Author Topic: Touchscreen functionality without the (ew) touching!  (Read 6306 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Klaustrophobia

  • 210
  • the REAL Nuke of HLP
    • North Carolina Tigers
Re: Touchscreen functionality without the (ew) touching!
i recently had to sign with my finger to pay for lunch at a place that used an ipad as their cash register.  nevermind not looking ANYTHING like my signature, i didn't even manage to stay inside the box. 
I like to stare at the sun.

 

Offline Mongoose

  • Rikki-Tikki-Tavi
  • Global Moderator
  • 212
  • This brain for rent.
    • Steam
    • Something
Re: Touchscreen functionality without the (ew) touching!
Without a proper stylus, I can't stand touchscreens.

 

Offline Dragon

  • Citation needed
  • 212
  • The sky is the limit.
Re: Touchscreen functionality without the (ew) touching!
i recently had to sign with my finger to pay for lunch at a place that used an ipad as their cash register.  nevermind not looking ANYTHING like my signature, i didn't even manage to stay inside the box.
As if they couldn't just take your fingerprint...
That would seriously make "signing" things much easier, one touch and you're good to go. Not to mention it's rather difficult to counterfeit.

 

Offline Kolgena

  • 211
Re: Touchscreen functionality without the (ew) touching!
There may be privacy issues and such if everyone's fingerprint were so readily available like that.

Have to agree about finger touchpads. I hate my fingers when trying to do work on my iphone. They're way too fat to be accurate, and they also block out all of what I need to look at when clicking something.

 

Offline Dragon

  • Citation needed
  • 212
  • The sky is the limit.
Re: Touchscreen functionality without the (ew) touching!
There may be privacy issues and such if everyone's fingerprint were so readily available like that.
Well, as I understand it, one's fingerprint is just like a signature, except more reliable. I don't know what privacy issues would be there (afterall, if you signed something, then your signature is also readily available).

 

Offline BloodEagle

  • 210
  • Bleeding Paradox!
    • Steam
Re: Touchscreen functionality without the (ew) touching!
There may be privacy issues and such if everyone's fingerprint were so readily available like that.
Well, as I understand it, one's fingerprint is just like a signature, except more reliable. I don't know what privacy issues would be there (afterall, if you signed something, then your signature is also readily available).

Law enforcement databases.  Fingerprint forgery.  Etc.

 

Offline Klaustrophobia

  • 210
  • the REAL Nuke of HLP
    • North Carolina Tigers
Re: Touchscreen functionality without the (ew) touching!
a fingerprint is a hell of a lot more personal and identifying than a signature.  it would be kinda like using your SSN to "sign" for things.  (i said KINDA, don't go shooting holes in that!)
I like to stare at the sun.

 

Offline Scotty

  • 1.21 gigawatts!
  • 211
  • Guns, guns, guns.
Re: Touchscreen functionality without the (ew) touching!
It's also relatively trivial to lift a fingerprint from something, if slightly more difficult to actually do anything with it.  Still possible, though.

 

Offline z64555

  • 210
  • Self-proclaimed controls expert
    • Steam
Re: Touchscreen functionality without the (ew) touching!
Retinal scans FTL.
Secure the Source, Contain the Code, Protect the Project
chief1983

------------
funtapaz: Hunchon University biologists prove mankind is evolving to new, higher form of life, known as Homopithecus Juche.
z64555: s/J/Do
BotenAlfred: <funtapaz> Hunchon University biologists prove mankind is evolving to new, higher form of life, known as Homopithecus Douche.

 

Offline Kolgena

  • 211
Re: Touchscreen functionality without the (ew) touching!
Also, with signatures, you have to have volition to leave one behind. With fingerprints, you don't have control over when you "distribute" them, which is pretty much all the time. It'd be like if your shoes were dipped in ink and stamped your signature wherever you went.

 

Offline Mikes

  • 29
Re: Touchscreen functionality without the (ew) touching!
Without a proper stylus, I can't stand touchscreens.

Using any stylus on any capacitive touchscreen is an outright horrible experience in my eyes. Touchscreens simply do not have the sensor coverage to allow any kind of precision pen input...  nor do they need to, as they are built for fingers, not pens. As a result thoese "styli" that are sold are sadly just ridiculous novelties/toys and simply unsuited for getting anything done.



What you want is an activice digitizer (i.e. WACOM tech). Then you get a proper precise pen that works like a proper pen should.
« Last Edit: May 26, 2012, 05:35:00 am by Mikes »

 

Offline Klaustrophobia

  • 210
  • the REAL Nuke of HLP
    • North Carolina Tigers
Re: Touchscreen functionality without the (ew) touching!
stylus.. es(?) worked quite well in the brief era of PDAs.  we could just go back to whatever kinds of screens those were.
I like to stare at the sun.

 

Offline The E

  • He's Ebeneezer Goode
  • 213
  • Nothing personal, just tech support.
    • Steam
    • Twitter
Re: Touchscreen functionality without the (ew) touching!
Those were called resistive screens. To be perfectly honest, I don't see how going back to them would be an improvement, giving that capacitative screens are much less susceptible to damage, and that good capacitative screens are quite accurate.
If I'm just aching this can't go on
I came from chasing dreams to feel alone
There must be changes, miss to feel strong
I really need lifе to touch me
--Evergrey, Where August Mourns

 

Offline Mongoose

  • Rikki-Tikki-Tavi
  • Global Moderator
  • 212
  • This brain for rent.
    • Steam
    • Something
Re: Touchscreen functionality without the (ew) touching!
Without a proper stylus, I can't stand touchscreens.

Using any stylus on any capacitive touchscreen is an outright horrible experience in my eyes. Touchscreens simply do not have the sensor coverage to allow any kind of precision pen input...  nor do they need to, as they are built for fingers, not pens. As a result thoese "styli" that are sold are sadly just ridiculous novelties/toys and simply unsuited for getting anything done.
I'm not talking about using a stylus on a normal touchscreen designed for hands, but sytems that are designed for styli from the get-go.  I'm mostly thinking about the Nintendo DS from personal experience, but on the tablet side of things, I've seen ads for some model that incorporates one.

 
Re: Touchscreen functionality without the (ew) touching!
I'm not talking about using a stylus on a normal touchscreen designed for hands, but sytems that are designed for styli from the get-go.  I'm mostly thinking about the Nintendo DS from personal experience, but on the tablet side of things, I've seen ads for some model that incorporates one.

I think the DS touchscreen is resistive. And it shows, if you've used Pictochat to draw, or games where you do stuff like that, like Brain Training. No matter how careful you're being, the lines always come out pixelated and wobbly due to the limitations. Active digitizers like in a Wacom tablet or tablet PC work so much better and smoother.

 

Offline Mongoose

  • Rikki-Tikki-Tavi
  • Global Moderator
  • 212
  • This brain for rent.
    • Steam
    • Something
Re: Touchscreen functionality without the (ew) touching!
Well yeah, but that's also because the original DS has a pretty low-res screen, so even with a better input method, you're still going to get a case of the jaggies.  I'm all for pairing styluses with awesome hi-res surfaces.