Author Topic: Israel ****s it up, BAD  (Read 24523 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Sandwich

  • Got Screen?
  • 213
    • Skype
    • Steam
    • Twitter
    • Brainzipper
Re: Israel ****s it up, BAD
How is that any less questionable than the site that was linked to before? The implications (that everything's peachy in Gaza) are just as dishonest as the previous link.

Oh, definitely... but it's not purporting to be anything but satire. That site seemed to be somewhat serious (as opposed to, say, The Onion, which is obvious satire).

crazy to expect "peace activists" to behave peacefully

I'd expect a bit more paranoia honestly :p Activists of any kind tend to be borderline fanatic. And chances were good that at least some of those on board were there for the express purpose of making Israel's life a bit harder. I can appreciate that it might be difficult to put people onboard quickly though, but if that were the case, you could find a way of keeping the activists off the deck while you were boarding. Or if no options seemed viable, one could even blockade the port itself so the ships had no choice but to turn around, as seagoing vessels can't just pull up on a beach to unload. Either way, what was eventually done was pretty much the worst option available, and that speaks poorly indeed for the people who planned it.

Obviously Israel was ready for the hypocritical "peace activists" to put up a fight. Hence the soldiers armed with paintball guns and sidearms with live ammunition. Look at the other ships' boardings - if you can find any information about it at all in the media, considering how they were "boring" and went over without incident - to contrast how a boarding "should" go over.

I doubt that blockading the port itself would have worked, since that would have put the Israeli vessels in easy range of the Palestinian government (read: Hamas) kassams rockets, and perhaps even machine gun fire from shore.

You talk about poor planning on the part of the Israelis... where's the criticism against the "peace activists" who decided to (attempt to) run a legal blockade, instead of docking at the alternate, Israeli port, allowing their cargo to go through a security inspection, and then on via land into Gaza?

Didn't miss it, but it doesn't really change the fact that expansion of settlements continues to this day, with unspoken government assent. And '10-month settlement freeze' really says it all. What about the rest of the time? It should be a permanent and thoroughly enforced settlement freeze, with a gradual winding-down of those settlements already built, and then Israel will be a much better position to call Hamas out for the hypocrites that they are.

I don't even know how to respond to such tunnel-vision anymore. Israel builds buildings on territory she won in a defensive war*, and the world goes bonkers. Palestinians bombard Israeli towns - on undisputed Israeli soil!! - for months, and the world tells Israel to stop building homes.

* Yes, Israel fired the first actual shots in the war of '67, but if a peace activist thug stood in your front door and pointed a gun at your head, you'd be justified in doing what needed to be done to prevent that gun from firing, including shooting first.

What's hurting us in international relations is the hypocritical double-standard being applied. Yes, Israel is a democratic, moral, civil country and should be held to the standards of any other such country. If the Palestinians want their own similar country, they need to prove that state terrorism will not be their elected way forward.
That's certainly true. They do need to clean up their game. But Israel is not exactly making it easy for them. They're being kept in a state of perpetual poverty and starvation as the blockade allows far less supplies to pass than is actually needed for any kind of decent life. And under those circumstances, expecting them to clean up their game is rather optimistic. Israel is making much the same mistake that the US did with post-war Iraq and in Afghanistan, albeit on a smaller scale - You're making people's life miserable instead of improving it, and at the same time expecting them to stand up to the only group that seems to be trying to help them... in this case, Hamas.

Israel allows more than enough supplies through - what do you think we are, barbarians?? Do some investigation on the subject, and you'll find that the Hamas is hording a large portion of the supplies. The Hamas is most definitely not "helping" the Palestinians - they're terrorizing them: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wLjwe2b40YA

Uprooting Jewish families from Jewish towns in the Gaza Strip didn't tell the world that we were prepared to compromise?
This:
The removal of settlements from the Gaza strip was a good move and gained Israel a fair bit of respect here (and I would assume elsewhere as well), but sadly this has been squandered completely by the continued expension of the settlements in the west bank.
Demolishing the Gaza settlements was probably the biggest diplomatic score Israel has made in recent times. You got respect for that. Our politicians were all swooning and ready to support you (only morally, of course. They're politicians) against Hamas. But then comes a series of Big Mistakes that basically nullifies everything you gained from it, culminating in the recent events where Netanyahu basically gave the world the finger in regards to the West Bank settlements, not to mention the idiocy of that Dubai assasination that, while not conclusively proven as a Mossad operation, sure as hell stinks of it.

