Author Topic: Sathanas is really a bad super destoryer  (Read 6494 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline eliex

  • 210
Re: Sathanas is really a bad super destoryer



Or someone really trusts Alpha 1.
[/quote]

 Yeah, they should just clone Alpha 1 ten thousand times!  :D

 
Re: Sathanas is really a bad super destoryer
Thats what i hate about :v:. They don't pay attention to small stuff that matters. Like escorting a 6-kilometer long super soaker with one ****ing wing of bombers, even though the C has it's own fighter compliment that wasn't even launched at all
I actually wouldn't be surprised if the engine could handle that.

*sigh* i guess you can't be perfect at everything :rolleyes:. And at least they didn't try and make too much stuff and ruin the game.

Mouse over "Too much" and you'll see what i mean...
Fun while it lasted.

Then bitter.

 

Offline General Battuta

  • Poe's Law In Action
  • 214
  • i wonder when my postcount will exceed my iq
Re: Sathanas is really a bad super destoryer
Haloboy, I would say that there are almost certainly gameplay considerations which led V to make the decision to place Alpha 1 and his three fellow bombers in the starring role.

I'm sure they paid attention to the small stuff that matters (take note of the level of detail they put into the universe), but it's always going to come second to fun. Going the other route causes Battle of Endor syndrome where the player really just doesn't make a difference.

 
Re: Sathanas is really a bad super destoryer
I like it when the player doesn't make a difference. I'd rather BOE syndrome then invincible mob syndrome :P
Fun while it lasted.

Then bitter.

 

Offline blowfish

  • 211
  • Join the cult of KILL MY ROUTER!!!!!!!!!!1
Re: Sathanas is really a bad super destoryer
I like it when combat is almost balanced without the player, and you need to do is turn the tide slightly in favor of your allies.

BOE Missions are OK once in a while when they're necessary for plot purposes etc, but not every mission should be a BOE mission.

 

Offline AlphaOne

  • !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • 210
Re: Sathanas is really a bad super destoryer
You know the shivans and theyr ships and tactics really remind me of the WW2 German armies and Panzergroups and its blitzkrieg tactics. I mean there you have an army that was designed for one thing in mind rapid conquest of the enemies teritories. When it came down to actualy defending they kinda sucked really bad right up untilll 1942 or 43 can remember exactly when theyr armed forces were beginning to go onto a defensive battle stile. But by this time it was too late for them. Anyway to be more to the point the Sath is one huge monster.

While i do agree that it must have at least the fighter/bommbver complement of the big C i do not believe it to have a decive numerical advanteage from thios regard. Maybe another 40 or 50 ships but that is it.

Also The sath is really a superb fighting machine when it comed down to what it does and that is smash through enemy defence lines . And that is it. It was not designed with "go hunt that ship down" type of thinking. Whant to know why??? Cuz with all those engines and fighter/bommber complement that thing need at least an equal amount of fuel as the Collie needs if not more.

So it is not a long range tipe of ship . So to answear the raised question the Sath is a bad SD when it comes down to engaging and destroyng multiple ships at once. But because of its ovewhealming beams it doesnt have much of a problem with that. Not unless you have destroyers armed with at least 2 beams of similar calliber. Then the Sath is well its in a whole world of hurt. Cuz 3 destroyers comming at it form different vectors could in theory take it out before the sath has a chance to take them out.

But since the only other regional power that have proven to be a inconvinience and a small one at that is the GTVA with they super weak beams they dont have much to worry. Not for a while anyway.

There is only so much that the shivans can do to prevent a civ. or another power to rise up to theyr level and surpass them. And since the shivans seems to have been really stagnant during the past 8k years at least they must realize of course that the only thing keeping them allive is no longer they tech. superiority but rather they sheer numbers.

Think of the sath as a battering ram that smashed the enemies gates to allow soldiers to come in (in this case its massive fighter/bommber complement ) and cause panic in the enemi lines thus allowing the rest of the forces in this case Ravanas and Demens to come in and kill off the enemy and take the sistems.
Die shivan die!!
Then jumps into his apple stealth pie and goes of to war.What a brave lad....what a brave lad say the ladies in red.
 

(\_/)
(O.o)
(> < ) 

This is Bunny . Copy  Bunny  into your signature to help him on his way to world domination!

