural processes that caused it to rain. Saying "It rains because God opens the sky to make it rain"  would also have been the logical conclusion (using your example of logic) based on what they knew was true. But it's wrong.
 Can't you see what a cop out it was to say that? Can't you see how giving that answer is just throwing in the towel? The more scientific answer however would be correct, "I don't know why it rains yet so I'm not going to say God did it. I'm simply going to say we don't know yet and do my best to try to understand the cause."

These days we know that anyone who thinks it rains because God opens the sky to let the rain in is an idiot but when it comes to other scientific questions there are plenty of people willing to instantly give God the credit for it because we don't know the answer yet. It's likely that their views will turn out to be as ignorant and wrong as the ancient people who believed God made it rain. Actually they'll be more ignorant, cause people like me told them it was a stupid assumption to say "God did it" when you haven't got enough proof in either direction.

Quote
So you just throw in the towel, say "It's by pure chance," and sit back with a satisfied grin on your face

Nope. That's the huge difference. Science doesn't throw in the towel. It's always trying to find the cause. Religion on the other hand thinks it knows the cause so there is no need to look for it. Sure you can tell me philosophers will keep debating the question of "Why God did it" but the question of how loses importance.

Swantz, that's exactly right.  I fail to believe that consciousness could come from unconsciousness.

I fail to believe that water could turn invisible. I fail to believe water could rise up into the sky and turn into clouds. I fail to believe water could float in the sky as water until it suddenly and for no reason falls out of the sky.

Arguments from personal incredulity are worthless. Why it rains can be explained scientifically Yet if you talked to someone 3000 years ago they'd give you the same sort of arguments I just wrote (probably shortly before they stoned you for being a witch or heretic!).
« Last Edit: November 07, 2007, 02:55:28 am by karajorma »
Karajorma's Freespace FAQ. It's almost like asking me yourself.

[ Diaspora ] - [ Seeds Of Rebellion ] - [ Mind Games ]

 

Offline NGTM-1R

  • I reject your reality and substitute my own
  • 213
  • Syndral Active. 0410.
I fail to believe that consciousness could come from unconsciousness.

Put another way, you should be able to remember being inside your mother's womb from the moment you were concieved.

Since consciousness cannot come from unconciousness, there must therefore be some kind of continuity of consciousness, since by most religious standards and hence presumably your own that is a seperate human life and not a part of the female body. Otherwise you're going to start losing ground on an abortion debate. It's a vicious cycle, innit?

But you don't remember. You can't. You weren't concious at the time. You developed conciousness from unconciousness, eventually.

's not gonna fly, partner.

Yes, I'm nitpicking here, but this is how the internally contradictory arguments creationistic and intelligent design people present work. It makes a suitable microcosm for the arguments as a whole. So go. Bring on your pseudoscience and invalid arguments. We've seen them before, we'll see them again.
« Last Edit: November 07, 2007, 03:07:47 am by ngtm1r »
"Load sabot. Target Zaku, direct front!"

A Feddie Story