[an0n]

Originally posted by aldo_14
Apparently, being homophobic is a common way of hiding repressed homosexuality.

That's just liberal mind-trickery and it's one step down from "I know you are, but what am I?".

And 'homophobic' is the wrong term. I, for one, do not fear homosexuals - I revile and despise them.

[Gank]

Even lesbians?

[aldo_14]

Originally posted by an0n
That's just liberal mind-trickery and it's one step down from "I know you are, but what am I?".

And 'homophobic' is the wrong term. I, for one, do not fear homosexuals - I revile and despise them.

Yeah, but you're a bitter & twisted degenerate anyways, so you hate everyone.

[Shrike]

Originally posted by Styxx
Shame no one's willing to put money into finding the gene responsible for religious predisposition...

Hey, with proper drugs you can replicate a 'religious experience'.

Originally posted by aldo_14
So you're saying God is playing a game with existence, allowing random genetic mutations to create 'bad' people, and then judging them upon something they have no control over?

So it'd be just as valid to send people with Downs' Syndrome to hell, because they have as much of a choice in the matter? (I'm not sure where animal homosexuality - as has been documented - would figure in the whole unnatural part of this....)

Funny, I never saw God as sadistic.

And equally importantly, why would a god that do something like that be deserving of veneration?

Personally, I support gays.  It means less guys chasing after women.  Now lesbians on the other hand...

[Andreas]

Originally posted by vyper

I just like my asshole the size it is.

Did you really think I was interested in you?

Now, now,  but to be serious, that lawsuit is, to say the least, ridiculous.

[Bobboau]

Originally posted by TrashMan



How very unoriginal...Really Bob,  Iexpected bettrer from you.

Anyway, you start from the wrong premise. Faith is purely a personal choice and has nothing to do with hormons or genes, thus there ca nbe no comparison.

..you do realise I said the exact same thing you did, used the same logical expailation only applyed it to you.

you base all your beliefes on emotion, there may be logic built up upon it but the foundation is pure emotion.

now I want to ask you something, you said that homosexuality could be caused by a mutated gene, if you beleive this to be potentaly true why do you want to compell them to act in a manner that is against there nature and thus perpetuateing the faulty gene?

[Flipside]

More importantly, you do realise that if it wasn't for genes mutating we'd all be blobs talking blobby language and typing on blobby computers because we'd have never got our slimy single-celled butts out of the ocean?

If homosexuality were because of a 'bad' or 'wrong' mutation, then they would have vanished. The fact that Homosexuality appears in generation after generation suggests that not only is it normal, but it may well, in wome way, be required that part of humanity be gay.

[.::Tin Can::.]

God just wants to have fu-un!

[Beowulf]

Has anyone else noticed that this thread is extremely [SIZE=20]GAY[/SIZE]?



o~    o~    o~    c==='8

[Flipside]

Does that mean it's not allowed to merge with any other threads?

[.::Tin Can::.]

Not any manly threads.

[Ford Prefect]

I had sex with Jesus last night. He said that being gay is fine, so BEAT THAT.

[an0n]

I'm sure you did.

[Bobboau]

was he good?

[Bobboau]

Originally posted by Flipside
More importantly, you do realise that if it wasn't for genes mutating we'd all be blobs talking blobby language and typing on blobby computers because we'd have never got our slimy single-celled butts out of the ocean?

If homosexuality were because of a 'bad' or 'wrong' mutation, then they would have vanished. The fact that Homosexuality appears in generation after generation suggests that not only is it normal, but it may well, in wome way, be required that part of humanity be gay.

that wasn't the point I was trying to make.

[Flipside]

Nope, it was the point I was trying to make

[Taristin]

Originally posted by Flipside
Nope, it was the point I was trying to make

And a damned good point, seeing as how evolution tends to weed out the traits that are unnesessary.


Oh wait. The large majority of people who are against this are creationists, and they don't believe in evolution...

So. God made gays for a reason then... Unless you want to twist your beliefs some more to justify your hatred.

[Japong]

More importantly, you do realise that if it wasn't for genes mutating we'd all be blobs talking blobby language and typing on blobby computers because we'd have never got our slimy single-celled butts out of the ocean?

If homosexuality were because of a 'bad' or 'wrong' mutation, then they would have vanished. The fact that Homosexuality appears in generation after generation suggests that not only is it normal, but it may well, in wome way, be required that part of humanity be gay.

