I will now deal with the arguments against me:
This has to be the SINGLE, MOST STUPID argument I have ever heard. CD quality, in any case is better than MP3 quality. Mp3 quality reaches CD quality at 300 kbps and up
Do some research. 128 is CD quality, now 300.
Stealth: Having 1000 mp3's is not an indication of knowledge as far as I can tell
Not necessarily. Not everyone reads the EULA to every piece of software. I don't. I just click the checkbox and install the damned thing.well you're legally supposed to read the user agreement, so saying "well most people don't" doesn't really help your argument
Read the user contract? Ever seen how friggin big those things are? And how much gibberish and technical terms it has? No way on earth can a little 12 year old understand it
I don'to understand how you can all argue this.
Has anyone heard of Napster? I know i have, and i know everyone i've spoken to has heard of it... the lawsuits filed against Napster hit headlines multiple times... there's no way a 12 year old honor student doesn't know about that... because EVERYONE knows about that... my neighbor's 10 year old daughter has heard about Napster...
Napster was closed down because it was geared to sharing ILLEGAL MP3s... Kazaa, WinMX, Morpheus, etc. are all clones. It's not like she had 1000 MP3s on her computer from CD Rips, it says she USED KAZAA... how can you be so idiotic so as to say "oh but poor 12 year old honor student in school... she was so poor she probably never knew she was doing anything illegal". that's bull****. the kid deserves to get punished AS MUCH AS ANYONE ELSE DOES!!! being 12 years old doesn't exempt you from anything.
Now even if she did
not know... that's no excuse... as i've said before, you get punished for knowing what you did wrong or not. saying "i didn't know i was doing something wrong" doesn't work...
If the girl has not heard of Napster or any of the anti-MP3-sharing lawsuits, then she deserves a fine.