Author Topic: Odd behavior with beams  (Read 2836 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Legate Damar

  • Keeping up with the Cardassians
  • 29
  • Hail Cardassia!
Odd behavior with beams
I made a test mission where one super ship was attacked by over 100 enemy capships in 5 waves (the first wave was present at mission start, each subsequent wave jumped in in intervals of one minute).

The supership destroyed the first wave just before the second wave jumped in, then it started firing its beams at the second wave but only destroyed a few of them before it stopped firing.

By the time the fourth wave (the largest one) had jumped in, the fps had gone down to 1 or 2 (this was expected) but what's odd is that the supership only then started firing its beams at the third wave, when they were destroyed it stopped firing its beams for the rest of the mission.

All of the other ships continued to fire their beams, and all of the waves were attacking from different directions (which were all covered by the supership's beam arcs). At no point were any of the supership's turrets destroyed.

Does anyone have any ideas what caused this?

 

Offline headdie

  • i don't use punctuation lol
  • 212
  • Lawful Neutral with a Chaotic outook
    • Skype
    • Twitter
    • Headdie on Deviant Art
Re: Odd behavior with beams
any chance you are exceeding one of these?
http://www.hard-light.net/wiki/index.php/Engine_limitations#Objects

though as usual a log would help greatly
Minister of Interstellar Affairs Sol Union - Retired
quote General Battuta - "FRED is canon!"
Contact me at [email protected]
My Release Thread, Old Release Thread, Celestial Objects Thread, My rubbish attempts at art

 
Re: Odd behavior with beams
I'd say you've the engine's beam or object limit.

nin'd

 

Offline Legate Damar

  • Keeping up with the Cardassians
  • 29
  • Hail Cardassia!
Re: Odd behavior with beams
No, like I said all of the other beams were working fine, and after the third wave was destroyed, there were fewer ships in the mission, but the beams stopped firing after that. They also stopped firing on the second wave before the third wave arrived, yet were firing later when there were many more ships.

 

Offline headdie

  • i don't use punctuation lol
  • 212
  • Lawful Neutral with a Chaotic outook
    • Skype
    • Twitter
    • Headdie on Deviant Art
Re: Odd behavior with beams
in that case definitely need a log
Minister of Interstellar Affairs Sol Union - Retired
quote General Battuta - "FRED is canon!"
Contact me at [email protected]
My Release Thread, Old Release Thread, Celestial Objects Thread, My rubbish attempts at art

 

Offline Legate Damar

  • Keeping up with the Cardassians
  • 29
  • Hail Cardassia!
Re: Odd behavior with beams
I'll get one when I get back to my gaming PC

 

Offline Nyctaeus

  • The Slavic Engineer
  • 212
  • 800k tris ships achieved!
    • Exile
Re: Odd behavior with beams
I have similar problems only for beams for new race. I've retabeled them 3 times but with small improvement. Problem must be somewhere else.
Exile | Shadow Genesis | Inferno | Series Resurrecta  | DA Profile | P3D Profile

Proud owner of NyctiShipyards. Remember - Nyx will fix it!

All of my assets including models, textures, skyboxes, effects may be used under standard CC BY-NC 4.0 license.

 

Offline Legate Damar

  • Keeping up with the Cardassians
  • 29
  • Hail Cardassia!
Re: Odd behavior with beams
Okay, I have a log, but when playing on debug the mission crashed shortly after the third wave arrived (when I first played it it got to the end with no problem):



[attachment deleted by a ninja]

 

Offline MatthTheGeek

  • Captain Obvious
  • 212
  • Frenchie McFrenchface
Re: Odd behavior with beams
Well, you have a ton of warnings all over the place already. Why don't you start by solving all of those ? It's not exactly easy to debug on top a messy modpack.
People are stupid, therefore anything popular is at best suspicious.

Mod management tools     -     Wiki stuff!     -     Help us help you

666maslo666: Releasing a finished product is not a good thing! It is a modern fad.

SpardaSon21: it seems like you exist in a permanent state of half-joking misanthropy

Axem: when you put it like that, i sound like an insane person

bigchunk1: it's not retarded it's american!
bigchunk1: ...

batwota: steele's maneuvering for the coup de gras
MatthTheGeek: you mispelled grâce
Awaesaar: grace
batwota: oh right :P
Darius: ah!
Darius: yes, i like that
MatthTheGeek: the way you just spelled it it means fat
Awaesaar: +accent I forgot how to keyboard
MatthTheGeek: or grease
Darius: the killing fat!
Axem: jabba does the coup de gras
MatthTheGeek: XD
Axem: bring me solo and a cookie

 

Offline Legate Damar

  • Keeping up with the Cardassians
  • 29
  • Hail Cardassia!
Re: Odd behavior with beams
I solved the SAAA one after I saw it, but most of the others are problems with the models which I'm guessing are really not major problems since all of those models have been used in released campaigns already.

 

Offline Dragon

  • Citation needed
  • 212
  • The sky is the limit.
Re: Odd behavior with beams
Open up your models and match the tables to turret names. A lot of warnings are turrets that don't link into the model file.

 

Offline Droid803

  • Trusted poster of legit stuff
  • 213
  • /人 ◕ ‿‿ ◕ 人\ Do you want to be a Magical Girl?
    • Skype
    • Steam
Re: Odd behavior with beams
... which I'm guessing are really not major problems since all of those models have been used in released campaigns already.

NO
That is not the attitude you should have if you want people to help you debug.
I used a lot of models already in released campaigns, such as the UED Solaris, and I still needed to fix them. The UED Solaris as released with WiH initially causes a CRASH TO DESKTOP ERROR if you used its fighterbay in any shape or form, nobody ever found out when playing WiH because the fighterbay was never used (because they couldn't figure out what was wrong with it). And BP is a campaign put out by one of the most skilled teams in FreeSpace modding, with extensive testing and polish. Let that be the shining example of why you should NEVER just assume that just because it's in a released campaign it is bug free in any shape or form. If even they could miss something, don't believe that anyone else managed to catch everything. Always verify and debug your custom assets.

Eliminate every possible source of error that you already know about, or nobody can help you with anything in terms of debugging. (In fact, if you don't, you'll never be able to help yourself either). If you have so much as a single warning, you should fix it before citing "strange behavior", because it may not be strange at all.

(For the record the solaris CTD is an improperly named fighterbay launch path (Bay010), which causes FSO to choke and die when it is picked - the correct name is Bay10. I presume this is fixed in the current release, as I've told multiple people many times)
« Last Edit: June 29, 2012, 12:00:13 pm by Droid803 »
(´・ω・`)
=============================================================

 

Offline Legate Damar

  • Keeping up with the Cardassians
  • 29
  • Hail Cardassia!
Re: Odd behavior with beams
Will work on it

  

Offline Droid803

  • Trusted poster of legit stuff
  • 213
  • /人 ◕ ‿‿ ◕ 人\ Do you want to be a Magical Girl?
    • Skype
    • Steam
Re: Odd behavior with beams
Good :)
(´・ω・`)
=============================================================

 

Offline Aardwolf

  • 211
  • Posts: 16,384
Re: Odd behavior with beams
Asking the obvious question: is it possible the super-ship's beam turrets have been destroyed?

 

Offline Legate Damar

  • Keeping up with the Cardassians
  • 29
  • Hail Cardassia!
Re: Odd behavior with beams
Nope. Nothing in the event log about that, besides the ship was shielded and the shield wasn't breached until very near the end of the battle.