[Kamikaze]

Oooh, allowing them would be awesome, I even have one prepped

[Fineus]

So long as there's a size limit of something like 500x100... I'm thinking of all 56K users here...

[Kamikaze]

So they're allowed if they're small? (filesize) If so do you have img tagging active in sigs?

[Fineus]

Small in size and filesize - filesize because I'd rather read the forum threads than look at someones oh-so-pretty image once. Size because large images have larger filesize and there's no need to have them that big anyway

[Corsair]

Originally posted by Thunder
So long as there's a size limit of something like 500x100... I'm thinking of all 56K users here...

Like me...How about only Steak gets to post his really pretty one in his siggy

[Setekh]

Decision's been made: no. It would just be too much to moderate people's sigs. Unless, of course, you guys can present a compelling enough argument to convince us otherwise.

[Fineus]

Yeah, we're open to persuasion - it'd better be a good arguement though

[Nico]

Originally posted by Thunder
Yeah, we're open to persuasion - it'd better be a good arguement though

a good one: allow it and I make the Aquila
No, actually, I never put any pics in my sig, so I don't caaaaaaaare

[CP5670]

This was posted on the SSC forums a few months ago:

Zig pics!? Bah! Back in my day.. all we had were ASCII zigs! None of this JPG, PNG, GIF crap! We were REAL men in a REAL war! None of the pansy-*** crap they call "war" nowadays....

[Kitsune]

Well, there is the 'show avatar' and the 'show url instead of image' options in everyone's, options.

Could always try to edit in a 'display image in users signatures?:yes/no' option as well.

It'd give me a reason to finish the station I had created awhile back.

[WMCoolmon]

Simple:
{
allowsigimage();
}

else
{
print("Naughty, naughty...");
}
?>

[Setekh]

Originally posted by WMCoolmon
Simple:
{
allowsigimage();
}

else
{
print("Naughty, naughty...");
}
?>

Nice one...