Author Topic: To distract people from the gay bird debate....  (Read 4223 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

To distract people from the gay bird debate....
http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/08/iraq_the_war_that_broke_us_not.html

It's pretty long, has an image or 2 in it and I'm lazy today so I won't copy it.
'Teeth of the Tiger' - campaign in the making
Story, Ships, Weapons, Project Leader.

 

Offline karajorma

  • King Louie - Jungle VIP
  • Administrator
  • 214
    • Karajorma's Freespace FAQ
Re: To distract people from the gay bird debate....
I'm just going to wait for someone to post the article debunking it.
Karajorma's Freespace FAQ. It's almost like asking me yourself.

[ Diaspora ] - [ Seeds Of Rebellion ] - [ Mind Games ]

 

Offline Bob-san

  • Wishes he was cool
  • 210
  • It's 5 minutes to midnight.
Re: To distract people from the gay bird debate....
I'm just going to say that the site is a load of garbage. Just looking over recent articles has them calling Obama Muslim and a bunch of other bull****. The only way they could have less credibility would be to declare that the ocean has dried up and that pigs are really aliens from outer space.
NGTM-1R: Currently considering spending the rest of the day in bed cuddling.
GTSVA: With who...?
Nuke: chewbacca?
Bob-san: The Rancor.

 

Offline Sushi

  • Art Critic
  • 211
Re: To distract people from the gay bird debate....
I'm just going to wait for someone to post the article debunking it.

I'm just going to say that the site is a load of garbage. Just looking over recent articles has them calling Obama Muslim and a bunch of other bull****. The only way they could have less credibility would be to declare that the ocean has dried up and that pigs are really aliens from outer space.

I'm wary too: the Iraq war cost numbers look suspiciously low. but until someone can dig up something disproving the claims, I have to at least pay some attention to it. I'm not interested in "we'll ignore you because you're not a credible source": I want a solid rebuttal. :)

I do think that the basic premise, that Iraq war spending is not as big of a factor in the deficit as people give it credit for, probably has some merit.

What I really would like to see is a complete, hierarchical breakdown of all federal government spending. A visualization like this would be perfect, and would make it a lot easier for Average Joes like me to evaluate which quoted statistics are true, which are technically true but highly cherrypicked, and which are utter crap.

 

Offline Bob-san

  • Wishes he was cool
  • 210
  • It's 5 minutes to midnight.
Re: To distract people from the gay bird debate....
That article in specific (the one the OP supplied) is a half-interesting reading. I'm more curious about the economic impact of the war than just a budgetary deficit. Further, this war has been going on for soon 9 years now. It's impossible to say with ANY certainty where we'd have been had we not went into Iraq. It could be anything--we could have had a new golden age, a bigger economic collapse, a war with a large power (N. Korea, perhaps), et cetera.

Now then, a credible publication with credible authors who are experts in their fields would be one thing. A conservative site which regularly flings mud and has relative nobodies writing for it has the credibility of a tabloid. Sure, some things might be true. However, most of it is one tiny aspect being zoomed in upon a thousand times over.
NGTM-1R: Currently considering spending the rest of the day in bed cuddling.
GTSVA: With who...?
Nuke: chewbacca?
Bob-san: The Rancor.

 
Re: To distract people from the gay bird debate....
anyone know how those fiqures compare to the financial cost of other wars?

 

Offline Scotty

  • 1.21 gigawatts!
  • 211
  • Guns, guns, guns.
Re: To distract people from the gay bird debate....
Adjusted for inflation, or not?

 

Offline NGTM-1R

  • I reject your reality and substitute my own
  • 213
  • Syndral Active. 0410.
Re: To distract people from the gay bird debate....
Adjusted for inflation it's nothing compared to the World Wars, but that's hardly surprising.
"Load sabot. Target Zaku, direct front!"

A Feddie Story

 
Re: To distract people from the gay bird debate....
What worries me is that, in 2007, the Iraq war was apperently the only thing worth investing in 0_o.

Oh, and. Didn't I read somewhere that Iraq and Afghani war spendings were... classified or something?

 

Offline Bob-san

  • Wishes he was cool
  • 210
  • It's 5 minutes to midnight.
Re: To distract people from the gay bird debate....
What worries me is that, in 2007, the Iraq war was apperently the only thing worth investing in 0_o.

Oh, and. Didn't I read somewhere that Iraq and Afghani war spendings were... classified or something?
Wrong. That chart is of the budgetary deficit. In 2007, the chart (claims) says that the lowest deficit since 2002 was primarily composed of Iraq war spending. Without the war, the deficit would have been much smaller but the overall government debt would still have increased.

Now then, the real issue is that Obama has greatly increased the overall national debt (as well as the budgetary deficit). If, within the next decade or two, politicians continue to spend more money than the USA makes, the interest payment on the debt will exceed government revenue and thus the debt will accumulate faster. In fact, at that point, there may be three options. The first is to print enough money to repay the debt, causing a period of severe inflation which may be difficult to stop or at least slow. The second is to declare war on major lenders and basically destroy them or at least their ability to be repaid. The third is to overthrow the Federal Government and replace it with either one or multiple new governments.

