Oh come on. You can nominate threads without taking potshots at the threads that are already there; and Scotty, you're a moderator, so your recommendations carry additional weight. Besides, complaining is a poor negotiation strategy.
And it is again necessary to understand the distinction between "good threads"/"thoughtful threads" and "classic threads". I am not really inclined to approve a thread where people debated on an issue or got into an argument, no matter how long it lasted or how many points were made. (The one exception is the "Derek Smart wants to develop FS3" for obvious reasons.)
I've re-read this thread and I don't see sufficient reason to include most of the threads requested, for the reasons karajorma and I previously stated. (This included reading through parts of the threads from the first post, which I didn't do last time.) However, I agree that the "Epic Bughunt Claims Sanity, Human Blood" thread qualifies, so I've moved it to the Classics.
(I briefly considered moving
this very thread to the classics, but then decided it had too much of a hostile tone. Plus, it was recently bumped.

)