From a tactical standpoint, sometimes having a single more powerful warship is favourable.
Think about it this way, using the critical existence failure model, where a warship retains roughly 100% of its firepower so long as it has 1 hitpoint remaining*. Also take into consideration a single opposing warship which is capable of destroying an Orion in a few volleys. In this case, having one ship with 10 times the firepower and 10 times the armor is better than having 10 separate ships, as when your ships are separate, every several volleys, you would be losing 10% of your firepower, whereas if you lumped them together, you would have 100% of your firepower until the moment it is destroyed.
Obviously, this takes into account quite specific circumstances, but from what the GTVA know of the Shivans, this is fairly relevant, especially in the context of the Colossus, which was designed to prospectively hunt SD Lucifers. Orions do get destroyed by Lucifer-class destroyers fairly quickly, resulting in a quicker dropoff of damage output. The GTVA had no way of knowing about multiple Sathanas-class warships, and could only really operate from knowledge during the great war, where the Shivans fielded a single flagship that served as the hub of control, not multiple targets that needed to be engaged simultaneously. As such, concentrating your own defense is worthwhile.
* This is not quite true in FS-verse due to fighter strikes on critical subsystems, but is close enough an approximation as the Shivans do not appear to do subsystem strikes with much frequency. Also, the turrets on the Colossus are well-armored enough to make this a non-factor in most circumstances - it takes a lot to take down one of the Colly's beam turrets, not so much for an Orion's.