Poll

What tactical weapons do you use?

Akhenton SDG
8 (19%)
Morning Star
12 (28.6%)
Lamprey
0 (0%)
Circe
6 (14.3%)
I use tactical weapons when they are default
4 (9.5%)
I never use tactical weapons
12 (28.6%)

Total Members Voted: 42

Voting closed: June 22, 2003, 09:21:04 am

Author Topic: Tactical weapons  (Read 10992 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline DeepSpace9er

  • Bakha bombers rule
  • 28
  • Avoid the beam and you wont get hit
ive never used the lamprey and never will. Why do you need a weapon that merely drains the enemy's power when you can have a weapon that destroys them in 2-5 hits. It might be useful against a cruiser with beams but then again.. thats what a maxim is for.

 

Offline TopAce

  • Stalwart contributor
  • 212
  • FREDder, FSWiki editor, and tester
Lamprey has no affect on larger ships. I think, but I have never examined it.
My community contributions - Get my campaigns from here.

I already announced my retirement twice, yet here I am. If I bring up that topic again, don't believe a word.

 

Offline Mr. Vega

  • Your Node Is Mine
  • 28
  • The ticket to the future is always blank
Kayser/Maxim combo uses way too much energy to be effective in multiplayer, MS/Maxim it becomes more managable. And it is not fun when I can't aim at my opponent because I keep getting pushed backwords while spinning.
Words ought to be a little wild, for they are the assaults of thoughts on the unthinking.
-John Maynard Keynes

 

Offline TopAce

  • Stalwart contributor
  • 212
  • FREDder, FSWiki editor, and tester
Yeah, several ones use the Morning Star at PXO. And severals do not modify their weapons at all. I had a dogfight opponent with Horus, 2 banks of Prom R, and Hornets. I had a Perseus with double Prom S, and double Tempest.

Guess who won ....
My community contributions - Get my campaigns from here.

I already announced my retirement twice, yet here I am. If I bring up that topic again, don't believe a word.

 

Offline Flaser

  • 210
  • man/fish warsie
The Horus is the most underrated interceptor in FS2 'cause it can't carry the heavier weapons.

On the other hand it is the deadliest IMHO.
It was the fastest and almost best armed (in terms of number of guns) interceptor of its time.
"I was going to become a speed dealer. If one stupid fairytale turns out to be total nonsense, what does the young man do? If you answered, “Wake up and face reality,” you don’t remember what it was like being a young man. You just go to the next entry in the catalogue of lies you can use to destroy your life." - John Dolan

 

Offline Havock

  • 27
Quote
Originally posted by Knight Templar
So uh, what's not tactical about the Kayser or Maxim? or both? ;7


depends on the situation.

if there is an enemy bomber squadron 3K away from your destroyer and closing, it would be very tactical to use a kaiser/maxim and put really big holes in them.

 

Offline TopAce

  • Stalwart contributor
  • 212
  • FREDder, FSWiki editor, and tester
Quote
Originally posted by Havock
....use a kaiser/maxim and put really big holes in them.


putting holes in the hull of the enemy is NOT the task of tactical weapons. They are destructive weapon, even it appears quite funny to call a Subach HL-7 destructive.
My community contributions - Get my campaigns from here.

I already announced my retirement twice, yet here I am. If I bring up that topic again, don't believe a word.

 

Offline Havock

  • 27
Quote
Originally posted by TopAce


putting holes in the hull of the enemy is NOT the task of tactical weapons. They are destructive weapon, even it appears quite funny to call a Subach HL-7 destructive.


but it can be a very tactical decision :D

 

Offline Woolie Wool

  • 211
  • Fire main batteries
Quote
Originally posted by TopAce


putting holes in the hull of the enemy is NOT the task of tactical weapons. They are destructive weapon, even it appears quite funny to call a Subach HL-7 destructive.


Do you know what's even funnier? You just called the ML-16 a destructive weapon! The fucking ML-16 LASER!:lol:
16:46   Quanto   ****, a mosquito somehow managed to bite the side of my palm
16:46   Quanto   it itches like hell
16:46   Woolie   !8ball does Quanto have malaria
16:46   BotenAnna   Woolie: The outlook is good.
16:47   Quanto   D:

"did they use anesthetic when they removed your sense of humor or did you have to weep and struggle like a tiny baby"
--General Battuta

 

Offline LtNarol

  • Biased Banshee
  • 211
    • http://www.3dap.com/hlp/hosted/the158th
Personally, I find the Morningstar quite useful, best way to keep someone busy and harmless.  As for the others, just keep in mind that they have their purposes and those purposes aren't always straight up destroy ;)

 

Offline TopAce

  • Stalwart contributor
  • 212
  • FREDder, FSWiki editor, and tester
I have no problem with the MS, just if it were a bit more useful against hull, that would be good.
My community contributions - Get my campaigns from here.

