So does that mean depriving someone of internet access is a human rights violation? 
If we're going down that road and applying real world laws to internet related application - does that mean that if someone trolls a forum, the owner for the forum can prosecute for harassment? That if you flame someone in an online game, they can take you to court for it?
Strictly speaking, yes, you can, but it depends greatly on what was said, and the 'trackability' of the person in question.
As was mentioned earlier, the report isn't really saying that the Internet is a basic human right, it's saying that piracy is not like Drunk Driving. If you drink-drive, you can lose your license to drive for several years (though, this doesn't happen nearly often enough imho), what this law tried to say, from what I understand, is that if you are caught downloading software illegally, one of the punishments involved may be forced removal of Internet use.
The problem with this is that, in order to drive a car, you need to pay for lessons, a test, a car, MOT, Tax, Insurance etc, you need to be qualified to own a car, because a car can do actual physical harm, it can kill people, especially if driven by a drunk. A Computer, or an Internet connection poses no such risk, withdrawing a car license is not a punishment, it's a protection for both the driver and those around him, it's done for safety reasons, no such justification can be applied to an Internet connection, and there is a basic human right surrounding punishments. Someone can get 6 months in jail and a 2 year driving ban only because of the safety aspect, you wouldn't find it so easy to pass the same kind of sentence for piracy.
Shoplifters can be banned from individual stores at the stores discretion, for example, they can even be banned from a particular shopping area by a court, but they cannot have 'the right to go shopping' removed short of enforced incarceration.
