Yeah, well, you see... that's the difference between a horrorist and a terrorist.
Terror is fear incuced by act that happened.
Horror is fear, induced by acts of terror that
could or
might happen.
Terrorists instill fear by doing acts of terror.
Horrorists manage the same only by saying that there might be acts of terror (if you don't do as we say, as we know everything better than
you).
It's really rather elaborate scheme, and what's ironical is that the horrorists and terrorists are actually helping each other:
-terrorists don't need to actually do stuff as often when horrorists keep the people afraid of them, change the society and laws to worse directon and so on, in which case the terrorists win (because they've managed to force the society to change for worse)
-horrorists can have a good scarecrow to show to the people and use it as a motive to change the country for the better (for the horrorise regime) although they de facto are changing it for the worse for the actual people, who soon have to live in fear for not only terrorists but also their own government who polices e-mail, telephone calls, mail, your shopping habits, your aquaintances and friends (those who aren't reporting about you themselves, that is), transportation, money use and who the heck knows what else. Also, they get a "reason" to round people up, lock them up and keep them so just by defining them to be terrorists. Ain't that cool.
I would be applauding sarcastically if I didn't need my hands to prevent myself from vomiting on the keyboard every time I think about it.
