[Bobboau]

weren't you saying something about the enemy of my enemy is my frend just the other day?
think it was about the Ba'athists and shei allying against us.

hell, we've been over this, you know what I thin I know what you think, I don't care anymore.

[Rictor]

touche

[Gank]

Originally posted by Bobboau
they were in the north and attacked the kurds, enemies of Sadam.

they didnt just attack the Kurds, most of their operations were against Saddam

Originally posted by Bobboau
I think that validates the suport of terrorism charges, you don't.

I do think that qualifies as supporting terrorism, I dont think that justifies invading the place. And judging by the amount of terroist attacks against Iraqis over the last year the US has only made the place worse as far as thats concerned.

Originally posted by Bobboau
and UN inspectors were kicked out in 98 still thinking he had them, they weren't let back in untill a year and a half ago

So because people thought he had them 6 years ago its ok to assume he still had them at the time of the invasion, despite the same people saying he hadnt? riiiiight.

[aldo_14]

Originally posted by Bobboau
well everyone else seemed to think he had them, at least they did two years earlier, and there was no reason to think that he had gotten rid of them, if Bush knew that Sadam had no WMDs he would have used something else to justify the war (like terrorism, wich was legitimate)

From what i can tell, the entire justification for the war was that Saddam had WMD which he could supply terrorists with.  That was what the suppossed imminent threat was - certainly that's what the governemnet over here tried to sell it on.

[vyper]

Turkish warplanes attacked the Kurds villages actually. We (US/UK) pulled our no fly zone off line several times to allow it. Ironic no?