Author Topic: Activision suing Viacom over Star Trek  (Read 5945 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Kosh

  • A year behind what's funny
  • 210
Activision suing Viacom over Star Trek
I personally liked the concept of Andromeda. I also thought the ship designs and special effects were pretty cool (even though they tend to re-use battle sequences WAY, WAY too much and it's totally obvious). I thought the costuming was AWFUL.


But none of that matters, as Babylon 5 rules all
"The reason for this is that the original Fortran got so convoluted and extensive (10's of millions of lines of code) that no-one can actually figure out how it works, there's a massive project going on to decode the original Fortran and write a more modern system, but until then, the UK communication network is actually relying heavily on 35 year old Fortran that nobody understands." - Flipside

Brain I/O error
Replace and press any key

 

Offline Ford Prefect

  • 8D
  • 26
  • Intelligent Dasein
Activision suing Viacom over Star Trek
Quote
Originally posted by Liberator
What costumes?  They all look like they came out of a music video.  Contrary to what we've been lead to believe, the High Guard must be very low key when it comes to proper dress.  I realize it's kind of a naval setting and it's not like I'm asking for full dress every week, but is it too much to ask for the crew to wear standard uniforms?  I mean really, they're the command staff for a crew of 4000, they should set an example.  I understand that non-standard clothing might be required for covert stuff but really, there's not a whole lot of covertness about a Glorius Heritage cruiser.

BTW, kinda OT but does anyone have the dimensions of the Andromeda?  I've seen 9?? x 4?? x 4?? in places but I remember a plot character commenting how she was the size of twelve or her worlds aircraft carriers.  I may not be terribly gifted at the maths, but I know that an aircraft carriers are commonly in the 600 to 800 meter range so how can the Andromeda be the stated size and elicit that kind of comment?

I find the lack of standardized uniforms appealing because I detest the rigid military mentality, and the less that it resembles that, the better.

Dimensions for the Glorious Heritage XMC:
Length: 1301m
Beam: 976m
Height: 325m
Inertial Mass: 96,408,876kg
"Mais est-ce qu'il ne vient jamais à l'idée de ces gens-là que je peux être 'artificiel' par nature?"  --Maurice Ravel

 

Offline Ghostavo

  • 210
  • Let it be glue!
    • Skype
    • Steam
    • Twitter
Activision suing Viacom over Star Trek
Er... "rigid military mentality" is necessary in any kind of armed forces :wtf:

Oh and *cough* http://www.allsystems.org/engineering/dsa2.shtml *cough* :nervous:
"Closing the Box" - a campaign in the making :nervous:

Shrike is a dirty dirty admin, he's the destroyer of souls... oh god, let it be glue...

 

Offline Ford Prefect

  • 8D
  • 26
  • Intelligent Dasein
Activision suing Viacom over Star Trek
Quote
Er... "rigid military mentality" is necessary in any kind of armed forces

Well that's an argument I won't get into.

And yes, I read the little blurb about it; this site is my source. I don't care what the description says, look at its armament and then look at the heavy cruiser's.
"Mais est-ce qu'il ne vient jamais à l'idée de ces gens-là que je peux être 'artificiel' par nature?"  --Maurice Ravel

 

Offline Ghostavo

  • 210
  • Let it be glue!
    • Skype
    • Steam
    • Twitter
Activision suing Viacom over Star Trek
Example:

Andromeda's:

Combat Systems:
40 ELS missile tubes
12 PDL 50Mw turrets
12 AP cannons
6 Radiating Counter Measure generators

Fighter and drone support:
76 RA-26 Shrike strike fighters
12 AF/A-29 Phoenix atmospheric attack craft
16 ES-115 Oracle heavy sensor/attack drones
8 ES-14 Janus light sensor/attack drones

Wrath of Achilles':

Combat Systems:
180 ELS missile tubes :eek2:
24 PDL 35Mw turrets
4 AP cannons
6 Radiating Counter Measure generators

Fighter and drone support:
32 ES-14 Janus light sensor/attack drones

So you can see in terms of raw firepower, the Wrath of Achilles is much more powerful, as the only advantage the Andromeda has is it's fighter support which it's effectiveness against such a ship is unknown seeing that IIRC it was never used against it.
« Last Edit: August 29, 2004, 09:49:41 am by 1606 »
"Closing the Box" - a campaign in the making :nervous:

Shrike is a dirty dirty admin, he's the destroyer of souls... oh god, let it be glue...

