Well that's a loaded question if ever I saw one.
You first.
Here is the midnorthern US at least, a 'normal' person is someone who works 8-14 hour shifts, has a spouse and 2 or 3 kids, is a supporter of either the Republican or Democratic party (it's normal to support either/or), doesn't particularly care about politics, and engages in activities such as watching American Football, watching TV all day, fishing (at least in this region of the country), and going out to eat at a restaurant. This, of course, might be different in another part of the US, or another part of the world.
However, it has been my experience that stereotype of what a 'normal' person is does not usually fit well with what people are really like. At the same time, there is this little paradox that whoever goes too much against what is considered 'normal' generally gets met with a surprising amount of hostility, regardless of how harmless their actions actually are.
Where the hell is this line of questioning going and why don't your responses seem related to what Karaj is saying?
I think I might of misunderstood Karaj's reasons for not caring about Ayn Rand, as her Objectionism philosophy would indeed be considered quite radical within my part of the country, and thus met with hostility from normal citizens and authority figures alike. Most of the people I know would just dismiss anything that goes against their established beliefs as automatically being false.
