Author Topic: Sci-Fi Ship Concepts - Practicallity not required. Functionality? Yes.  (Read 2492 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Thaeris

  • Can take his lumps
  • 211
  • Away in Limbo
Sci-Fi Ship Concepts - Practicallity not required. Functionality? Yes.
I was looking through the appendix of "Dune" again when I noted one of the more interesting ship concepts for a combat vessel I've seen science fiction: The Crusher...

From Dune:

"CRUSHERS: military space vessels composed of many smaller vessels locked together and designed to fall on an enemy position, crushing it."

Essentially, I see it as a reusable bomb. It breaks apart in orbit, lands on its target, and, if it survives, takes off again to rejoin as a whole or land on another nearby target.

Smash-tastic.
"trolls are clearly social rejects and therefore should be isolated from society, or perhaps impaled."

-Nuke



"Look on the bright side, how many release dates have been given for Doomsday, and it still isn't out yet.

It's the Duke Nukem Forever of prophecies..."


"Jesus saves.

Everyone else takes normal damage.
"

-Flipside

"pirating software is a lesser evil than stealing but its still evil. but since i pride myself for being evil, almost anything is fair game."


"i never understood why women get the creeps so ****ing easily. i mean most serial killers act perfectly normal, until they kill you."


-Nuke

 

Offline NGTM-1R

  • I reject your reality and substitute my own
  • 213
  • Syndral Active. 0410.
Re: Sci-Fi Ship Concepts - Practicallity not required. Functionality? Yes.
The repair bills make me wince.

I've always admired the design of the ISD/VSD, personally. It actually makes sense as an assault vessel, because you can direct all or nearly all guns forward.
"Load sabot. Target Zaku, direct front!"

A Feddie Story

 

Offline General Battuta

  • Poe's Law In Action
  • 214
  • i wonder when my postcount will exceed my iq
Re: Sci-Fi Ship Concepts - Practicallity not required. Shiver me timbers! Walk the plank! Function
Why not just drop a few kinetic kill vehicles? Not reusable, but a hell of a lot cheaper than some kind of smash-and-take-off drone.

  

Offline The E

  • He's Ebeneezer Goode
  • 213
  • Nothing personal, just tech support.
    • Steam
    • Twitter
Re: Sci-Fi Ship Concepts - Practicallity not required. Functionality? Yes.
While rocks are not free, citizen, they are definitely more practical than that.
If I'm just aching this can't go on
I came from chasing dreams to feel alone
There must be changes, miss to feel strong
I really need lifе to touch me
--Evergrey, Where August Mourns

 

Offline mxlm

  • 29
Re: Sci-Fi Ship Concepts - Practicallity not required. Functionality? Yes.
I've always admired the design of the ISD/VSD, personally. It actually makes sense as an assault vessel, because you can direct all or nearly all guns forward.

While that's true, aren't they meant to be the primary capital ships in the navy? In which case...maybe something more versatile was called for? I dunno, I guess you could always conduct fleet actions in such such a way that you're always charging the enemy, but...
I will ask that you explain yourself. Please do so with the clear understanding that I may decide I am angry enough to destroy all of you and raze this sickening mausoleum of fraud down to the naked rock it stands on.

 

Offline Dilmah G

  • Failed juggling
  • 211
  • Do try it.
Re: Sci-Fi Ship Concepts - Practicallity not required. Functionality? Yes.
I was looking through the appendix of "Dune" again when I noted one of the more interesting ship concepts for a combat vessel I've seen science fiction: The Crusher...

From Dune:

"CRUSHERS: military space vessels composed of many smaller vessels locked together and designed to fall on an enemy position, crushing it."

Essentially, I see it as a reusable bomb. It breaks apart in orbit, lands on its target, and, if it survives, takes off again to rejoin as a whole or land on another nearby target.

Smash-tastic.
There's gravity in space now?

(Forgive me, I'm not familiar with Dune)

 

Offline General Battuta

  • Poe's Law In Action
  • 214
  • i wonder when my postcount will exceed my iq
Re: Sci-Fi Ship Concepts - Practicallity not required. Functionality? Yes.
It's an orbit-to-ground weapon.

In the Duniverse it may have to actually be fairly slow in order to get past shields.

 

Offline Thaeris

  • Can take his lumps
  • 211
  • Away in Limbo
Re: Sci-Fi Ship Concepts - Practicallity not required. Functionality? Yes.
It's an orbit-to-ground weapon.

In the Duniverse it may have to actually be fairly slow in order to get past shields.

Good point! It's actually been quite a while since I read the novel, but that's probably exactly why a vessel like the crusher would exist.
"trolls are clearly social rejects and therefore should be isolated from society, or perhaps impaled."

-Nuke



"Look on the bright side, how many release dates have been given for Doomsday, and it still isn't out yet.

It's the Duke Nukem Forever of prophecies..."


"Jesus saves.

