Yes, but that is how public discussion is done nowadays. Scientific reports that are complex, have insightful but subtle reasonings, lots of caveats and nuance, are shared with the public with titles such as "Holy ****, Antartica is breaking apart and we can't stop it anymore", then we have all the Bill Mahers of this world discussing this "Why don't we do smth about this for chrissakes, the world is crumbling apart in front of our very own eyes", while the Limbaughs will just "meh stupid scientists and librals there's ZERO in this", and then they wonder why the US is so "polarized" in their viewpoints. Everyone is in their own ideological bubble and make no efforts whatsoever to peek outside of it. The fault isn't with the people, this is systematic, for instance if the news organizations don't abide to reckless reportings like these they will be ignored against the most reckless ones.