I have trouble reading condemnation in any other way, since in christian doctrine, there are only two metaphysical places where you eventually end up in. If you are "condemned", I don't see how it can be a condemnation if you're sent to heaven.
Ok, here's another one for your semantical criticisms:
"The cowardly, the unbelieving, the vile...the idolaters and all liars - their place will be in the fiery lake of burning sulpher. This is the second death." (Revelation 21:8)
By unbelieving, we can, as you undoubtedly will, ask "in what?". Well, in the christian doctrine, surely. In God. And Christ
is god in the christian doctrine. This is obvious for any christian, and the meaning of that phrase as well. But if you press enough, we can also agree that it may be read in a more ambiguous way.
Ok. I'll accept that. It still calls for atheists to be burnt in hell.
Now we have two sentences that you may not believe (but most christians do, so...) in the meaning I'm attributing to them, but they are still both immoral, even if you don't buy into this interpretation, and just accept that in the first God condemns people for not being gullible to his son, while the second condemns atheists to the "fiery lake of burning sulpher".