 

Offline castor

  • 29
    • http://www.ffighters.co.uk./home/
Re: Sathanas is really a bad super destoryer
Also because all beam at the forward,Sathanas must always change its shipbow to focus the fire power on the cruiser direction with its poor maneuverability
 :no: :no: :no:
True. But then again, which Shivan or GTVA ship could win a whole war alone? I think Sath is a tool made for one purpose: to get rid of anything that stands in front of it, be it a cruiser, a destroyer, or the Himalayas. There are plenty of other ship classes that cannot do this, but are fine for the other jobs at hand.

 
Re: Sathanas is really a bad super destoryer
I don't think the Sath is designed as a warship.

It's designed to get somewhere and roll over anything which tries to stop it. IMO, that's the most plausible explanation for both its design (and its shortcomings) and its actions.

 

Offline Snail

  • SC 5
  • 214
  • Posts: ☂
Re: Sathanas is really a bad super destoryer
About no escorts. If you fail to disable the Sath's beam cannons in Bearbaiting, in the briefing of High Noon it tells you that the Sathanas destroyed their entire blockade with only ONE functional beam cannon.

 

Offline AlphaOne

  • !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • 210
Re: Sathanas is really a bad super destoryer
that is absolute bulls*** ! Not even the Sath can take out an entire blocade fleet with just one beam cannon . I mean come on there must have been dozens if not hundreds of bommbers at the blocade and they are telling me that not even on bommber managed to shoot of 2 helios at the blasted thing?? That is ridiculous. I mean it is clear that the whole thing doesnt go acording to common sense logic . but nevertheless....
Die shivan die!!
Then jumps into his apple stealth pie and goes of to war.What a brave lad....what a brave lad say the ladies in red.
 

(\_/)
(O.o)
(> < ) 

This is Bunny . Copy  Bunny  into your signature to help him on his way to world domination!

 

Offline Jeff Vader

  • The Back of the Hero!
  • 212
  • Bwahaha
Re: Sathanas is really a bad super destoryer
Maybe the Sath used almost all of its fighter and bomber complement on the blockade. Which could explain why it only deployed 8 Basilisks against the Collie.
23:40 < achillion > EveningTea: ass
23:40 < achillion > wait no
23:40 < achillion > evilbagel: ass
23:40 < EveningTea > ?
23:40 < achillion > 2-letter tab complete failure

14:08 < achillion > there's too much talk of butts and dongs in here
14:08 < achillion > the level of discourse has really plummeted
14:08 < achillion > Let's talk about politics instead
14:08 <@The_E > butts and dongs are part of #hard-light's brand now
14:08 <@The_E > well
14:08 <@The_E > EvilBagel's brand, at least

01:06 < T-Rog > welp
01:07 < T-Rog > I've got to take some very strong antibiotics
01:07 < achillion > penis infection?
01:08 < T-Rog > Chlamydia
01:08 < achillion > O.o
01:09 < achillion > well
01:09 < achillion > I guess that happens
01:09 < T-Rog > at least it's curable
01:09 < achillion > yeah
01:10 < T-Rog > I take it you weren't actually expecting it to be a penis infection
01:10 < achillion > I was not

14:04 < achillion > Sometimes the way to simplify is to just have a habit and not think about it too much
14:05 < achillion > until stuff explodes
14:05 < achillion > then you start thinking about it

22:16 < T-Rog > I don't know how my gf would feel about Jewish conspiracy porn

15:41 <-INFO > EveningTea [[email protected]] has joined #hard-light
15:47 < EvilBagel> butt
15:51 < Achillion> yes
15:53 <-INFO > EveningTea [[email protected]] has quit [Quit: http://www.mibbit.com ajax IRC Client]

18:53 < Achillion> Dicks are fun

21:41 < MatthTheGeek> you can't spell assassin without two asses

20:05 < sigtau> i'm mining titcoins from now on

00:31 < oldlaptop> Drunken antisocial educated freezing hicks with good Internet == Finland stereotype

11:46 <-INFO > Kobrar [[email protected]] has joined #hard-light
11:50 < achtung> Surely you've heard of DVDA
11:50 < achtung> Double Vaginal Double ANal
11:51 < Kobrar> ...
11:51 <-INFO > Kobrar [[email protected]] has left #hard-light []

 

Offline Swifty

  • 210
  • I reject your fantasy & substitute my own
Re: Sathanas is really a bad super destoryer
About no escorts. If you fail to disable the Sath's beam cannons in Bearbaiting, in the briefing of High Noon it tells you that the Sathanas destroyed their entire blockade with only ONE functional beam cannon.
I like how when you destroy all the Sath's beam cannons, the Colossus in the next mission still proclaims how hard she's got fighting against it. :lol:

 

