, but in addition, the right-wing movement never crystallized in Germany, as a certain Hitler-shaped focal point was missing.
Not to make a political argument but the idea that it was a right wing movement doesn't really jar right with me considering they are called the "National Socialist Workers Party" where 'Socialist' is by definition a left-wing movement and that they are fascist dictators which represent total government control... which is also a definition of far left in contrast to far right which would equate to total anarchy.... Obviously there was not anarchy after the big N's took control. And they were anti capitalism too, which is a right leaning philosophy. Sooo... how is this classified as a right movement anyways if they don't run the 'Small Government' mantra
? Am I missing something
?
Oh, brother.
First off, you are talking to a German.
Second, you have the axes of your political diagram mixed up. Neither left nor right are associated with authoritarianism vs. anarchy. The Nazi Party was ultra-right wing and horribly authoritarian. Soviet Communism was ultra-left wing and horribly authoritarian.
They were both on the authoritarian end of this diagram:

All historically important political philosophies can be plotted here. Anarchy is a left-wing, highly libertarian notion. Fascism is a right-wing, highly authoritarian notion. Soviet Communism was a left-wing, highly authoritarian notion.
The notion that 'right wing' is associated with 'small government, pro-capitalism' is something very recent, very specifically American, and very much not applicable to Germany circa 1930-1940. Today's American right wing movement is very liberal compared to the Nazis, and depending on who you talk to, oscillates between somewhat libertarian (small government, expanded freedoms) and somewhat authoritarian (Bush-style big government, legislation of social issues, etc.)