Author Topic: Prop 8 = toast (pending appeals)  (Read 7430 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline MP-Ryan

  • Makes General Discussion Make Sense.
  • Global Moderator
  • 210
  • Keyboard > Pen > Sword
Prop 8 = toast (pending appeals)
http://www.cnn.com/2010/US/08/04/california.same.sex.ruling/index.html?hpt=T2

Glad to see the rule of law trumps regional bigotry.  Hopefully the higher courts will uphold the same principles.
"In the beginning, the Universe was created.  This made a lot of people very angry and has widely been regarded as a bad move."  [Douglas Adams]

 

Offline General Battuta

  • Poe's Law In Action
  • 214
  • i wonder when my postcount will exceed my iq
Re: Prop 8 = toast (pending appeals)
I been celebrating all day!

The decision was heavy on factual findings which appeals courts aren't allowed to touch, so odds of an appeal reversing this decision are low.

 

Offline NGTM-1R

  • I reject your reality and substitute my own
  • 213
  • Syndral Active. 0410.
Re: Prop 8 = toast (pending appeals)
TAKE THAT CONSERVATIVE LUNACY!

Maybe we can keep the E-bay exec from being elected too.
"Load sabot. Target Zaku, direct front!"

A Feddie Story

 

Offline Scotty

  • 1.21 gigawatts!
  • 211
  • Guns, guns, guns.
Re: Prop 8 = toast (pending appeals)
Cheers California!

 

Offline Galemp

  • Actual father of Samus
  • 212
  • Ask me about GORT!
    • Steam
    • User page on the FreeSpace Wiki
Re: Prop 8 = toast (pending appeals)
Fantastic! I am gonna be in San Francisco this weekend, it's gonna be such a great atmosphere.
"Anyone can do any amount of work, provided it isn't the work he's supposed to be doing at that moment." -- Robert Benchley

Members I've personally met: RedStreblo, Goober5000, Sandwich, Splinter, Su-tehp, Hippo, CP5670, Terran Emperor, Karajorma, Dekker, McCall, Admiral Wolf, mxlm, RedSniper, Stealth, Black Wolf...

 

Offline mxlm

  • 29
Re: Prop 8 = toast (pending appeals)
Eat it, bigots.
I will ask that you explain yourself. Please do so with the clear understanding that I may decide I am angry enough to destroy all of you and raze this sickening mausoleum of fraud down to the naked rock it stands on.

 

Offline blowfish

  • 211
  • Join the cult of KILL MY ROUTER!!!!!!!!!!1
Re: Prop 8 = toast (pending appeals)
Yay.  Let's just hope the Supreme Court upholds the decision.

 

Offline Nuke

  • Ka-Boom!
  • 212
  • Mutants Worship Me
Re: Prop 8 = toast (pending appeals)
i really dont care what happens to california. it can sink into the ocean for all i care.
I can no longer sit back and allow communist infiltration, communist indoctrination, communist subversion, and the international communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids.

Nuke's Scripting SVN

  

Offline Turambar

  • Determined to inflict his entire social circle on us
  • 210
  • You can't spell Manslaughter without laughter
Re: Prop 8 = toast (pending appeals)
anyone want to go get gay married?
10:55:48   TurambarBlade: i've been selecting my generals based on how much i like their hats
10:55:55   HerraTohtori: me too!
10:56:01   HerraTohtori: :D

 

Offline iamzack

  • 26
Re: Prop 8 = toast (pending appeals)
oo me
WE ARE HARD LIGHT PRODUCTIONS. YOU WILL LOWER YOUR FIREWALLS AND SURRENDER YOUR KEYBOARDS. WE WILL ADD YOUR INTELLECTUAL AND VERNACULAR DISTINCTIVENESS TO OUR OWN. YOUR FORUMS WILL ADAPT TO SERVICE US. RESISTANCE IS FUTILE.

 
Sig nuked! New one coming soon!

 

Offline Flipside

  • əp!sd!l£
  • 212
Re: Prop 8 = toast (pending appeals)
You want to be Object Oriented?

Damn, I'm a nerd.... Besides, in Zack's case, that could almost be considered true... :p

 

Offline iamzack

  • 26
Re: Prop 8 = toast (pending appeals)
now, if california could just legalize weed as well...
WE ARE HARD LIGHT PRODUCTIONS. YOU WILL LOWER YOUR FIREWALLS AND SURRENDER YOUR KEYBOARDS. WE WILL ADD YOUR INTELLECTUAL AND VERNACULAR DISTINCTIVENESS TO OUR OWN. YOUR FORUMS WILL ADAPT TO SERVICE US. RESISTANCE IS FUTILE.

 

Offline BloodEagle

  • 210
  • Bleeding Paradox!
    • Steam
Re: Prop 8 = toast (pending appeals)
i really dont care what happens to california. it can sink into the ocean for all i care.