 

Offline Ford Prefect

  • 8D
  • 26
  • Intelligent Dasein
Activision suing Viacom over Star Trek
I'm willing to bet that fighter support makes a huge difference against a ship like the Wrath of Achilles, whose arsenal is configured for engaging large vessels at longer range. (Of course they didn't show that in the show because it would have worked against the desired plot course.) And although its armor, shielding and single entry point may decrease the likelihood of this, heaven help that thing if it ever is boarded, because it has no Lancer compliment.

And if this feeble attempt at an argument fails to convince you, I will say this: The DSA II is funny-looking.
"Mais est-ce qu'il ne vient jamais à l'idée de ces gens-là que je peux être 'artificiel' par nature?"  --Maurice Ravel

 

Offline Ghostavo

  • 210
  • Let it be glue!
    • Skype
    • Steam
    • Twitter
Activision suing Viacom over Star Trek
It has a Lancer contingent. And the DSA II has double of the turrets of the Andromeda, and given it's lower profile it's probably less vunerable to such threats. But since it was never shown... I guess we'll never know.

And I love the looks of the DSA II :D
"Closing the Box" - a campaign in the making :nervous:

Shrike is a dirty dirty admin, he's the destroyer of souls... oh god, let it be glue...

 

Offline Ford Prefect

  • 8D
  • 26
  • Intelligent Dasein
Activision suing Viacom over Star Trek
Quote
...the new DSA forgoes such standard shipboard features as small craft, a Lancer contingent, and research capabilities in favor of missiles, missiles, and more missiles.
"Mais est-ce qu'il ne vient jamais à l'idée de ces gens-là que je peux être 'artificiel' par nature?"  --Maurice Ravel

 

Offline Ghostavo

  • 210
  • Let it be glue!
    • Skype
    • Steam
    • Twitter
Activision suing Viacom over Star Trek
oh... sorry... misread it :p
"Closing the Box" - a campaign in the making :nervous:

Shrike is a dirty dirty admin, he's the destroyer of souls... oh god, let it be glue...

 

Offline Sandwich

  • Got Screen?
  • 213
    • Skype
    • Steam
    • Twitter
    • Brainzipper
Activision suing Viacom over Star Trek
Quote
Originally posted by Tiara

I think in the St-verse, it's very possible. Hell, the warp nacelles on most ships are tied in with bent tooth pick to the main hull (like the Galaxy). :p

IMO, the external nacelles are an old fashioned design. In the past they needed to be outside the ship to create a stable warp field. But instead of working it away (what should be done in a military fleet. See Defiant design) they decided on keeping them external because it gives a slight edge in speed (The Defiant is limited to Warp 9.2 IIRC and the Galaxy can go Warp 9.6+).

Also, power conduits seem to be very small in such ships. Like in the Intrepid class, one of the main powerconduits was an about 4 inches thick tube. It had 5,000 Terawatts flowing through it.


I don't know what's nerdier - you being able to spout off such data, or me for reading this thread.

*glances up at 2 towering bookshelves filled to the brim with 350+ ST books*

:nervous:
SERIOUSLY...! | {The Sandvich Bar} - Rhino-FS2 Tutorial | CapShip Turret Upgrade | The Complete FS2 Ship List | System Background Package

"...The quintessential quality of our age is that of dreams coming true. Just think of it. For centuries we have dreamt of flying; recently we made that come true: we have always hankered for speed; now we have speeds greater than we can stand: we wanted to speak to far parts of the Earth; we can: we wanted to explore the sea bottom; we have: and so  on, and so on: and, too, we wanted the power to smash our enemies utterly; we have it. If we had truly wanted peace, we should have had that as well. But true peace has never been one of the genuine dreams - we have got little further than preaching against war in order to appease our consciences. The truly wishful dreams, the many-minded dreams are now irresistible - they become facts." - 'The Outward Urge' by John Wyndham

