Author Topic: further proof that hollywood...  (Read 2036 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline aldo_14

  • Gunnery Control
  • 213
Re: further proof that hollywood...
movie that was bad in its original form ?

but... butbutbut - Ernest Borgnine!

 

Offline Col. Fishguts

  • voodoo doll
  • 211
Re: further proof that hollywood...
movie that was bad in its original form ?

but... butbutbut - Ernest Borgnine!

Even Ernest "Santini" Borgnine couldn't save this one.
"I don't think that people accept the fact that life doesn't make sense. I think it makes people terribly uncomfortable. It seems like religion and myth were invented against that, trying to make sense out of it." - D. Lynch

Visit The Babylon Project, now also with HTL flavour  ¦ GTB Rhea

 

Offline aldo_14

  • Gunnery Control
  • 213
Re: further proof that hollywood...
"Klangers on a mother-****in' moon!!"[/b] ;)


"Stay away from my pots, *****!"
« Last Edit: April 23, 2006, 05:53:39 pm by aldo_14 »

 

Offline Flipside

  • əp!sd!l£
  • 212
Re: further proof that hollywood...
:lol:

 

Offline Solatar

  • 211
Re: further proof that hollywood...
I just saw a preview today of a movie about 9/11. Not a conspiracy theory one or a documentary. Looked like an airplane thriller/emotional film...kinda made me sick. I mean, I know they do movies about other disasters like wars, ships sinking (titanic), and other stuff but I think 5 years after the fact is just not long enough to wait.
A common complaint i've been reading [and hearing], although nobody really seems to mind the fact that American Politicians bring it up at every turn. :rolleyes:

...I do. Not that I want to forget about it or anything, 'cause I'm sorry for the people and their families. The fact is...I'm sick of it being the "reason" for everything we do. It's turned into a propoganda thing.

Although I don't really mind that as MUCH as I mind a (seemingly) suspenseful thriller/blockbuster film based on the events. A documentary I can deal with...

  

Offline NGTM-1R

  • I reject your reality and substitute my own
  • 213
  • Syndral Active. 0410.
Re: further proof that hollywood...
To be totally honest, I haven't actually heard 9/11 brought up as justification in a long time. Implied, perhaps, but not explicitly said.

On the other hand perhaps I'm just not listening.
"Load sabot. Target Zaku, direct front!"

A Feddie Story

 

Offline Solatar

  • 211
Re: further proof that hollywood...
Well, I haven't followed the news as much lately, but I assumed (dumb, yes) that if Mefustae was seeing it as such a problem that politicians were spouting 9/11 at every turn, then there must have been a problem. I was merely agreeing with him in a twisted sort of way. :D

 

Offline Deepblue

  • Corporate Shill
  • 210
Re: further proof that hollywood...
Can someone explain to me why Flight 93 is too soon when the producers talked to every single family member involved on the plane and got unanimous approval before producing the movie.

I'd even go so far as to say it's not soon enough. People shouldn't forget things like 9/11.

 

Offline Ford Prefect

  • 8D
  • 26
  • Intelligent Dasein
Re: further proof that hollywood...
I don't think it's too soon. I think it's a stupid ****in' idea.

And how on Earth is anyone going to forget September 11? I would be really interested to hear someone's theories on this phenomenon.
"Mais est-ce qu'il ne vient jamais à l'idée de ces gens-là que je peux être 'artificiel' par nature?"  --Maurice Ravel

 

Offline Carl

  • Render artist
  • 211
    • http://www.3dap.com/hlp/
Re: further proof that hollywood...
Deepblue, I don't think that we would be forgetting any time soon, with or without a movie.
"Gunnery control, fry that ****er!" - nuclear1

 

Offline Flipside

  • əp!sd!l£
  • 212
Re: further proof that hollywood...
It's not the forgetting that is the problem, it's the forgiving, I wonder how far this movie will allow that to happen?

 

Offline Nuclear1

  • 211
Re: further proof that hollywood...
2006 remake


I was the trailer for that one a few weeks ago, and was thinking why anbody would want to see a remake of a movie that was bad in its original form ?

Well, one of the problems with the original one was that the cause was unbelievable (well, so is the ship turning completely upside down and remaining afloat, but still), being the result of
Spoiler:
a tidal wave kicked up by an undersea earthquake in the Meditte...Mediter...that one sea; of course, a tidal wave never reaches that high out at sea, but instead builds up in the shallow water at shore.

This version is supposed to make more use of the freak wave concept (which is actually more than plausible now; a few months before the shooting for the remake took place, something similar happened off of the coast of Georgia with a 70-foot freak wave; the wave in the movie is supposed to be about 100 feet).

Still, it looks like it would be interesting and reasonably good entertainment value, at least.
Spoon - I stand in awe by your flawless fredding. Truely, never before have I witnessed such magnificant display of beamz.
Axem -  I don't know what I'll do with my life now. Maybe I'll become a Nun, or take up Macrame. But where ever I go... I will remember you!
Axem - Sorry to post again when I said I was leaving for good, but something was nagging me. I don't want to say it in a way that shames the campaign but I think we can all agree it is actually.. incomplete. It is missing... Voice Acting.
Quanto - I for one would love to lend my beautiful singing voice into this wholesome project.
Nuclear1 - I want a duet.
AndrewofDoom - Make it a trio!

 

Offline aldo_14

  • Gunnery Control
  • 213
Re: further proof that hollywood...
I don't think it's too soon. I think it's a stupid ****in' idea.

And how on Earth is anyone going to forget September 11? I would be really interested to hear someone's theories on this phenomenon.

September 11?  When did that happen?

EDIT; something else http://www.muppetcentral.com/news/2005/092005.shtml
« Last Edit: April 24, 2006, 11:30:47 am by aldo_14 »