What the Gaza uprooting showed most accurately is what happens when you allow the Hamas free reign. I hope the results speak for themselves.

Sandwich makes it sound liek most of the violence is directed at Israelis, but it probably isn't. Wikipedia has casualty numbers all the way back to 1987. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli%E2%80%93Palestinian_conflict#Casualties

My favorite part of those statistics is the part where they totally break down how many of the deaths on each side were unarmed civilians as opposed to soldiers/terrorists. Nice.
SERIOUSLY...! | {The Sandvich Bar} - Rhino-FS2 Tutorial | CapShip Turret Upgrade | The Complete FS2 Ship List | System Background Package

"...The quintessential quality of our age is that of dreams coming true. Just think of it. For centuries we have dreamt of flying; recently we made that come true: we have always hankered for speed; now we have speeds greater than we can stand: we wanted to speak to far parts of the Earth; we can: we wanted to explore the sea bottom; we have: and so  on, and so on: and, too, we wanted the power to smash our enemies utterly; we have it. If we had truly wanted peace, we should have had that as well. But true peace has never been one of the genuine dreams - we have got little further than preaching against war in order to appease our consciences. The truly wishful dreams, the many-minded dreams are now irresistible - they become facts." - 'The Outward Urge' by John Wyndham

"The very essence of tolerance rests on the fact that we have to be intolerant of intolerance. Stretching right back to Kant, through the Frankfurt School and up to today, liberalism means that we can do anything we like as long as we don't hurt others. This means that if we are tolerant of others' intolerance - especially when that intolerance is a call for genocide - then all we are doing is allowing that intolerance to flourish, and allowing the violence that will spring from that intolerance to continue unabated." - Bren Carlill

 

Offline Wanderer

  • Wiki Warrior
  • 211
  • Mostly harmless
Re: Israel ****s it up, BAD
AFAIK jury was still out on the legality of the siege (at UN level or something). Not the least due the fact that Geneva Conventions prohibits the use of collective measures that do not distinguish between civilians and military.. Of course Israel never signed them but then they really should stop acting like 'innocent victims'.. Hell, if you oppress some one long enough they will start fighting back. If people feel the terrorists died while fighting for a justified cause they instantly revert from terrorists into freedom fighters and killing them will only create martyrs and instigate even more people to take up arms.

Last i heard of the blockade that IDF refused to release the list of banned items or at least give any reasons why certain - arbitrary - items were banned while some others were not. Like first shooting the hell out of Gaza and then banning the construction materials required to fix the houses. And then you wonder why does Hamas remains popular with Gazans... Jeez.. As long Israel avenges Hamas attacks via such methods it will only bolster the numbers of Hamas and other such groups. Banning freaking coriander for what? Out of spite?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8654337.stm

Firing white phosphorous rounds into populated urban ares is probably the only thing people remember from the Gaza thing.

I'm not saying Hamas would be any better.. Its just that Israel actions currently (most likely) justify at least for locals any kind of action they can take against Israel. An nope no real solutions either.
Do not meddle in the affairs of coders for they are soggy and hard to light

 

Offline Nemesis6

  • 28
  • Tongs
Re: Israel ****s it up, BAD
The IDF has released some of the radio exchanges they had with the various ships, and some more videos of the boardings of the other ships(where the passengers were NOT psychos).

Their channel is here: http://www.youtube.com/user/idfnadesk#p/a

 

Offline iamzack

  • 26
Re: Israel ****s it up, BAD
That answers the question "why didnt they just go into the Israeli port to have the ships inspected"

I read somewhere paper is also banned, is that true? It was a comment about how the ships had ****tons of paper because Israel blocks it from going into Gaza.

Quote
The BBC has received information from reliable sources that there are currently 81 items that are approved for import - from kidney beans to tinned meat - and as of March, shoes.

Shoes have only been allowed in since March?

Can someone please tell me if Israelis really believe that Palestinians should be grateful to Israel for giving them the aid that they do?
WE ARE HARD LIGHT PRODUCTIONS. YOU WILL LOWER YOUR FIREWALLS AND SURRENDER YOUR KEYBOARDS. WE WILL ADD YOUR INTELLECTUAL AND VERNACULAR DISTINCTIVENESS TO OUR OWN. YOUR FORUMS WILL ADAPT TO SERVICE US. RESISTANCE IS FUTILE.