Of all options, causing massive inflation would be the safest but also will rebury the USA. Timing would be everything. A major war might be a good second choice but will have a large risk and possibly long-standing international consequences. The third choice may be the most dangerous as a war against the federal government would be tough--they control various espionage agencies and the military, so getting the wheels turning on revolution would be difficult unless these parts of the government defect. If they don't defect, the revolt is basically crushed. It also has the possibility to turn from revolution to civil war and end with multiple wars. It also would leave us the most vulnerable to large wars--we might not have to declare war on an enemy as they'll declare a war on us. That said, we have relative security thanks to our geographic location, but any half-industrial or half-developed country could invade. The prevalence of nuclear weapons is also scary as there are too many scenarios to account for.
« Last Edit: August 25, 2010, 02:12:47 pm by Bob-san »
NGTM-1R: Currently considering spending the rest of the day in bed cuddling.
GTSVA: With who...?
Nuke: chewbacca?
Bob-san: The Rancor.

 

Offline redsniper

  • 211
  • Aim for the Top!
Re: To distract people from the gay bird debate....
I think lenders will still come calling no matter what government's in charge.
"Think about nice things not unhappy things.
The future makes happy, if you make it yourself.
No war; think about happy things."   -WouterSmitssm

Hard Light Productions:
"...this conversation is pointlessly confrontational."

 

Offline Scotty

  • 1.21 gigawatts!
  • 211
  • Guns, guns, guns.
Re: To distract people from the gay bird debate....
If a company that owes you money goes out of business, and another company that doesn't owe you money moves into the abandoned building, do you push to get your money from them?

  

Offline NGTM-1R

  • I reject your reality and substitute my own
  • 213
  • Syndral Active. 0410.
Re: To distract people from the gay bird debate....
If a company that owes you money goes out of business, and another company that doesn't owe you money moves into the abandoned building, do you push to get your money from them?

If said company has also taken all their other assets, yes.

EDIT: Also, I gotta ask. What "gay bird debate"? You wouldn't be trying to delegitimize something based on non-existant controversy like some kind of intelligent design proponent would you Bengal?
« Last Edit: August 25, 2010, 02:38:28 pm by NGTM-1R »
"Load sabot. Target Zaku, direct front!"

A Feddie Story

 

Offline Bob-san

  • Wishes he was cool
  • 210
  • It's 5 minutes to midnight.
Re: To distract people from the gay bird debate....
If a company that owes you money goes out of business, and another company that doesn't owe you money moves into the abandoned building, do you push to get your money from them?
If they bought the debts, then yes they may. The point would be to say "we aien't repayin' no stink debt!" Likewise, the debts don't have to be purchased. If there were, say, two new national governments, each could refuse and say that it's not their debt and try to blame the other. Likewise, if there's only one, they can still refuse and so the lenders are screwed


Retrieving all money lent is not a sure thing. In this case, the government entity is legally dead and thus any debts it carries are dead as well. If Grandpa Joe dies and is survived by Grandma Jane, it's Grandma Jane's debt. If Grandma Jane's estate shrivels up and she dies, then the worst that can happen for her children is to have no estate to inherit from. What Grandma Jane might try to do is to give away family heirlooms prior to her death--they can't take and sell what she no longer owns. Likewise, Grandma Jane could give away all remaining assets to charity or otherwise hide them and, upon her death, whatever assets she has are still not enough to repay her debt and thus her estate would be seized.

Lending isn't a sure thing. There are risks involved--one of which is losing your money.
NGTM-1R: Currently considering spending the rest of the day in bed cuddling.
GTSVA: With who...?
Nuke: chewbacca?
Bob-san: The Rancor.

 

Offline Qent

  • 29
Re: To distract people from the gay bird debate....
EDIT: Also, I gotta ask. What "gay bird debate"? You wouldn't be trying to delegitimize something based on non-existant controversy like some kind of intelligent design proponent would you Bengal?
The one you just posted in. :P

 

Offline NGTM-1R

  • I reject your reality and substitute my own
  • 213
  • Syndral Active. 0410.
Re: To distract people from the gay bird debate....
"Load sabot. Target Zaku, direct front!"

A Feddie Story

 

Offline Aardwolf

  • 211
  • Posts: 16,384
Re: To distract people from the gay bird debate....
Budget deficit, eh? > 300% discrepancy, they say?

Is this the thing where they tried to get away with not counting the defense budget as being part of the budget?

Or am I remembering stuff that never happened, again?

 

Offline Turambar

  • Determined to inflict his entire social circle on us
  • 210
  • You can't spell Manslaughter without laughter
Re: To distract people from the gay bird debate....
Emergency spending, Aard.
10:55:48   TurambarBlade: i've been selecting my generals based on how much i like their hats
10:55:55   HerraTohtori: me too!
10:56:01   HerraTohtori: :D

 

Offline General Battuta

  • Poe's Law In Action
  • 214
  • i wonder when my postcount will exceed my iq
Re: To distract people from the gay bird debate....
There's a gay bird debate?

Looks like a perfectly sensible gay bird acknowledgment to me. There's so much homosexuality in nature you'd need an agenda to miss it.

 

Offline Bob-san

  • Wishes he was cool
  • 210
  • It's 5 minutes to midnight.
Re: To distract people from the gay bird debate....
Emergency spending, Aard.
The interesting thing about that is the majority has been repaid and the remainder will also be repaid in due time. In the long-term, it was probably a <$50m loss (thanks to inflation).
NGTM-1R: Currently considering spending the rest of the day in bed cuddling.
GTSVA: With who...?
Nuke: chewbacca?
Bob-san: The Rancor.