[IceyJones]

Dude. We need that in FS2. NOW.

i fear thats to heavy for FS2. to many polys.....to model for a movie is completely different as game-modeling....so i would have to make it completly new :/

Where'd that come from? FireCrack?

  whats firecrack?

[Koth]

whats firecrack?

FireCrack is a community member who created some hi-poly models among them being some missiles.

[IceyJones]

hahaha.....lol..

but no....thats missile is selfmade, just modeled from this reference:

[Cobra]

Dude. We need that in FS2. NOW.

i fear thats to heavy for FS2. to many polys.....to model for a movie is completely different as game-modeling....so i would have to make it completly new :/

Well, not for ingame, but for the tech model.

[IceyJones]

lol, hehe....about that we can talk

nevertheless...had to retouch it again....the sizes were not right, because on the ref pic its hard to see.....but on my search for gunfire-refs i found this damn cb ani of the interceptor, where it is shown from all sides......so......here again....the final-final



[attachment deleted by ninja]

[Snail]

Bah this one looked better.

[attachment deleted by ninja]

[Mongoose]

Icey, that is some seriously amazing work.  I'm hoping we get a nice close-up of that baby in the final product.

[IceyJones]

Bah this one looked better.

damn....i fear you´re right.....i think i cancel the whole thing

I'm hoping we get a nice close-up of that baby in the final product.

definately

[jr2]

Bah this one looked better.

*reflexively reaches for salt shaker*

[Vasudan Admiral]

Wow, that there is the prettiest missile FS has ever seen.

[IceyJones]

thx all

but now i need advise....which renderstyle do you like most or fits the fs-cutscene style most in your opinion. just vote the file-name....



[attachment deleted by ninja]

[Cobra]

E0_S100.jpg is more FS-style

[IceyJones]

really? not too smooth?!
nearly all details are gone here.....hmmm...

but u might be right......

[Vasudan Admiral]

I'd say E100, but I'd also suggest putting a bit more shine contrast between the recessed areas and the beam parts on the surface. Looks fine otherwise.

[Topgun]

I say E50_S0.jpg.

[Cobra]

I say E50_S0.jpg.

Watch the FS1 intro again, the Arcadia doesn't have that kind of detail.

[Topgun]

I still like it though

[IceyJones]

e50 s0 will lead to the problem, that i would habe to activate highest quality AA in the animation .-> rendertimes higher

the settings with an s-value would also lead to a kind of motion blur effekt without motion blur activated -> low rendertimes

na...i will have to to animated testrenders

[Hades]

I say E50_S0.jpg.

Watch the FS1 intro again, the Arcadia doesn't have that kind of detail.

Uhh in case you know this is a Fan-made, and just cause the Arcaida doesn't have that much detail doesn't mean we can't use it.
Oh and btw if you are like that about high-detail, why didn't you object to using the HTL Lucifer in the other if the FS1 Lucifer didn't have that much detail?
@ Topgun: Yea I like that one to.

[Cobra]

The high-poly Lucifer is closer to the cutscene version than the FS1 Lucifer.

And I was talking about the CUTSCENE ARCADIA not having the detail as the last three versions of IceyJones' Arcadia.