 
Re: Israel ****s it up, BAD
the media loves depicting us as the bad guys, and the Palestinians as the oppressed underdogs.

Uhh... What media? Certainly not US media, lol.

Anyway, to be honest, the more research I do, the more I'm convinced Israel shouldn't even be there. All this talk about rockets, but Palestinian casualties are several times that of Israeli casualties to date. The IDF repeatedly kills nonviolent protesters. Hundreds of thousands of Palestinians have been forced out of their homes.

I love when people quote the ratios. It's like the world forgot what war was. Yes don't kid yourself this is a war. A very long and drawn out war with fuzzy lines and shady players. So if the kill death ratio was closer together you would feel much better right? Next time I am being shot at by 20 terrorists and I happen to have 1st class military training and 1st class support at my disposal I will be sure to try and miss them all and let them hit my compatriots first before I actually try and hit them. Wouldn't want to tip the scales there would we. Very nice how they conveniently don't point out how many of those deaths were armed terrorists/militants/peace activists gone berserk.

What are the Iraqi or Afghani to Coalition forces kill/death ratio? Next time I see them I will ask them to die cause you are getting a bit worried about the ratio and they seem to be surviving better than the terrorists they are hunting.

They have a K/D ratio of (this is figuring the LOWER estimates of Iraqi casualties) 4,500 – 90,000. That's a very nice 20 to 1 ratio. The Israeli Palestinian ratio is 6 to 1. I suppose in WWII the Allies won by keeping the K/D ration closer to an acceptable 2 to 1 right?

Funny how people just like to take war out of their vocabulary when it comes to Israel. They are after all just monsters so who cares right? They bath nightly in the blood of the innocent and invoke the name of  Lucifer to keep them safe right? (Every jew has 666 tattooed on their left butt cheek but shhh don't tell anyone.)

Meanwhile Israeli settlers continue to build illegal outposts all over the place, and then destroy Palestinian homes, crops, et cetera.

All over a claim that a god gave them the land?

Maybe the American Indians should rise up and take the land a god gave them. After all, they have ancestral rights to it!

Now we are getting somewhere. The legality of the settlements is messed up since all that land was gained in a defensive war (something that hasn't really happened much) The rules for land gained in an offensive war should have applied. But nevertheless, me and Sandwich will disagree (I think), It was ruled illegal. Fine I think all the settlements should be pulled back as much as possible (I'm sorry but huge cities like Gilo and Ma'le Adumim aren't going to dissapear... ever.) and the Palestinians should be given a state where they can control their own people their own water their own electricity their own food their own fanatics and when they show their true colors it will be an act of war by one sovereign nation on another... You can imagine the rest.

Personally, I'm getting sick to death of Israel being a mob of pricks and getting away with it. Just in the last few years they've invaded Lebanon,

Ooooh nice context. Invaded Lebanon after Hizbullah attacked and killed several soldiers and kidnapped the other who were returned in pieces. But you go right ahead to their families and tell them they had no right to react and they should have just accepted it.

attacked in Gaza with illegal weapons,

Attacked Gaza after how many rockets over how many years? Oh I'm sorry I didn't see you there with fingers in ears screaming LALALALALALALA. White phosphorus rounds are not illegible and are used by every western army in the world. If Israel wanted casualties with those phosphorus rounds you would have had hundreds of burn victims instead of a couple unfortunate souls caught in the crossfire. But then that begs the question what were those people doing in those areas? It had nothing to do with the fact the the leaflets and phone calls and sms text warnings were used by Hamas to assemble the residents in those areas so that the attack would cause civilian casualties. Nope it also had nothing to do with the fact that many of those people were held at gun point. Had nothing to do with the fact that if they didn't help Hamas would slaughter their family and if they did help and were killed their family would receive money from Iran (just like Saddam was doing back when he was still kicking).

blockaded Gaza causing massive poverty and economic hardship,

Blockaded Gaza causing Olympic sized swimming pools and 5 star restaurant/clubs to open. And it had nothing to do with the prevention of weapons and materials to a group that is accepted the world over as a terrorist organization. And they cut off all supplies right? No medical, food, water, electricity, gas supplies allowed in right? There are reports of thousands of people dying of starvation and diseases caused by poverty and lack of any civilized treatment right?

used Australian and other international passports to commit international murder

Oh I didn't realize they had found out that it was the Mossad. Funny.

and now killed 10 people in international waters.