Aside from their cows, I agree. 

We'll be needin' tah' rustle them thar' cattle a'fore it'n joins 'lantis in tha' deep, else the price of milk will skyrocket.  And, hey, free ribeye for the roadtrip.

 

Offline swashmebuckle

  • 210
  • Das Lied von der Turd
    • The Perfect Band
Re: Prop 8 = toast (pending appeals)
we win we win! but I'm still not voting for you Newsom

 

Offline Nuke

  • Ka-Boom!
  • 212
  • Mutants Worship Me
Re: Prop 8 = toast (pending appeals)
i really dont give a **** if gays marry or not. its not like marriage is what it used to be. divorce is such big buisness that there are now national chains of divorce mills. furthermore i believe that marriage should have nothing to do with the government (and vice versa). as an old conservative i used to know liked to point out, it was really all about money and that the government didnt want to give benefits to their employees' families if these families were gay spouses (the same applies to the private sector as well). then there's a matter of tax codes. could you claim a gay spouse as a dependent on your taxes if he was the home maker in the relationship? could two lesbians file jointly if they pool their income? i personally think that gay marriage would only require minor revisions to the tax codes. then theres a matter of gays with children. a few gay men may have children from failed relationships with women, but most will need to adopt. there are massive pools of kids in temporary foster care would would benefit from stable households regardless of the sexual orientation of the parents, in this case gay marriage actually helps to solve an existing problem.
I can no longer sit back and allow communist infiltration, communist indoctrination, communist subversion, and the international communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids.

Nuke's Scripting SVN

 
Re: Prop 8 = toast (pending appeals)
i really dont give a **** if gays marry or not. its not like marriage is what it used to be. divorce is such big buisness that there are now national chains of divorce mills. furthermore i believe that marriage should have nothing to do with the government (and vice versa). as an old conservative i used to know liked to point out, it was really all about money and that the government didnt want to give benefits to their employees' families if these families were gay spouses (the same applies to the private sector as well). then there's a matter of tax codes. could you claim a gay spouse as a dependent on your taxes if he was the home maker in the relationship? could two lesbians file jointly if they pool their income? i personally think that gay marriage would only require minor revisions to the tax codes. then theres a matter of gays with children. a few gay men may have children from failed relationships with women, but most will need to adopt. there are massive pools of kids in temporary foster care would would benefit from stable households regardless of the sexual orientation of the parents, in this case gay marriage actually helps to solve an existing problem.

That last bit is part of why I think gay marriage is good, but begs the question, if gay marriage becomes widespread, what's to stop mothers with unwanted children saying 'throw 'em in an orphanage, some homo will adopt them'
Sig nuked! New one coming soon!

 

Offline General Battuta

  • Poe's Law In Action
  • 214
  • i wonder when my postcount will exceed my iq
Re: Prop 8 = toast (pending appeals)
i really dont give a **** if gays marry or not. its not like marriage is what it used to be. divorce is such big buisness that there are now national chains of divorce mills. furthermore i believe that marriage should have nothing to do with the government (and vice versa). as an old conservative i used to know liked to point out, it was really all about money and that the government didnt want to give benefits to their employees' families if these families were gay spouses (the same applies to the private sector as well). then there's a matter of tax codes. could you claim a gay spouse as a dependent on your taxes if he was the home maker in the relationship? could two lesbians file jointly if they pool their income? i personally think that gay marriage would only require minor revisions to the tax codes. then theres a matter of gays with children. a few gay men may have children from failed relationships with women, but most will need to adopt. there are massive pools of kids in temporary foster care would would benefit from stable households regardless of the sexual orientation of the parents, in this case gay marriage actually helps to solve an existing problem.

That last bit is part of why I think gay marriage is good, but begs the question, if gay marriage becomes widespread, what's to stop mothers with unwanted children saying 'throw 'em in an orphanage, some homo will adopt them'

There are so many kids already in need of adoptive parents that any increase in the supply will be a good thing.

And that scare tactic you're suggesting is at the moment totally baseless. Any data to support?

 

Offline Nuke

  • Ka-Boom!
  • 212
  • Mutants Worship Me
Re: Prop 8 = toast (pending appeals)
those women with unwanted children would clearly not make good parents anyway. there is clearly something wrong with them. most women get totally brainwashed when they have kids and wouldn't give them up for any reason. i dont think gays getting married and being allowed to adopt children will have any effect on the number of babies that get thrown out by their mothers. it might even motivate some of them to keep their babies.
I can no longer sit back and allow communist infiltration, communist indoctrination, communist subversion, and the international communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids.

Nuke's Scripting SVN

 

Offline Scotty

  • 1.21 gigawatts!
  • 211
  • Guns, guns, guns.
Re: Prop 8 = toast (pending appeals)
Would that be better or worse than dangerous abortions?