I already announced my retirement twice, yet here I am. If I bring up that topic again, don't believe a word.

 

Offline Havock

  • 27
Quote
Originally posted by Woolie Wool


Do you know what's even funnier? You just called the ML-16 a destructive weapon! The ****************ing ML-16 LASER!:lol:


it is.
as long as there are no shields covering the targe't, it does some "fair" damage.

the morningstar is handy, yeah.

 

Offline Drew

  • 29
    • http://www.galactic-quest.com
not just handy! its the most powerful primaries on PXO!
 (with a good pilot using it) it can stop an opponet dead or shoot them backwards. Meanwile he pumps Tornados and tempests into you while you are totaly helpless.........
it also has a fast fireing rate
[(WWF - steroids + ties - spandex) / Atomic Piledrivers] - viewing audience = C-SPAN

My god.. He emptied the gasoline tank from the van onto your cat, lit him on fire, threw him in the house and dove for cover.  :wtf: Family indeed.  ~ KT

Happiness is belt fed.

 

Offline Havock

  • 27
Quote
Originally posted by Drew
not just handy! its the most powerful primaries on PXO!
 (with a good pilot using it) it can stop an opponet dead or shoot them backwards. Meanwile he pumps Tornados and tempests into you while you are totaly helpless.........
it also has a fast fireing rate


as well as being a complete pain in the ass for the receiving end.

and you can club em againt obstacles.
give a sathanas some new paintwork :devil:

  

Offline TopAce

  • Stalwart contributor
  • 212
  • FREDder, FSWiki editor, and tester
No doubt the MS has a good tactical usage, but it's damage is still low and this makes it non-ideal for using in the single player part against the Ai.
My community contributions - Get my campaigns from here.

I already announced my retirement twice, yet here I am. If I bring up that topic again, don't believe a word.

 

Offline Flaser

  • 210
  • man/fish warsie
It is the best bomber interceptor weapon for anything that can't carry the maxim.

It is the BEST fighter interceptor weapon.
"I was going to become a speed dealer. If one stupid fairytale turns out to be total nonsense, what does the young man do? If you answered, “Wake up and face reality,” you don’t remember what it was like being a young man. You just go to the next entry in the catalogue of lies you can use to destroy your life." - John Dolan

 

Offline TopAce

  • Stalwart contributor
  • 212
  • FREDder, FSWiki editor, and tester
I would rather destroy a bomber/fighter with double kaysers or Proms rather than using the MS to pull them back. Honestly said, it is really a good one, but sometimes it brings disadvantages. For example you pull the enemy fighter out of the firing range and that quickly that you cannot hit it.
My community contributions - Get my campaigns from here.

I already announced my retirement twice, yet here I am. If I bring up that topic again, don't believe a word.

 

Offline Galemp

  • Actual father of Samus
  • 212
  • Ask me about GORT!
    • Steam
    • User page on the FreeSpace Wiki
Quote
Originally posted by TopAce
For example you pull the enemy fighter out of the firing range and that quickly that you cannot hit it.


Unless you've got a pair of Trebuchets with their name on it. ;7
"Anyone can do any amount of work, provided it isn't the work he's supposed to be doing at that moment." -- Robert Benchley

Members I've personally met: RedStreblo, Goober5000, Sandwich, Splinter, Su-tehp, Hippo, CP5670, Terran Emperor, Karajorma, Dekker, McCall, Admiral Wolf, mxlm, RedSniper, Stealth, Black Wolf...

 

Offline TopAce

  • Stalwart contributor
  • 212
  • FREDder, FSWiki editor, and tester
Quote
Originally posted by GalacticEmperor


Unless you've got a pair of Trebuchets with their name on it. ;7


I meant laser cannons. The maxim would be ideal, the MS can bring down the shields, and the maxim the hull, but then your generator would be depleted.
My community contributions - Get my campaigns from here.

I already announced my retirement twice, yet here I am. If I bring up that topic again, don't believe a word.