10 “peace activists” who didn't try and beat and stab to death commandos. You expected the reaction to be... the soldier down on the ground getting beat senseless one metal rod after another finally finds the strength to pull out his... sternly written letter telling them how angry he is with them.

North Korea han't killed anywhere near as many people as the Israelis in the last decade, and yet they have huge sanctions while Israel gets treated as a civilized, responsible member of the international community. And they're not, not by a long shot.

good luck.

Huh... looked at the linked documents, and a lot if it is straight from the horse's mouth--The IDF.  Other linked sources appear to be fallacious extrapolations intended for political purposes.  In short, this evidence is (to me) unacceptable.

Well what sources provided the evidence that caused you to reach your own conclusions? Please share them. I want to know where the line of legitimate and not legitimate news reporting is with you. (by the way I noticed throughout your post that you are careful to say “to me” and “personally” I think that is important and I appreciate how you have presented your views not many people care enough to make that distinction anymore.)

Personally, it looks like some of those videos are staged--the 'preparing for attack' video shows waves at the point where hostilities begin, when in all other footage of the skirmish show the surrounds of the ship to be pitch black.  I also question the 'stun grenade' that was thrown at the IDF soldiers.  If I recall correctly, the stun grenade (aka flashbang) is supposed to be insanely loud and insanely bright.  The camera had a direct view of the device, but was not blinded.  I'm not an expert, but let me just say, I'm not convinced.

I'm not sure which videos you are referencing could you link to the different ones?

Can someone shed light on what kind of firefighting equipment civilian ships are equipped with?  It doesn't make sense to see activists using what look like garden hoses when they might have something much more powerful at their disposal.

Where do you see garden hoses? I see metal rods.

I'm willing to accept new evidence and am not in particular favor of any one side, but currently I am more suspicious of Israel due to it's refusal to allow an international investigation, it's seizure of all communications and media equipment during the raid, and reported abuse of prisoners after the raid.  It seems as if it has something to hide, and/or something it's trying to find. 

Ah the media, the greatest weapon at their disposal. Win the media and you win world opinion no matter what the facts are. We may never know if they did or did not confiscate those tapes. It could very well be that they did or just as likely/unlikely it could be that the news crews won't release it because it corroborates the Israeli account. These are news crews most of whom got this gig because they take an interest in the topic and are usually quite decided on their views consequently most of the news crews at this level, including the ones representing big news, are generally locals from whatever country that news is from. So it's not CNN but the Turkish reporter of CNN in Turkey. And as much as we would like to think they always put their nationality and views aside to get the facts and show the truth we all know that is not true all the time for any side. There is no way of knowing. So far however there have been several videos released that were not at all taken by any IDF or Israeli source so...

The whole thing is fubar.

Israel does have a right to defend herself, but not to murder innocent people trying to prevent an illegal blockade.

Innocent? These people were stabbing and beating soldiers to death. There was nothing innocent here. And as infuriating as it is for you to accept the blockade is very much a legal thing.

Today they captured ANOTHER ship. The Irish-owned MV Rachel Corrie. At least this was peaceful and nobody (from what i know so far) was hurt.
Well they took one of our ships, maybe I should take their embassy in Dublin.  :D

I have also just heard according to couple of news channels (still to be confirmed) that the Turkish PM is to travel on the next aid convoy WITH a Turkish military escort. Interesting.....

That would be very interesting. Any idea when?

[Edit] Actually, on re-re-reading my first post, I can see how he might have understood one of the sentences differently than I intended. I was a bit ambiguous in the phrasing. So I guess it may be an honest misunderstanding. At any rate, I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt on that.

I apologize if I misunderstood your intent. I sincerely don't look for more people to disagree with. It was unintentional.

