Author Topic: Imperial-I Star Destroyer  (Read 97011 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline brandx0

  • Moderator
  • 210
  • The Angriest Angel.
    • Fate of the Galaxy: The Star Wars Conversion for Freespace
Imperial-I Star Destroyer
Here we go, this is how the ISD Mk I is looking so far.  (As some of you know, I had to restart the model again)

Former Senior Modeler, Texturer and Content Moderator (retired), Fate of the Galaxy
"I love your wrong proportions--too long, no, wait, too short
I love you with a highly symbolic torpedo up the exhaust port"
-swashmebuckle's ode to the transport

 
Re: Imperial-I Star Destroyer
 :cool:
Sig nuked! New one coming soon!

 

Offline colecampbell666

  • I See Dead Pictures
  • 212
  • Evolution and ascension.
Re: Imperial-I Star Destroyer
As always, :yes:
Gettin' back to dodgin' lasers.

 
Re: Imperial-I Star Destroyer
Awesome! I think each time you restart this beast it looks better and goes faster! (That doesn't mean I want you to delay or restart again or anything :)

 

Offline Droid803

  • Trusted poster of legit stuff
  • 213
  • /人 ◕ ‿‿ ◕ 人\ Do you want to be a Magical Girl?
    • Skype
    • Steam
Re: Imperial-I Star Destroyer
Nice!
(´・ω・`)
=============================================================

 

Offline Snail

  • SC 5
  • 214
  • Posts: ☂
Re: Imperial-I Star Destroyer
Will the Tector be based off this model, or made from scratch? (either way, w00t)

 

Offline Stormkeeper

  • Interviewer Extraordinaire
  • 211
  • Boomz!
Re: Imperial-I Star Destroyer
Very nice. :yes:
Ancient-Shivan War|Interview Board

Member of the Scooby Doo Fanclub. And we're not talking a cartoon dog here people!!

 

Offline brandx0

  • Moderator
  • 210
  • The Angriest Angel.
    • Fate of the Galaxy: The Star Wars Conversion for Freespace
Re: Imperial-I Star Destroyer
Will the Tector be based off this model, or made from scratch? (either way, w00t)

It'll be based off the ISD II, with some added armour plating.
Former Senior Modeler, Texturer and Content Moderator (retired), Fate of the Galaxy
"I love your wrong proportions--too long, no, wait, too short
I love you with a highly symbolic torpedo up the exhaust port"
-swashmebuckle's ode to the transport

 

Offline brandx0

  • Moderator
  • 210
  • The Angriest Angel.
    • Fate of the Galaxy: The Star Wars Conversion for Freespace
Re: Imperial-I Star Destroyer
And another WIP, now with some detail added to the bottom.



And the back:

« Last Edit: June 23, 2008, 02:03:33 pm by brandx0 »
Former Senior Modeler, Texturer and Content Moderator (retired), Fate of the Galaxy
"I love your wrong proportions--too long, no, wait, too short
I love you with a highly symbolic torpedo up the exhaust port"
-swashmebuckle's ode to the transport

 

Offline colecampbell666

  • I See Dead Pictures
  • 212
  • Evolution and ascension.
Re: Imperial-I Star Destroyer
What's the polycount so far?
Gettin' back to dodgin' lasers.

 

Offline brandx0

  • Moderator
  • 210
  • The Angriest Angel.
    • Fate of the Galaxy: The Star Wars Conversion for Freespace
Re: Imperial-I Star Destroyer
Higher than it should be and not as high as it will be

In other words, the polycount is artificially high right now because I haven't optimized it, at all, it's still a rough base mesh.  It'll be higher when I add more detail, but most of it will be detail boxed.  For the mesh you see right now, which is pretty much everything that isn't detail boxed I'm expecting about 6-7k.  The rest will be in detail boxes.
Former Senior Modeler, Texturer and Content Moderator (retired), Fate of the Galaxy
"I love your wrong proportions--too long, no, wait, too short
I love you with a highly symbolic torpedo up the exhaust port"
-swashmebuckle's ode to the transport

  

