The only difference is that I believe that what the Bible says is true, while you believe (I'm guessing) that what liberal science says is true.
Or were you referring to something else?
Science is not something you "believe" in as the whole point of "science" is to test and retest to find the best model to describe the nature and laws of the universe we inhabit.
"Believers" tend to claim they know certain things to be true because they "believe" in them - sometimes despite verifiable and repeatable tests showing something else entirely.
I.e.: Science is based on logic and reason - not belief.
tl;dr: I believe science by and large reveals to us "the truth" about the physical world around us, but I also realize that it's not "the whole truth", nor is it "nothing but the truth". EDIT: And read the article linked at the bottom of this post. It's truly fascinating.

Seems to me that science most definitely
is a belief system. Does it not require a belief that the tools we've created to measure the world around us are sufficient for the task - bug-free and completely accurate (we
know that to be false - look at the hype a year or so ago about the "discovery" of faster-than-light particles)? That there's nothing to this world besides the observable or measurable (whether directly or indirectly makes no difference)? It's a system jam-packed with theories - theories which, to date, have yet to be disproven, because the moment a theory is proven wrong, it's no longer counted as science.
Yes, there are basic laws (thermodynamics, etc), but can you be 100% certain that those will not also someday be proven wrong - or at least, not supremely accurate? Seems to me that its the height of hubris to presume that our scientific observations are totally, 100% accurate about the world around us. I mean, quantum mechanics has some pretty whack, "illogical" stuff going on, and we've barely scratched the surface.
Now, don't get the wrong impression. I don't believe the world is flat, or the center of the solar system, or any crazy nonsense like that. Sure, some scientific theories I find less believable than others (evolving from one species to another, for example), but in all honesty, I
do put a lot of "faith" in scientific observations about the universe. I suspect that most things that scientists conclude to be fact are pretty accurate and true. I just also keep in mind that there's no way we're anywhere
near understanding
everything there is to know, and that the universe can and does still have many, many surprises in store for us (Hubble Deep Field, anyone?).
"I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with senses, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use and by some other means to give us knowledge which we can attain by them."
- Galileo Galilei
I fully agree, even as far as it influences a Christian's walk of faith. For example, there's the typical example of a Christian who insists on hearing from God which pair of socks to put on in the morning. Most Christians will agree that that's ridiculous. However, what if we make that decision being faced something of more importance? Say, whom to marry? Most Christians would say that you
have to "hear from God" (pardon the Christian lingo) before making a decision of that magnitude.
I disagree.
I see no basis for using God as a life crutch in the Bible. He created us thinking, reasoning human beings, with minds and wills of our own. Throughout the Bible, people went about their own business, doing what seemed wise at the time. The only times I see God "stepping in" and actively telling people to do this or that were times when the rational mind would never have arrived at that course of action. Noah building the ark... Moses striking the rock for water to come out... Gideon attacking the enemy encampment with a whole 300 men... Peter stepping out of the boat onto the water. The pattern I see is that when God wants something "crazy" (from our point of view, with our limited knowledge), He specifically tells us. Otherwise, we have our rational thinking minds, our consciences, and the life guidelines He gave us for living good lives, being nice, helping people in need, not murdering, etc.
I'm actually interested in the definition of 'Science' in this case, since Israel is one of the main R&D countries in the world, I'd like to know whether that is considered 'believing' in Science or 'using' it?
Interesting that you ask about Israel and its approach to science. I'm not sure. If a "belief" in science means a disbelief in God, I think that even the secular Israeli would not fit that description - most secular Israelis still observe the high holidays, despite not considering themselves "religious".
Anyway, I'll end with
this article by Dr. Gerald Schroeder called "The Age of the Universe". It's a 20 minute read or so - and definitely well worth it. In this article, Dr. Schroeder explains how the 14 billion years that science says the universe has been around does
not, in fact, conflict with the Biblical 6 days of creation, but that the two accounts agree with each other.
It is hard at times to reconcile what science says about certain aspects of reality around me with what the Bible teaches, so when someone goes as deep into the historical aspects of the Biblical text as Schroeder does and discovers that there's no contradiction... well, it's stuff like that that I love learning.