But Israel is not exactly making it easy for them. They're being kept in a state of perpetual poverty and starvation as the blockade allows far less supplies to pass than is actually needed for any kind of decent life. And under those circumstances, expecting them to clean up their game is rather optimistic. Israel is making much the same mistake that the US did with post-war Iraq and in Afghanistan, albeit on a smaller scale - You're making people's life miserable instead of improving it, and at the same time expecting them to stand up to the only group that seems to be trying to help them... in this case, Hamas.

The only poverty and starvation are being caused by Hamas while they may go hungry Israel sends plenty of food and supplies but Like I mentioned before Hamas steals their supplies both for the gain of Hamas with more money and food and also to create this notion that Israel is starving the people. Hamas just happens to have enough money for huge swimming pools and fancy restaurants and clubs. Abuse on every level has been a complaint by the Palestinian people many times from stealing food to stealing supplies to stealing children to use for shields to murdering those that don't lend support or complain about the stealing.

Sandwich makes it sound liek most of the violence is directed at Israelis, but it probably isn't. Wikipedia has casualty numbers all the way back to 1987. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli%E2%80%93Palestinian_conflict#Casualties



Also, Sandiwch said something about IDF bulldozing illegal housing, and some of it happens to be Palestinian? As far as I'm aware, there's really aren't Palestinians building houses in Israeli-controlled areas, just Israelis building homes in Palestine in order to steal the land. But then again, all of Palestine apparently belongs to Israel. If I was Palestinian, I'd be launching rockets too. Israel has them all caged up like pet dogs and then goes on about how it's soooo good to them by feeding them, when the reason they need feeding in the first place is that Israel is keeping them from fishing, growing crops, etc.

The reason they need feeding in the first place is because of farming and living and letting live they chose the path of blood. They demanded war and sought violence they took to the streets blowing people up shooting at people driving by launching rockets and using what precious little they had to fund a flailing terror machine and then complain about the punishments. Yes many of them are caught in the middle but all they can do is blame Israel and yell for Israels destruction or get beaten and murdered by the local branch of terrorists. They are hostages to the monster they facilitated.
What you don't see with your eyes, don't invent with your mouth. Yiddish proverb

 

Offline General Battuta

  • Poe's Law In Action
  • 214
  • i wonder when my postcount will exceed my iq
Re: Israel ****s it up, BAD
For all my sympathy for Israel (which is at least as great as my sympathy for the Palestinians), posts like that are a big turn-off. They remind me of US conservative rhetoric.

Nothing is that black-and-white.

 

Offline iamzack

  • 26
Re: Israel ****s it up, BAD
the media loves depicting us as the bad guys, and the Palestinians as the oppressed underdogs.

Uhh... What media? Certainly not US media, lol.

Anyway, to be honest, the more research I do, the more I'm convinced Israel shouldn't even be there. All this talk about rockets, but Palestinian casualties are several times that of Israeli casualties to date. The IDF repeatedly kills nonviolent protesters. Hundreds of thousands of Palestinians have been forced out of their homes.

I love when people quote the ratios. It's like the world forgot what war was. Yes don't kid yourself this is a war. A very long and drawn out war with fuzzy lines and shady players. So if the kill death ratio was closer together you would feel much better right? Next time I am being shot at by 20 terrorists and I happen to have 1st class military training and 1st class support at my disposal I will be sure to try and miss them all and let them hit my compatriots first before I actually try and hit them. Wouldn't want to tip the scales there would we. Very nice how they conveniently don't point out how many of those deaths were armed terrorists/militants/peace activists gone berserk.

What are the Iraqi or Afghani to Coalition forces kill/death ratio? Next time I see them I will ask them to die cause you are getting a bit worried about the ratio and they seem to be surviving better than the terrorists they are hunting.

They have a K/D ratio of (this is figuring the LOWER estimates of Iraqi casualties) 4,500 – 90,000. That's a very nice 20 to 1 ratio. The Israeli Palestinian ratio is 6 to 1. I suppose in WWII the Allies won by keeping the K/D ration closer to an acceptable 2 to 1 right?

First of all, you misunderstand my meaning. Israel is *****ing about being under attack, and trying to defend itself, but it's six times more people than Palestinians are. That's what we call "overkill."

And you'll find that I absolutely do not support the Iraq war. We have as much right to be killing hundred of thousands of Iraqis as Israel has to be killing thousands of Palestinians.

It's retarded to claim victim or self defense status when you're occupying an entire country. It sounds incredibly stupid to whine about being attacked by the people you're caging up like dogs. What the hell do you expect?

