Author Topic: FREEDOM OF SPEECH VS HATE  (Read 2668 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Janos

  • A *really* weird sheep
  • 28
Free speech and libel suits are not actually contradictionary.
lol wtf

 

Offline Martinus

  • Aka Maeglamor
  • 210
    • Hard Light Productions
Quote
Originally posted by icespeed
beating a child shouldn't be a regular thing, but it can be a good thing if necessary.

[color=66ff00]I find this a somewhat dangerous thought.

Consider: You're effectively saying to a child, a still forming psyche, that violence is a solution to a problem. The ones that don't make the connection between doing wrong and being hurt are recieving a fairly negative suggestion.

There are better ways, one I've seen is to simply pin the child to the floor face down until they agree to behave, the child associates a feeling of powerlessness with misbehaviour. Lots of genuine 'problem children' have shown a postive response to this method of punishment.
[/color]

 

Offline Flipside

  • əp!sd!l£
  • 212
Free Speech has always been a strange thing, mainly because it gets twisted to suit peoples needs. As I've said before, theres a line, it's a thin one admittedly, but heres an example :-

America is a phsycopathic country. (Iran is a Terrorist State)
All Americans are phsycopathic.. (All Arabs are Terrorists)

I'm not looking at this as a true statement, just a familiar statement for this context.

The first one is not, in my opinon, an offensive comment, but just as we all are made aware that not all Arabs are Terrorists, yet we associate their countries with funding Terror actions.

In many cases it is true, or at least heavily implied that the governments of said countries are assisting Terrorist acts, even if only by inaction.

The second statement is a generalisation, like assuming all Arabs are Terrorists, it's unfair, but the first statement is only someones opinion of the countries actions based on observation.

 

Offline Liberator

  • Poe's Law In Action
  • 210
Quote
Originally posted by Maeglamor

[color=66ff00]I find this a somewhat dangerous thought.

Consider: You're effectively saying to a child, a still forming psyche, that violence is a solution to a problem.No, you're using negative stimulus to instigate and reinforce a desired behavior set.  It's basic psychology.  If the child associates pain and embarrassment with a given type of behavior then they won't behave that way  The ones that don't make the connection between doing wrong and being hurt are recieving a fairly negative suggestion.

There are better ways, one I've seen is to simply pin the child to the floor face down until they agree to behave, the child associates a feeling of powerlessness with misbehaviour. Lots of genuine 'problem children' have shown a postive response to this method of punishment.Problem Children...I have a real problem with this, in my life I have met very few "problem children".  Only spirited and highly intelligent youngsters whose idiot parents and the quacks they take them to assume that they are damaged because they can't sit still when forced to slow down for everyone else.  A child who is full of enegy and/or asks lots of questions shouldn't be drugged or otherwise forced to conform, they should be guided and helped to find their full potential.
[/color]
So as through a glass, and darkly
The age long strife I see
Where I fought in many guises,
Many names, but always me.

There are only 10 types of people in the world , those that understand binary and those that don't.

 

Offline castor

  • 29
    • http://www.ffighters.co.uk./home/
But where to draw the line? What to "ban" to be on the safe side?
...I'd say "freedom of interpretation" lies at the core of the problem :)

 

Offline Flipside

  • əp!sd!l£
  • 212
I think using the word 'You' instead of 'Your Leadership' or 'Your country' lies very close to the heart of the problem.

I've seen it happen a few times on here, and it's an easy trap to fall into. The moment you say 'You' it suddenly becomes a personal accusation instead of a discussion, and the other side is immediately obliged to defend themselves. So, rather than saying..

'So then you decide to invade Iraq'

You say...

'So then, your government decides to invade Iraq'

etc...

 

Offline Gank

  • 27
Too long.

And lol at the guy who complains about all the anti-american propaganda on this forum then starts a topic on freedom of speech. twat.

