Originally posted by Zeronet
If he didnt posses NBC weapons, he'd let the inspectors in and have the sanctions lifted, truth is, he does have them.
Iran, well they are involved in Afganistan, trying to influence the government their. Iran are giving the police forces in Afganistan Iranian made HK clones(brand new), jeeps etc and their is a deeper meaning to this Axis of Evil(classified information most likey). Truth is they know
more than us.
EDIT: Another reason is this http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/story.hts/world/1305945
Is it right to use what is, in effect, evil measures to destroy evil? Does the end justify the means - especially if the means is a possible nuclear strike - if there are still other measures that can be taken?
I mean, look at the terrorists in Cuba. I know there is no real doubt they are evil and guilty, and deserve to die, but the US - and civillised world - has a justice system based on Innocent until proven Guilty. When that's broken, surely you risk becoming just as bad as the enemy?
The other thing is that Afghanistan has still to be rebuilt. Personally, I think one of the major missions
must be to rebuild that country from scratch, above and beyond what the bombing destroyed, to help gain support from the Muslim world.
Possbily we should be looking at ways to reduce the risk of NBC weapons being used, rather than antagonises an unstable dictator who has already used them against his own people. Even if it's only temporary - to creat a window of opportunity - it;s got to be better than the slaughter of innocents, and those who don't have a choice but to fight.
EDIT - it's difficult to criticise Bush's policy without sounding like defending the likes of Iraq and Iran, but I'm trying to make a valid point