If I was Palestinian, I'd be firing rockets too.
WE ARE HARD LIGHT PRODUCTIONS. YOU WILL LOWER YOUR FIREWALLS AND SURRENDER YOUR KEYBOARDS. WE WILL ADD YOUR INTELLECTUAL AND VERNACULAR DISTINCTIVENESS TO OUR OWN. YOUR FORUMS WILL ADAPT TO SERVICE US. RESISTANCE IS FUTILE.

 

Offline karajorma

  • King Louie - Jungle VIP
  • Administrator
  • 214
    • Karajorma's Freespace FAQ
Re: Israel ****s it up, BAD
If you were Palestinian, you'd be firing rockets too.

Altered to more closely reflect what would happen if the shoe was on the other foot. Do I need to point out that there was an Israeli plot to poison Germany's water supplies and kill millions AFTER the end of the war? Not to mention that there was one approved by Chaim Weizmann to murder thousands of SS soldiers being held prisoner by the Americans. That one only didn't succeed because the poison turned out to be weaker than they had thought. Doesn't the entire state of Israel owe its very existence to terrorism against the British?

But no, the rockets are just an act of unprovoked aggression.

Personally, I'm getting sick to death of Israel being a mob of pricks and getting away with it. Just in the last few years they've invaded Lebanon,

Ooooh nice context. Invaded Lebanon after Hizbullah attacked and killed several soldiers and kidnapped the other who were returned in pieces. But you go right ahead to their families and tell them they had no right to react and they should have just accepted it.

Exactly. Invaded Lebanon after a terrorist organisation and NOT the government of the country did something. So you declared war on a country over the actions of what your own country call a terrorist organisation.
« Last Edit: June 05, 2010, 06:54:47 pm by karajorma »
Karajorma's Freespace FAQ. It's almost like asking me yourself.

[ Diaspora ] - [ Seeds Of Rebellion ] - [ Mind Games ]

 

Offline Flipside

  • əp!sd!l£
  • 212
Re: Israel ****s it up, BAD
I think that part of the problem is that the attacks are being defined as the actions of Palestine as a geographical/political body, rather than the acts of individuals within that body. I've often been of the opinion that Hamas actually has very little control over the rocket-firers, and that is part of the problem, even when they do sign peace agreements, there will always be those who just ignore them (much as some settlers simply ignored Israeli government rules). Both sides are sort of playing the same game, they are limited in their abilities to stop the trouble-causers, and doing so would promote a large amount of negative public opinion, it's their own propoganda working against them, on both sides.

The first problem is humanitarian, but the second problem is infrastructure, without the infrastructure for any palestinian authority to actually enforce a ceasefire on its own side of the border from nutters and idiots who'll fire not because of any reason other than 'they're Israeli', then no cease-fire is actually going to work.

Indeed, the irony is that Israel may actually be in a position to gain more from helping the Palestinian authorities than from harming them.

  

Offline General Battuta

  • Poe's Law In Action
  • 214
  • i wonder when my postcount will exceed my iq
Re: Israel ****s it up, BAD
What I find particularly weird about Splinter's kill/death ratio argument is the morally bizarre notion that outrage over the number of Palestinian deaths is somehow predicated on the comparatively small number of Israeli deaths.

A death is a death, and worthy of concern, no matter who's doing the dying. It's a tragedy either way. And more people dying is bad. The fact that relatively few Israelis have died compared to Palestinians isn't the root cause of the concern here.

 

Offline karajorma

  • King Louie - Jungle VIP
  • Administrator
  • 214
    • Karajorma's Freespace FAQ
Re: Israel ****s it up, BAD
As long Israel avenges Hamas attacks via such methods it will only bolster the numbers of Hamas and other such groups. Banning freaking coriander for what? Out of spite?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8654337.stm

Quote
Among the large range of goods currently forbidden are jam, chocolate, wood for furniture, fruit juice, textiles, and plastic toys.

Seriously? Chocolate and jam? If Hamas can make weapons out of chocolate and jam then Israel has already lost. :p
Karajorma's Freespace FAQ. It's almost like asking me yourself.

[ Diaspora ] - [ Seeds Of Rebellion ] - [ Mind Games ]

 

Offline Flipside

  • əp!sd!l£
  • 212
Re: Israel ****s it up, BAD
What a singularly strange list...

