That post was misguided on several levels. Allow me to conduct a postmortem.
I have full faith and confidence in Sab0o's abilities to make a dynamic texture that fits this model.
You're implying here that those who criticize lack this faith, when it's explicitly been expressed.
I don't understand all the posts complaining that it's not like the original.
Here you're introducing a straw man. The complaints are not that it is not like the original, the complaints are that it has deviated too far from the original but does not offer enough reward in return.
Every single one of General Battuta's points can be applied to the original Medusa. It's a flat, boring, washed out texture that should only be used as a general guide.
No they can't. I'll walk you through it.
1. This texture is monochrome. It lacks weathering or wear. Notice the heavy scoring along the front end of the secondary banks on the original texture. This creates the impression that the ship is new, high-tech, sleek, and immaculate, which is a sharp deviation from the McQuarry-esque design of the original. (This is probably in no small part because Sab0o hasn't had the chance to add the weathering yet, but the Boanerges was very lightly weathered, so it's a valid point to raise.)
2. This texture is strongly green-blue and slightly reflective. The original was gray and industrial, with blackened machine areas now modeled in. The general color balance needs to be preserved because it impacts the snap recognizability of the model. Again, see the departure in art styles.
The issue you seem to be having is the mistaken belief that these criticisms somehow reflect criticisms of Sab0o's skills. They do not. They are meant as guidance to improve the texture. Sab0o posted the texture with the (now explicitly stated) hope of receiving such feedback. He has received it. If you have a problem with this process, you seem to lack full faith and confidence in Sab0o's abilities to create a dynamic texture that fits this model, rendering the first sentence of your post questionable.