Author Topic: "We need to go into Syria and Iraq and kill as many IS members as we can."  (Read 20581 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline castor

  • 29
    • http://www.ffighters.co.uk./home/
Re: "We need to go into Syria and Iraq and kill as many IS members as we can."
Thing is, IS is something that should definitely not be feared. It's something that will peak and then downfall rather swiftly and spectacularly. It needs only containing and isolation, their suicidal urges will not take too much time into shredding it to nothingness.
Thing is, IS seems to be much more effective than most in making life a suffering for everyone.
I think the solution is, make them fear for a change, more than they are afraid of their god, then bomb them to pieces.

 

Offline Luis Dias

  • 211
Re: "We need to go into Syria and Iraq and kill as many IS members as we can."
I can be behind that plan.

 

Offline Mongoose

  • Rikki-Tikki-Tavi
  • Global Moderator
  • 212
  • This brain for rent.
    • Steam
    • Something
Re: "We need to go into Syria and Iraq and kill as many IS members as we can."
One wonders about some alternate universe where a UN with actual competency and fangs is capable of kicking down the door and yelling OKAY ENOUGH OF THIS BULL**** WE'RE IN CHARGE NOW BECAUSE **** YOU.

 

Offline jr2

  • The Mail Man
  • 212
  • It's prounounced jayartoo 0x6A7232
    • Steam
Re: "We need to go into Syria and Iraq and kill as many IS members as we can."
The UN could be as powerful as it's members agree to be. And therein lies the problem. Certain countries with veto power profit by selling weapons. Others without veto power are actually in favor of tyranny because they themselves are tyrannical.   So...


EDIT: We need a UFN.

United Free Nations. With standards for joining and standards for expulsion.

 

Offline MP-Ryan

  • Makes General Discussion Make Sense.
  • Global Moderator
  • 210
  • Keyboard > Pen > Sword
Re: "We need to go into Syria and Iraq and kill as many IS members as we can."
One wonders about some alternate universe where a UN with actual competency and fangs is capable of kicking down the door and yelling OKAY ENOUGH OF THIS BULL**** WE'RE IN CHARGE NOW BECAUSE **** YOU.

Problem is, the five permanent members of the security council are the primary reason we don't have a competent and effective UN.
"In the beginning, the Universe was created.  This made a lot of people very angry and has widely been regarded as a bad move."  [Douglas Adams]

 

Offline Luis Dias

  • 211
Re: "We need to go into Syria and Iraq and kill as many IS members as we can."
The UN could be as powerful as it's members agree to be. And therein lies the problem. Certain countries with veto power profit by selling weapons. Others without veto power are actually in favor of tyranny because they themselves are tyrannical.   So...


EDIT: We need a UFN.

United Free Nations. With standards for joining and standards for expulsion.

You know, that's what is usually called NATO.

... Yeah, I *know*. Not what you had in mind.

 

Offline jr2

  • The Mail Man
  • 212
  • It's prounounced jayartoo 0x6A7232
    • Steam
Re: "We need to go into Syria and Iraq and kill as many IS members as we can."
Ya isn't NATO currently limited pretty much to the US and Europe.

North Atlantic Treaty Organization and all. ;)

 

Offline Luis Dias

  • 211
Re: "We need to go into Syria and Iraq and kill as many IS members as we can."
"north atlantic treaty organization" that includes turkey come on.

 

Offline jr2

  • The Mail Man
  • 212
  • It's prounounced jayartoo 0x6A7232
    • Steam
Re: "We need to go into Syria and Iraq and kill as many IS members as we can."
The Mediterranean is connected to the North Atlantic...  :nervous: