treba streljat...
You have to be 21 for that, don't you? Or is it just the US that requires that age to get a license for it?
//Non Slavic people, BEWARE!
20 years old cousin still plays it "smart" and drives a ****ing 220 horsepower car around without a license.
by law, you're forbidden to drive a car over 100 horsepower till you hit 21 or 22 and at least 2 years of driving experience...
Guess that law works just like the gun ban in Chicago...
And I bought my first car at the age 19, it has 235'ish HP, and here I am, 3 years later, in 1 piece, with no commited* accidents.
It all comes down to
high gas prices and low gas mileage being a pain when racing too often responsibility, I never screw around at full throttle unless I'm on an empty parking lot. And I only screw around for
burnouts and doughnuts 'educational purposes' such as turning while braking on snow, or regaining control of my car when going sideways on an icy surface.
Especially when my sister's friend at 17 has access to a 3.0 Focus ST and cannot see out of the back window.
Blame the legal guardians, not the system. There's a lot of 17 year olds who dream of a 1.6 liter Focus, and who can use it safely.
Again- it all comes down to who's responsible, and who ain't.
I am all for 16 as minimum age, even if it's with a parent/guardian who has min. 21 years and a license min. 3 years. If you teach the kids how to drive safely early on, they'll be less of a threat when they grow up move on to whatever powerfull or heavy and full of torque monster they can afford (and the Rice Rockets used in street races aren't owned by 16 year olds, more like 26, who need to learn some things the hard way).
*-
I was, however a victim of an accident, while standing in place waiting for a green light.
I was rear ended by a 7.5 ton Mercedes, who couldn't stop at the red light due to ice on the road. No one, except my rear bumper, taillight, and the guy's front bumper and right headlight were hurt when he pushed me through the intersection at some 25 MPH.