Edit: Jaffa Cakes are certainly off the list then...

 

Offline karajorma

  • King Louie - Jungle VIP
  • Administrator
  • 214
    • Karajorma's Freespace FAQ
Re: Israel ****s it up, BAD
Maybe Jaffa cakes are the reason they don't allow chocolates and jam in. I have no idea if they use Israeli oranges for them. :p
Karajorma's Freespace FAQ. It's almost like asking me yourself.

[ Diaspora ] - [ Seeds Of Rebellion ] - [ Mind Games ]

 

Offline Flipside

  • əp!sd!l£
  • 212
Re: Israel ****s it up, BAD
Funny you should mention that, I was just bored enough to look, and the result was surprising...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jaffa_orange

I think we've unearthed the conspiracy...  ;)

Quote from: Wikipedia
The Jaffa orange, also known as the Shamouti orange, is a very sweet, almost seedless orange variety. Originally developed by Arab farmers in Palestine in the mid-19th century, it takes its name from the city of Jaffa where it was first produced for export.[1][2] Since the establishment of Israel in 1948, it has been grown and exported by Israeli producers.

 

Offline iamzack

  • 26
Re: Israel ****s it up, BAD
Oh, duh, the list of items allowed in is right there.

paper, books, pens, etc. aren't on the list. shoes and clothes have only been allowed in for 3 months. kitchenware has been allowed in for 2 months.
WE ARE HARD LIGHT PRODUCTIONS. YOU WILL LOWER YOUR FIREWALLS AND SURRENDER YOUR KEYBOARDS. WE WILL ADD YOUR INTELLECTUAL AND VERNACULAR DISTINCTIVENESS TO OUR OWN. YOUR FORUMS WILL ADAPT TO SERVICE US. RESISTANCE IS FUTILE.

 

Offline Sandwich

  • Got Screen?
  • 213
    • Skype
    • Steam
    • Twitter
    • Brainzipper
Re: Israel ****s it up, BAD
That really is a weird list. I'd be fascinated to see anything about the reasoning behind it, if anyone runs across anything.

I only have one comment, about the death ratio that keeps on being brought up. As General Battuta said, indeed a death is a death, and is tragic regardless. On the other hand, anyone who tells me honestly that they haven't found amusing the (supposed) deaths reported through the Darwin Awards is a liar. So, while it still may be tragic, when the circumstances are right, we do think that "he kinda had it coming".

Imagine 500 soldiers die fighting in a war. Tragic? Yes, of course - especially to their loved ones. But understandable... at least, as understandable as war can be. Those soldiers knew what they were getting into, and still put their lives on the line. One could argue that from a certain point of view, "they kinda had it coming." Now, imagine 500 civilians are killed when a dam breaks and a small town is swept away. Tragic? Yes, of course. But could one make the argument that they had it coming? Not at all.

Back to reality - an example that actually is a Darwin Awards winner. Read it - it's short. Tragic? Well, considering I live where those bombs were intended to go off, I have to say more tragi-comic. But ok, for argument's sake, yes, tragic that people died. Did they have it coming? Yeah, they kinda really did have it coming.

So the death ratio is meaningless. Are the suicide bombers counted among the Palestinian deaths? How about the AK-47 toting terrorists who got into gun battles with the IDF? Do they count? Sure, they're deaths, but did they have it coming?

Damn straight they did. But mom and baby at the cafe didn't.

Differentiate, please.
SERIOUSLY...! | {The Sandvich Bar} - Rhino-FS2 Tutorial | CapShip Turret Upgrade | The Complete FS2 Ship List | System Background Package

"...The quintessential quality of our age is that of dreams coming true. Just think of it. For centuries we have dreamt of flying; recently we made that come true: we have always hankered for speed; now we have speeds greater than we can stand: we wanted to speak to far parts of the Earth; we can: we wanted to explore the sea bottom; we have: and so  on, and so on: and, too, we wanted the power to smash our enemies utterly; we have it. If we had truly wanted peace, we should have had that as well. But true peace has never been one of the genuine dreams - we have got little further than preaching against war in order to appease our consciences. The truly wishful dreams, the many-minded dreams are now irresistible - they become facts." - 'The Outward Urge' by John Wyndham

"The very essence of tolerance rests on the fact that we have to be intolerant of intolerance. Stretching right back to Kant, through the Frankfurt School and up to today, liberalism means that we can do anything we like as long as we don't hurt others. This means that if we are tolerant of others' intolerance - especially when that intolerance is a call for genocide - then all we are doing is allowing that intolerance to flourish, and allowing the violence that will spring from that intolerance to continue unabated." - Bren Carlill

 

Offline iamzack

  • 26
Re: Israel ****s it up, BAD
What's the difference between a Palestinian civilian killing an Israeli civilian and an Israeli civilian killing a Palestinian civilian?

