There's always anarchy for those who will not be satisfied. Just burn, pilliage, and destroy until there's nothing left. Somalia is still on the map, so clearly they're not done yet..
I think the point is that balancing government regulation with personal liberties is a difficult act, and is made more so when cultural conventions change in a matter where once what was regulated by traditional morals doesn't quite do it for everyone anymore...
That said, the truth of the matter is that law is a development of a moral value or value. A law is established (or attempted to be established) when personal morals are found to be deficit or precieved to be as such. A law is thus enforced morality.
Lastly, it's hard to not be cited as some sort of hypocrit when you desire to defend your own morals (which may or may not be ultimately of value to society) with the law, while also noting that you desire less government regulations. Simultaneously, there's also a problem when you cite that the law must be altered to enable something else, as this will also affect the actions of others, perhaps to a loss of their own livelyhoods. In any way, there's no perfect solution.