Offline Colonol Dekker

  • HLP is my mistress
  • 213
  • Aken Tigh Dekker- you've probably heard me
    • My old squad sub-domain
Re: Sathanas is really a bad super destoryer
Canon is as canon does. You need to remember that the Shivans you fight and kill in nearly every single mission have to come from somewhere.
Campaigns I've added my distinctiveness to-
- Blue Planet: Battle Captains
-Battle of Neptune
-Between the Ashes 2
-Blue planet: Age of Aquarius
-FOTG?
-Inferno R1
-Ribos: The aftermath / -Retreat from Deneb
-Sol: A History
-TBP EACW teaser
-Earth Brakiri war
-TBP Fortune Hunters (I think?)
-TBP Relic
-Trancsend (Possibly?)
-Uncharted Territory
-Vassagos Dirge
-War Machine
(Others lost to the mists of time and no discernible audit trail)

Your friendly Orestes tactical controller.

Secret bomb God.
That one time I got permabanned and got to read who was being bitxhy about me :p....
GO GO DEKKER RANGERSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
President of the Scooby Doo Model Appreciation Society
The only good Zod is a dead Zod
NEWGROUNDS COMEDY GOLD, UPDATED DAILY
http://badges.steamprofile.com/profile/default/steam/76561198011784807.png

 
Re: Sathanas is really a bad super destoryer
They come from your mom.

JK, couldn't resist :D

I think we should all be thankful that things turned out the way they did or else :v: would develop the Darek Smart syndrome...
Fun while it lasted.

Then bitter.

  

Offline Jeff Vader

  • The Back of the Hero!
  • 212
  • Bwahaha
Re: Sathanas is really a bad super destoryer
Shh! Quiet down, already. The unspeakable name has already been mentioned too many times during the past few days. We're tempting fate. Don't push your luck.
23:40 < achillion > EveningTea: ass
23:40 < achillion > wait no
23:40 < achillion > evilbagel: ass
23:40 < EveningTea > ?
23:40 < achillion > 2-letter tab complete failure

14:08 < achillion > there's too much talk of butts and dongs in here
14:08 < achillion > the level of discourse has really plummeted
14:08 < achillion > Let's talk about politics instead
14:08 <@The_E > butts and dongs are part of #hard-light's brand now
14:08 <@The_E > well
14:08 <@The_E > EvilBagel's brand, at least

01:06 < T-Rog > welp
01:07 < T-Rog > I've got to take some very strong antibiotics
01:07 < achillion > penis infection?
01:08 < T-Rog > Chlamydia
01:08 < achillion > O.o
01:09 < achillion > well
01:09 < achillion > I guess that happens
01:09 < T-Rog > at least it's curable
01:09 < achillion > yeah
01:10 < T-Rog > I take it you weren't actually expecting it to be a penis infection
01:10 < achillion > I was not

14:04 < achillion > Sometimes the way to simplify is to just have a habit and not think about it too much
14:05 < achillion > until stuff explodes
14:05 < achillion > then you start thinking about it

22:16 < T-Rog > I don't know how my gf would feel about Jewish conspiracy porn

15:41 <-INFO > EveningTea [[email protected]] has joined #hard-light
15:47 < EvilBagel> butt
15:51 < Achillion> yes
15:53 <-INFO > EveningTea [[email protected]] has quit [Quit: http://www.mibbit.com ajax IRC Client]

18:53 < Achillion> Dicks are fun

21:41 < MatthTheGeek> you can't spell assassin without two asses

20:05 < sigtau> i'm mining titcoins from now on

00:31 < oldlaptop> Drunken antisocial educated freezing hicks with good Internet == Finland stereotype

11:46 <-INFO > Kobrar [[email protected]] has joined #hard-light
11:50 < achtung> Surely you've heard of DVDA
11:50 < achtung> Double Vaginal Double ANal
11:51 < Kobrar> ...
11:51 <-INFO > Kobrar [[email protected]] has left #hard-light []

 
Re: Sathanas is really a bad super destoryer
I think the worst that could happen is if he manages to [gasp]make a decent game[/gasp].
Fun while it lasted.

Then bitter.

 
Re: Sathanas is really a bad super destoryer
Maybe the sath was just a HUGE expiremental jump drive housing...  :doubt:
Sig nuked! New one coming soon!

 

Offline blowfish

  • 211
  • Join the cult of KILL MY ROUTER!!!!!!!!!!1
Re: Sathanas is really a bad super destoryer
I'd have to agree that the Sath was built primarily to do whatever it was the Shivans did to Capella and go wherever they went afterward, and as an uber-wtf-beam-kill-everything-in-its-path warship second.