Originally posted by Top Gun
But then there's always the danger that AMD will incorporate this into their CPUs. Of course it's less likely because AMDs are generally used by a more technically minded class of users with less tolerance of crippling. However there's always the G4. I doubt steve Jobbs would sell his soul to the MPAA, RIAA and BSA and of course the Chinese may use this to kick start their CPU industry.
Anon: Are you telling me that you're actually capable of removing such offending chips from the motherboard? because that's one hell of a lot of soldering you're going to have to do and you'll have a hell of a lot of broken ones on your hands before you succeed (this is no magic marker thing here). Not to mention that it'll be stuck on the CPU before long which is a very different story.
AMD are more at the mercy of Microsoft than Intel is. Essentially their leap to x86-64 means that M$ HAS to support it for it to get to the "critical mass" to become self-sustaining rather than a dead-end set of instructions like 8.1 pixel shaders (or was it 8.2?)
Essentially, there is very little chance (barring a full-scale revolution) of the general public curbing this threat to their freedom. Just look at it -
we have the G8 conferences, we have the RIAA/MPAA corporate push and finally we have people like Blair and Blunkett and Bush who want to turn the US and UK into police states.
Everyone's realising a little too slowly and the fight (because it WILL come to that) to stop it will be long and painful. I'm not living in a capitalist-driven police state, I don't think anyone else wants to either.