[Shrike]

I was pleasantly surprised with it.  The people seemed much more real than any others I've seen, perhaps because they seem much closer to 'us' socially.  It's got promise.

But they did steal the guns off an ISD.  

[Fineus]

I'm curious to see how their going to do it, for the first time they're going back in time for the whole series, which means no fancy technology to get them out of scraps that wasn't seen in ST:TOS or later.

[jonskowitz]

No more PSB* plotline resolutions?  HOO-RAY!!!  That couldn't possibly be anything but a good thing...

[bangs head against keyboard]

But I still missed it...  shame I have to work.  But I guess eating is good.

*Pseudo Scientific Bullsh*t

[This message has been edited by jonskowitz (edited 09-26-2001).]

[Jabu]

There's still treknobabble, but I guess that's a necessity.

Possibly no particle-of-the-week, though. And there's no prime directive. Boo-yah!

[Setekh]

*shrugs* We'll see it in a few months. Gotta love the profound retardation of the Australian media circuit...

[Grey Wolf]

Enterprise is better than TOS/DS9/VOY, but TNG still rules! And it'll be finally shown near me again (TNG)!

[Grey Wolf]

 

Originally posted by Kazan:
i don't get UPN! is SciFi airing it?

Sorry, but no, and I doubt it ever will, at least not for a long time. After it's initial run it'll probably go on TNN first, do to the fact that's where all the ST shows other than TOS is going.

[CODEDOG ND]

I liked it, and Finally they have a HOTT VULCAN BABE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! DAMN NETWORK TELEVISION!!!!

[Warlock]

I liked it more than most of the rest of Star Trek shows so far. Although two points that hit me. One...I was rather amused to see that the ship was one I found a render site online 8 months ago showing 6 various renders ...one being the EXACT image at the begining when they first left Earth.  lol

The other...call me picky...but TOS was the first Enterprise, prior to the "A" and rest of the line,...since after that ...the movie was the "A" Class...the "B" "C" "D" and now "E",...what the hell is this one? Or would it be concidered different since it's still an experimental design (The NX classifaction)?  

But over all...even thou the pulled the "Lets copy star wars and make a prequel" I loved the show...hell once it was over my only thought was "Ya mean I gotta wait another week!!!!???"


And the Vulcan...much more than a babe! Loved that Decon Scene    

------------------
Warlock
           
DeathAngel Squadron
CO

Do or Do Not,..There Is No Spoon
DeathAngel Squadron and Ghosts of the Past Forum
Ghosts of the Past WebSite
To Fly Exotic Ships, Meet Exotic People, and Kill Them.


We may rise and fall, but in the end
 We meet our fate together

[Stryke 9]

That's just wrong.

[Shrike]

Yeah, they kinda screwed up continuity, but seeing as it isn't technically Star Trek: Enterprise, well.... semantics, semantics.    

[This message has been edited by Shrike (edited 09-27-2001).]

[Pegasus V]

 

Originally posted by Setekh:
*shrugs* We'll see it in a few months. Gotta love the profound retardation of the Australian media circuit...

I know!!   When will we see it in Australia!!

I'm going to have to order it on video or something...

[Griffon UK]

Are we talking TOS Klingons or TNG Klingons?

------------------
Temporal Mechanics

[This message has been edited by Griffon UK (edited 09-27-2001).]

[Ace]

I think it's considered different since it's an NX design.

I was pleased that the only technobabble there was actually relevant (i.e. genetic engineering, transporters, etc.) and it didn't try to "explain it."

The characters seem like they've finally rounded out what they were after in Voyager and DS:9, and it's so far very polished and good.

I just hope that it's not like Voyager, a great begining but quickly turns into regular 'Trek from techno-babble and mostly unrelated plotlines. (Enterprise I've heard has a full story arc, and if so it should work)

My question is if the "temporal cold war" is really 'temporal'... I think it might be a Romulan plot, who else would gain from hurting the Klingons and Vulcans and is that shadowy?  



------------------
Ace
Staff member FreeSpace Watch
 http://freespace.volitionwatch.com/

[Stryke 9]

As the latest in a horde of spinoffs from a mediocre original series (OK, the movies kicked serious *** , but seriously- if you're gonna create dozens of wierd alien races to add novelty to a stale show, couldn't you at least do more than make FOREHEAD RIDGES different?

...Traveling throughout the galaxy, discovering strange new skull shapes and mysterious space anomalies...

[Griffon UK]

 

Originally posted by Ace:
I just hope that it's not like Voyager, a great begining but quickly turns into regular 'Trek from techno-babble and mostly unrelated plotlines. (Enterprise I've heard has a full story arc, and if so it should work)

that was actually the opposite of Voyagers run...

it started out absolutely terrible, but actually started to come together once the characters managed to evolve...  and they stopped changing Janeways hair after every episode...

------------------
Temporal Mechanics

[Pegasus V]

 

Originally posted by Griffon UK:
it started out absolutely terrible, but actually started to come together once the characters managed to evolve...

I agree. I though Voyager's first season was really boring (and I'm a Trekker!).

 

Originally posted by Stryke 9:
As the latest in a horde of spinoffs from a mediocre original series (OK, the movies kicked serious *** , but seriously- if you're gonna create dozens of wierd alien races to add novelty to a stale show, couldn't you at least do more than make FOREHEAD RIDGES different?

In Enterprise, they plan to be giving all the Star Trek aliens makeovers. Remember those blue aliens with the antenae (Andorians)? Well, they're getting a new improved look (while still keeping the main characteristics). They say don't worry if it doesn't quite match TOS, because this was how Gene Roddenberry originally wanted it to look, but of course the budget and TOS Production's time period (60's) couldn't put this onscreen.

[jonskowitz]

 

Originally posted by Warlock:
The other...call me picky...but TOS was the first Enterprise, prior to the "A" and rest of the line,...since after that ...the movie was the "A" Class...the "B" "C" "D" and now "E",...what the hell is this one? Or would it be concidered different since it's still an experimental design (The NX classifaction)?  

All Enterprise ships after the TOS Enterprise were the A, B, ect. because they (for god knows what reason) coninued to use the same Naval Construction Contract number (1701 BTW) for the commisioning of all vessels to carry the name 'Enterprise'.   Otherwise the ships would all have had different contract numbers and would have been Enterprise II, III, IV, ad nausium...

[Grey Wolf]

I think it started because SF Command had a hidden camera in that shuttle in ST4 and wanted to see the look on Kirk's face...
just j/king.

[Warlock]

Well correct naming or not I love the ship! Makes me wish I the Star Trek RPG Unicorn Gaming made was still being published!

------------------
Warlock
           
DeathAngel Squadron
CO

Do or Do Not,..There Is No Spoon
DeathAngel Squadron and Ghosts of the Past Forum
Ghosts of the Past WebSite
To Fly Exotic Ships, Meet Exotic People, and Kill Them.


We may rise and fall, but in the end
 We meet our fate together