No, the ARTIST can do as they see fit. And the FSU (based on public opinion and TEAM aesthetics) can decide whether or not it is acceptable enough to include in the MediaVPs. And if some thing, any thing, is so controversial that TEAM and Public opinion are solidly against it, we will NOT simply apply a "stfu, it's going in anyway" behaviour.
However, with that said, I would like to address, again, the fact of feedback and input delivered. And not just in relation to the Medusa, but to all works done. Opinions and aesthetics differ. Disagreements will be had. Behaviours will happen that people will use against each other months and years on end. But the real opinions that matter are the constructive ones. The well formed ones that leave personal conjecture out of them. And the ones that happen closer to a models completion rather than its infancy.
It requires a fair amount of trust, and it's a trust that needs to go both ways. Especially seeing as how at this point in time, we have more work available and in front of us than we've ever had before. The results of which are going to take a while, but will be well worth it.
And besides, we'll also be doing our best to make sure that these models are available prior to the Release and we'll be doing additional drafting for Beta Testing as pre-Release flight checks, so there will be more than enough time for any truly outstanding issues to be addressed. Because the last thing that -I- personally want to hear about it somebody requesting an older version of something (outside of attempting to address a performance issue, and hopefully we'll be seeing less of that, especially since I happen to Approve of the MediaVP-Lite Edition being worked on)
To keep this on topic and return it to discussion on the Medusa: I love the model, and I trust in Sab0o to collaborate and communicate while the work is in progress to produce something outstanding.