Offline chief1983

  • Still lacks a custom title
  • Moderator
  • 212
  • ⬇️⬆️⬅️⬅️🅰➡️⬇️
    • Skype
    • Steam
    • Twitter
    • Fate of the Galaxy
Re: Imperial-I Star Destroyer
Those baffles seem a bit large, compared to these.  Or, is it just the perspective?  :)
Fate of the Galaxy - Now Hiring!  Apply within | Diaspora | SCP Home | Collada Importer for PCS2
Karajorma's 'How to report bugs' | Mantis
#freespace | #scp-swc | #diaspora | #SCP | #hard-light on EsperNet

"You may not sell or otherwise commercially exploit the source or things you created based on the source." -- Excerpt from FSO license, for reference

Nuclear1:  Jesus Christ zack you're a little too hamyurger for HLP right now...
iamzack:  i dont have hamynerge i just want ptatoc hips D:
redsniper:  Platonic hips?!
iamzack:  lays

 

Offline brandx0

  • Moderator
  • 210
  • The Angriest Angel.
    • Fate of the Galaxy: The Star Wars Conversion for Freespace
Re: Imperial-I Star Destroyer
Yeah, you're right.

Fixed.

Former Senior Modeler, Texturer and Content Moderator (retired), Fate of the Galaxy
"I love your wrong proportions--too long, no, wait, too short
I love you with a highly symbolic torpedo up the exhaust port"
-swashmebuckle's ode to the transport

 

Offline brandx0

  • Moderator
  • 210
  • The Angriest Angel.
    • Fate of the Galaxy: The Star Wars Conversion for Freespace
Re: Imperial-I Star Destroyer
As for my point about polies, I made up a render to illustrate a bit of what I'm talking about.  There's a lot of unneeded lines in there, each of which is contributing to the polycount.  As those lines get welded with existing vertices that ARE needed, the polycount will reduce.



And Triangulated to show where those extra vertices hurt:

« Last Edit: June 23, 2008, 04:07:56 pm by brandx0 »
Former Senior Modeler, Texturer and Content Moderator (retired), Fate of the Galaxy
"I love your wrong proportions--too long, no, wait, too short
I love you with a highly symbolic torpedo up the exhaust port"
-swashmebuckle's ode to the transport

 

Offline colecampbell666

  • I See Dead Pictures
  • 212
  • Evolution and ascension.
Re: Imperial-I Star Destroyer
I understand how it works. Thanks for the answer.
Gettin' back to dodgin' lasers.

 

Offline brandx0

  • Moderator
  • 210
  • The Angriest Angel.
    • Fate of the Galaxy: The Star Wars Conversion for Freespace
Re: Imperial-I Star Destroyer
Oh, and now she has teeth (yes, I'm aware that the 4th turret is supposed to be different, this is a placeholder until I do that one)

Former Senior Modeler, Texturer and Content Moderator (retired), Fate of the Galaxy
"I love your wrong proportions--too long, no, wait, too short
I love you with a highly symbolic torpedo up the exhaust port"
-swashmebuckle's ode to the transport

 
Re: Imperial-I Star Destroyer
question: why don't you just upgrade the models from IA?
Sig nuked! New one coming soon!

 

Offline brandx0

  • Moderator
  • 210
  • The Angriest Angel.
    • Fate of the Galaxy: The Star Wars Conversion for Freespace
Re: Imperial-I Star Destroyer
Because I like mine better.

Besides, my work is my work, not someone else's work that I touched up for them.  I'm an all or nothing kinda guy like that.

Also, this is why:












« Last Edit: July 08, 2008, 06:03:44 am by brandx0 »
Former Senior Modeler, Texturer and Content Moderator (retired), Fate of the Galaxy
"I love your wrong proportions--too long, no, wait, too short
I love you with a highly symbolic torpedo up the exhaust port"
-swashmebuckle's ode to the transport

 

Offline colecampbell666

  • I See Dead Pictures
  • 212
  • Evolution and ascension.
Re: Imperial-I Star Destroyer
That's a good reason.
Gettin' back to dodgin' lasers.

 

Offline Stormkeeper

  • Interviewer Extraordinaire
  • 211
  • Boomz!
Re: Imperial-I Star Destroyer
That long thing was the old Star Destroyer ?

I like brandx0's work netter. Much better.
Ancient-Shivan War|Interview Board

Member of the Scooby Doo Fanclub. And we're not talking a cartoon dog here people!!