"The very essence of tolerance rests on the fact that we have to be intolerant of intolerance. Stretching right back to Kant, through the Frankfurt School and up to today, liberalism means that we can do anything we like as long as we don't hurt others. This means that if we are tolerant of others' intolerance - especially when that intolerance is a call for genocide - then all we are doing is allowing that intolerance to flourish, and allowing the violence that will spring from that intolerance to continue unabated." - Bren Carlill

 

Offline Grey Wolf

Activision suing Viacom over Star Trek
That's one thing Trek ships are really lacking in: redundancy. They have all the random things that serve no real purpose (holodecks, for example) but they lack things warships really need. For example, the warp core. Given their notorious habit of breaking, you'd think they'd have a backup core or two built into the design of the ships.
You see things; and you say "Why?" But I dream things that never were; and I say "Why not?" -George Bernard Shaw

 

Offline Bri_Dog

  • 28
Activision suing Viacom over Star Trek
I think the Sov has a backup core......I'm probably thinking of something else though.
Sig

 

Offline Tiara

  • Mrs. T, foo'!
  • 210
Activision suing Viacom over Star Trek
Eh, they were never designed as pure warships. They were build for science and exploration but with big and sharp enough teeth to fend off any potential hostiles. Most of the recreational areas were built in because of the fact that these kind of ships (like the E-D) were designed for long term missions. This is something only a few people seem to understand.

The only dedicated warship in the fleet is the Defiant. It had a more advanced warp core to power it's new advanced array of weaponry, it had heavy ablative armor, didn't have recreational areas, no luxurious quarters but mere bunks, etc etc. A single Defiant is a match for entire squadrons of Jem'Hadar Bug ships or even much larger battleships (like the Negh'Var, the largest Klingon battleship).

It's a fun thing though that even though the Federation fleet is based on exploration ships that they still are powerfull enough to scare off any other major power. It's probably also the reason why the Federation kicked so much Dominion ass in the final stages of the war. They had completed most of the War refits on their ships.

For example; The Galaxy class vessel was a pure exploration ship. But after the War refit, the Galaxy (widely known as the War Galaxy) became notorious for it's power in battle. In DS9: 'Sacrifice of Angels' you see entire Galaxy wings maul entire sections of the Cardassian/Dominion blockade even though they were outnumbered 3:1.
I AM GOD! AND I SHALL SMITE THEE!



...because I can :drevil:

 

Offline Kosh

  • A year behind what's funny
  • 210
Activision suing Viacom over Star Trek
Tiara is appearently quite a Trekkie. :)
"The reason for this is that the original Fortran got so convoluted and extensive (10's of millions of lines of code) that no-one can actually figure out how it works, there's a massive project going on to decode the original Fortran and write a more modern system, but until then, the UK communication network is actually relying heavily on 35 year old Fortran that nobody understands." - Flipside

Brain I/O error
Replace and press any key

 

Offline Tiara

  • Mrs. T, foo'!
  • 210
Activision suing Viacom over Star Trek
Well, duh! Where have you been the last few years? :p
I AM GOD! AND I SHALL SMITE THEE!



...because I can :drevil:

 

Offline Zeronet

  • Hanger Man
  • 29
Activision suing Viacom over Star Trek
DS9 had big battles with lots of flashy booms an stuff, wheeee!
Got Ether?

 

Offline Flipside

  • əp!sd!l£
  • 212
Activision suing Viacom over Star Trek
:lol:

Well, that's me sold, I'm off to watch some DS9 :D

 

Offline Knight Templar

  • Stealth
  • 212
  • I'm a magic man, I've got magic hands.
Activision suing Viacom over Star Trek
Is anything else required really?
Copyright ©1976, 2003, KT Enterprises. All rights reserved

"I don't want to get laid right now. I want to get drunk."- Mars

Too Long, Didn't Read

 

Offline Tiara

  • Mrs. T, foo'!
  • 210
Activision suing Viacom over Star Trek
Re... quired? :wtf:

:p
I AM GOD! AND I SHALL SMITE THEE!



...because I can :drevil:

 

Offline Knight Templar

  • Stealth
  • 212
  • I'm a magic man, I've got magic hands.
Activision suing Viacom over Star Trek
.................................
Copyright ©1976, 2003, KT Enterprises. All rights reserved

"I don't want to get laid right now. I want to get drunk."- Mars

Too Long, Didn't Read