Not quite. Really, right now the human species as a whole isn't evolving genetically at all. The genetically weak [I have [/I]to be culled out before they can pass their genes on (i.e. have children)for evolution to work all, which hasn't happened to the human race via causes that discriminate on natural ability since we became Homo Sapiens Sapines, pretty much.  Human kind has no natural predators, and natural disasters /changes don't account for much of our population's deaths either. The closest we've come is human versus human conflict, which has closed or narrowed some major genetic lines (native american).  

However, despite the fact that we are not evolving does not mean that we are not mutating! Our genes are never quite passed on perfectly, we all vary from one another in some way or another, if only for the virtue that we are a mixture of our mother's and father's genes. On top of that just regular mutation (caused by raditation, genetic imperfections, whatever you'd like) will futher alter some people from others... it's just there's little consequence to it, as humans, even those with genetic flaws like people with Down's syndrome, are cared for by our species, and in some cases can even have children.  

That variance is enough to allow for gays to be a genetic abnormality of the human species. The trigger for it could very well be genetic, although it's far more likely that it's a combination of multiple factors, both sociological and biological.  Our species can at least tolerate that level of genetic deviation, although it in no way can require that some be gay. Evolution  is an undirected process, it always follows the path of least resistance, and most importantly, people who are fully gay won't pass on their genes, as it still requires both a man and a women to create a child, not a same-sex pair.

[TrashMan]

Originally posted by aldo_14


So you're saying God is playing a game with existence, allowing random genetic mutations to create 'bad' people, and then judging them upon something they have no control over?

So it'd be just as valid to send people with Downs' Syndrome to hell, because they have as much of a choice in the matter? (I'm not sure where animal homosexuality - as has been documented - would figure in the whole unnatural part of this....)

Funny, I never saw God as sadistic.

And if it's a choice, then why is it any more or less valid than the choice to believe in (a/many) God/s?

 If I say you're wrong & need 'reducation', simply because someone preached to me you were, should you accept it?  Because I have as much evidence as you have in claiming that homosexuality requires Clockwork Orange-esque 'treatment'.  Maybe you'd like to break out the nipple clamps on Hindus, Muslims, Buddhists or Sikhs while your at it?

I'm just interested to see where you're getting this from? You are waaay stretching the menaning of my words.

I never said gays were "bad" people, nor did I say they have to go to hell (well..maby if it is their own personal choice)

As far as animal homosexuality - that's plain crap. What's the evidence there? A picture of a squirrel on a squirrel? What does that tell you? For all you know the squirrel below coul very well be female. Or even if it were male, can you prove that there is actual "penetration"? If there's no penetration, there can be no talk about homosexualism....
And guess what - there is none...

So, yes, I belive being gay is a sickness, and like I said it most likely is.

I don't hate gays, actually I do belive most of them are nice people, but that's not the point.
-----

By Bob
you base all your beliefes on emotion, there may be logic built up upon it but the foundation is pure emotion.

I suppose your belefs are 100% objective, based purely on logic?
Gimme a break...

More importantly, you do realise that if it wasn't for genes mutating we'd all be blobs talking blobby language and typing on blobby computers because we'd have never got our slimy single-celled butts out of the ocean?

If homosexuality were because of a 'bad' or 'wrong' mutation, then they would have vanished. The fact that Homosexuality appears in generation after generation suggests that not only is it normal, but it may well, in wome way, be required that part of humanity be gay.

In nature, such individuals wouldn't survive ofr long, or have progeny, so tehy would in fact, practicly vanish.
Humanity protects all of it's members, even the sickest ones, and insures their survival. So that point is rather pointless.

Tell me something else, if you mutaded to have a third arm coming from your ass, would you try to remove it? Wouldn't you want to be normal?

[TrashMan]

Originally posted by Bobboau
now I want to ask you something, you said that homosexuality could be caused by a mutated gene, if you beleive this to be potentaly true why do you want to compell them to act in a manner that is against there nature and thus perpetuateing the faulty gene?

If it's a faulty gene, then in time, it could be cured with therapy.

In that case, the faulty gene wouldnt' be perpetuated, as seamen containst the copy of the LATEST genes (thus, the healthy ones..)...