Everyone else takes normal damage.
"

-Flipside

"pirating software is a lesser evil than stealing but its still evil. but since i pride myself for being evil, almost anything is fair game."


"i never understood why women get the creeps so ****ing easily. i mean most serial killers act perfectly normal, until they kill you."


-Nuke

 
Re: Sci-Fi Ship Concepts - Practicallity not required. Functionality? Yes.
I assumed crushers were one-shot weapons, not reusable, but I'm probably wrong. I don't recall them being used in the story.

 

Offline Thaeris

  • Can take his lumps
  • 211
  • Away in Limbo
Re: Sci-Fi Ship Concepts - Practicallity not required. Functionality? Yes.
I don't believe they were. They were mentioned in the final battle on Dune in the first novel, though.

The only space battles Frank Herbert actually engages the reader in are (as far as I can remember) (a.) the strike on Harkonnen Spice reserves by Atreides warships and (b.) in the latter books (5 & 6) where no-ship combat ensues.
"trolls are clearly social rejects and therefore should be isolated from society, or perhaps impaled."

-Nuke



"Look on the bright side, how many release dates have been given for Doomsday, and it still isn't out yet.

It's the Duke Nukem Forever of prophecies..."


"Jesus saves.

Everyone else takes normal damage.
"

-Flipside

"pirating software is a lesser evil than stealing but its still evil. but since i pride myself for being evil, almost anything is fair game."


"i never understood why women get the creeps so ****ing easily. i mean most serial killers act perfectly normal, until they kill you."


-Nuke

 

Offline IronBeer

  • 29
  • (Witty catchphrase)
Re: Sci-Fi Ship Concepts - Practicallity not required. Functionality? Yes.
There's gravity in space now?

Always has been.
"I have approximate knowledge of many things."

Ridiculous, the Director's Cut

Starlancer Head Animations - Converted

 

Offline General Battuta

  • Poe's Law In Action
  • 214
  • i wonder when my postcount will exceed my iq
Re: Sci-Fi Ship Concepts - Practicallity not required. Functionality? Yes.
It's an orbit-to-ground weapon.

In the Duniverse it may have to actually be fairly slow in order to get past shields.

Good point! It's actually been quite a while since I read the novel, but that's probably exactly why a vessel like the crusher would exist.

Yeah, when thinking about it, that's the only reason to prefer a crusher over kinetic kill vehicles. You can gently settle on top of the target at just below shield threshold velocities.

Although a drone lasgun platform firing from orbit sounds even better. That part of Dune never made much sense.
« Last Edit: September 20, 2009, 02:25:25 pm by General Battuta »

 

Offline NGTM-1R

  • I reject your reality and substitute my own
  • 213
  • Syndral Active. 0410.
Re: Sci-Fi Ship Concepts - Practicallity not required. Functionality? Yes.
While that's true, aren't they meant to be the primary capital ships in the navy? In which case...maybe something more versatile was called for? I dunno, I guess you could always conduct fleet actions in such such a way that you're always charging the enemy, but...

You can still direct half your available gunpower in any direction with a slightly roll on the long axis. It would be hard to top that.
"Load sabot. Target Zaku, direct front!"

A Feddie Story

 

Offline Nuke

  • Ka-Boom!
  • 212
  • Mutants Worship Me
Re: Sci-Fi Ship Concepts - Practicallity not required. Functionality? Yes.
It's an orbit-to-ground weapon.

In the Duniverse it may have to actually be fairly slow in order to get past shields.

Good point! It's actually been quite a while since I read the novel, but that's probably exactly why a vessel like the crusher would exist.

Yeah, when thinking about it, that's the only reason to prefer a crusher over kinetic kill vehicles. You can gently settle on top of the target at just below shield threshold velocities.

Although a drone lasgun platform firing from orbit sounds even better. That part of Dune never made much sense.

the forms must be obeyed

since a majority of the fighters in the imperium use shields and sharp things in combat, mainly because guns wont go through shields. now if you fire a lasgun at a shield you get a nuclear explosion. and since such devices are against the great convention, you cant do that. even setting one off accidently could get your house stripped and your planet obliterated.

also drones are out of the question, since your not allowed to use computers. you could have remote guided drones. the hunter-seeker is a good example. war in general is frowned upon, and disputes between houses should be fought with a war of assassins, to reduce collateral damage.
« Last Edit: September 20, 2009, 04:22:36 pm by Nuke »
I can no longer sit back and allow communist infiltration, communist indoctrination, communist subversion, and the international communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids.

Nuke's Scripting SVN

 

Offline mxlm

  • 29
Re: Sci-Fi Ship Concepts - Practicallity not required. Functionality? Yes.
You can still direct half your available gunpower in any direction with a slightly roll on the long axis. It would be hard to top that.
Good point.
I will ask that you explain yourself. Please do so with the clear understanding that I may decide I am angry enough to destroy all of you and raze this sickening mausoleum of fraud down to the naked rock it stands on.