Originally posted by Rictor
Ok read.
Those resolutions were signed under threat of force. That makes them invalid. Just like confesions signed under threat of force are void, so is this. If Iraq came into the US and said "can you let us poke around a bit, just to make sure", would the US cooperate? The US has NO right to tell another sovereign country what weapons it can and cannot have.
Funny.... EVERY law is "Under Threat". If you steal... threat of jail,...if you murder,...threat of execution,....if you break the speed limit,...threat of a fine. Bad excuse.
And they were UN Resolutions,... not US.
Originally posted by Rictor
Lets see, 300 inspectors, with the best equipment, with 3 months time.. yes I think so. Maybe not enough time to search the entire country, but they would have atleast found SOMETHING. Its pretty hard to hide as many weapons as the US claims Iraq has. PLus, you dont know where the inspectors will go next, so you cant just relocate them.
Heh true ,... if we wait long enough.... they might discover alien lifeforms in Iraq too. Funny though.... in a week Coalition forces have found more than those inspectors did in 2 months. Nothing concrete .... but still ,... more.
Debating the whole issue about the Coalition going into Iraq is a bit Moot now. If it was so evil and ****ing wrong ... why in the hell is the Coalition FORTY TWO countries large and growing?
Granted a good chuck of those countries are simply signing in to get their names in here so they'll benifit from after effects,... but not all of them.
Poll