 

Offline Ford Prefect

  • 8D
  • 26
  • Intelligent Dasein
It is my fervent opinion that people should be permitted to say whatever they want, regardless of how obscene it is, the only exceptions being direct threats and libel.
"Mais est-ce qu'il ne vient jamais à l'idée de ces gens-là que je peux être 'artificiel' par nature?"  --Maurice Ravel

 

Offline Grey Wolf

I feel you should be able to say whatever you want, as long as it's not a direct threat or libel, and as long as you're not being payed to annoy people over the phone.
You see things; and you say "Why?" But I dream things that never were; and I say "Why not?" -George Bernard Shaw

 

Offline Janos

  • A *really* weird sheep
  • 28
Quote
Originally posted by Flipside
Free Speech has always been a strange thing, mainly because it gets twisted to suit peoples needs. As I've said before, theres a line, it's a thin one admittedly, but heres an example :-

America is a phsycopathic country. (Iran is a Terrorist State)
All Americans are phsycopathic.. (All Arabs are Terrorists)



Iranians are not Arabs. The more you know!
lol wtf

 

Offline Liberator

  • Poe's Law In Action
  • 210
They's Semites(like the Israelis) right?
So as through a glass, and darkly
The age long strife I see
Where I fought in many guises,
Many names, but always me.

There are only 10 types of people in the world , those that understand binary and those that don't.

 

Offline Gank

  • 27
Nope,  Aryans hence the name Iran. And not all Israelis are Semites, only 20% or so. (plus the 15% of the population thats Arab)
« Last Edit: January 27, 2005, 04:17:31 pm by 723 »

 

Offline Grey Wolf

I thought that the Iranians were Persian for some reason.
You see things; and you say "Why?" But I dream things that never were; and I say "Why not?" -George Bernard Shaw

 

Offline Liberator

  • Poe's Law In Action
  • 210
Well, I meant the natural born Hebrews, not the children of immigrants, but thanks for the info.
So as through a glass, and darkly
The age long strife I see
Where I fought in many guises,
Many names, but always me.

There are only 10 types of people in the world , those that understand binary and those that don't.

 

Offline Gank

  • 27
Quote
Originally posted by Grey Wolf 2009
I thought that the Iranians were Persian for some reason.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aryan_race

 

Offline Grey Wolf

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persians

That one says 51-70% of Iranians are Persians.
You see things; and you say "Why?" But I dream things that never were; and I say "Why not?" -George Bernard Shaw

 

Offline WMCoolmon

  • Purveyor of space crack
  • 213
Quote
Originally posted by Grey Wolf 2009
I feel you should be able to say whatever you want, as long as it's not a direct threat or libel, and as long as you're not being payed to annoy people over the phone.


Pretty much what I think.

As for the whole side discussion about children, I have found parenting to be pretty disgusting in general. It's sort of an ultimate form of the strong oppressing the weak; the parents attempt to dictate and mold to their children whatever their ideals are, or just plain whoever they want to see their child be, without any real regard for how that'll affect them in life. Like the guy selling his kids' Christmas presents on ebay, or the deaf lesbian couple specifically trying to have a deaf child.

And of course, the people who seem like they should allow their kids more freedom are always the ones who work the hardest to make them think a certain way.
-C

 

Offline Gank

  • 27
The Iranians are Persian like the Germans are Saxon.
The Iranians are Aryan like the Germans are European.

you see the difference?

 

Offline Carl

  • Render artist
  • 211
    • http://www.3dap.com/hlp/
You should be allowed to say anything you want. that way the world knows you're a tard.

Like if someone wants to kill all the gays. though that is morally wrong to do, you should let him say it all he wants. then everyone will know he's a smacktard, and the police can keep an eye on him incase he tries anything.
"Gunnery control, fry that ****er!" - nuclear1

 

Offline ShadowWolf_IH

  • A Real POF Guy
  • 211
    • CoW
Quote
Originally posted by Gank
Too long.

And lol at the guy who complains about all the anti-american propaganda on this forum then starts a topic on freedom of speech. twat.


there was actually a very good reason for this thread, one that i'm sure you are not aware of.  maybe in time you will be made aware of the outcome.  So don't assume, because at least in this case, you don't know what is going on behind closed doors.

and for the record.....
name calling...how quaint.:rolleyes:
You can't take the sky from me.  Can't take that from me.

Casualties of War