In the former scenario, the result is another 500 dead Palestinians.


Also-- funny link, Sandwich. The really sad thing is that the "terrorists" kids still don't have toys to play with, despite their parents' sacrifice.
(See what I did there? Quotes! Because it's a war, and civilians die in wars! Who cares, until it's American or Israeli civilians, though, amirite?)
WE ARE HARD LIGHT PRODUCTIONS. YOU WILL LOWER YOUR FIREWALLS AND SURRENDER YOUR KEYBOARDS. WE WILL ADD YOUR INTELLECTUAL AND VERNACULAR DISTINCTIVENESS TO OUR OWN. YOUR FORUMS WILL ADAPT TO SERVICE US. RESISTANCE IS FUTILE.

 

Offline Sandwich

  • Got Screen?
  • 213
    • Skype
    • Steam
    • Twitter
    • Brainzipper
Re: Israel ****s it up, BAD
What's the difference between a Palestinian civilian killing an Israeli civilian and an Israeli civilian killing a Palestinian civilian?

In the former scenario, the result is another 500 dead Palestinians.


Also-- funny link, Sandwich. The really sad thing is that the "terrorists" kids still don't have toys to play with, despite their parents' sacrifice.
(See what I did there? Quotes! Because it's a war, and civilians die in wars! Who cares, until it's American or Israeli civilians, though, amirite?)

What are you talking about? I don't particularly care who's doing the killing (civvies or military) as I do who's getting killed (civvies or military).

The rest of your post doesn't make any sense to my 4:30am brain. Perhaps tomorrow it will - sorry.
SERIOUSLY...! | {The Sandvich Bar} - Rhino-FS2 Tutorial | CapShip Turret Upgrade | The Complete FS2 Ship List | System Background Package

"...The quintessential quality of our age is that of dreams coming true. Just think of it. For centuries we have dreamt of flying; recently we made that come true: we have always hankered for speed; now we have speeds greater than we can stand: we wanted to speak to far parts of the Earth; we can: we wanted to explore the sea bottom; we have: and so  on, and so on: and, too, we wanted the power to smash our enemies utterly; we have it. If we had truly wanted peace, we should have had that as well. But true peace has never been one of the genuine dreams - we have got little further than preaching against war in order to appease our consciences. The truly wishful dreams, the many-minded dreams are now irresistible - they become facts." - 'The Outward Urge' by John Wyndham

"The very essence of tolerance rests on the fact that we have to be intolerant of intolerance. Stretching right back to Kant, through the Frankfurt School and up to today, liberalism means that we can do anything we like as long as we don't hurt others. This means that if we are tolerant of others' intolerance - especially when that intolerance is a call for genocide - then all we are doing is allowing that intolerance to flourish, and allowing the violence that will spring from that intolerance to continue unabated." - Bren Carlill

 

Offline iamzack

  • 26
Re: Israel ****s it up, BAD
Well, since Palestine doesn't actually have a real military as far as I'm aware, it's all civvies. Just because a civilian gets a gun doesn't make them a soldier. Or a terrorist.
WE ARE HARD LIGHT PRODUCTIONS. YOU WILL LOWER YOUR FIREWALLS AND SURRENDER YOUR KEYBOARDS. WE WILL ADD YOUR INTELLECTUAL AND VERNACULAR DISTINCTIVENESS TO OUR OWN. YOUR FORUMS WILL ADAPT TO SERVICE US. RESISTANCE IS FUTILE.

 

Offline Scotty

  • 1.21 gigawatts!
  • 211
  • Guns, guns, guns.
Re: Israel ****s it up, BAD
When said civvie uses that gun or any other weapon, they become a combatant.