You are not listening, wouter.
Of course it's not impossible.
It is, however, a LOT of work. Work that will take even a very dedicated person a long time to complete. Work that may not pay off. Work that
we cannot support as part of the SCP, unless the people doing it are willing to join up for several years (Just like we cannot support the Pandora port. Or that console port I remember vaguely).
In short, if you want to see this happen, you will need to find one or more developers willing to do it.
EDIT:
I will also note that we've had this discussion
twice before. Since then, nothing has changed regarding the SCP's ability to do this.
MOAR EDIT:
you dont need to be rude, im not asking you guys to do anything, i was asking about the problems, so see if they can be workaround, there is a lot of people trying to get native C++ apps to run on Android.
It's not really about being rude.
Basically this is a "if you have to ask, you're not even remotely qualified to do it" sort of thing. Which is why people get so annoyed at the question. The level of your understanding of the problem is so far below the level of anyone qualified to fix it that any answer beyond "It's very difficult to do" is a waste of time for the person responding. You're asking for someone to spend a lot of time figuring out exactly what pitfalls would exist in order to port FS2 when you're completely unable to be able to do anything with the answer.
The fact that this question has been asked and answered repeatedly is what is beginning to fray people's nerves. Go actually do some programming on a mobile platform. Then do some coding for FSO and get to understand how the engine works. Once you're in a position where people can see that you actually have a clue about what you're attempting to talk about, you might find them more amenable. But right now, you're just asking pointless questions.
