Author Topic: Israel and Gaza  (Read 37400 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Nuclear1

  • 211
Yeah, you're right. Hamas cares so much about the Palestinians that they'll put 90% or whatever portion of their income into infrastructure, then start launching rockets into Israel and have it all blown away when Israel retaliates. I'm not saying Israel shouldn't be held responsible, but for the love of God, hasn't Hamas figured out by now that Israel won't be quiet about it when rockets are being heaved at it.

So, you've either got A) Hamas does care and is just stupid, or B) Hamas doesn't care and is doing exactly what it intends to do. I honestly just don't care which it is, because regardless, Hamas is simply furthering disunity in Palestine and detracting from the efforts of Palestinians who do wish to negotiate (ie. Fatah and Abbas).

I'm willing to bet, just maybe, if Hamas were to lay down arms, Israel wouldn't be blockading, invading, or bombing Gaza. I'm pretty sure those actions are only the result of Hamas launching the rockets in the first place.
Spoon - I stand in awe by your flawless fredding. Truely, never before have I witnessed such magnificant display of beamz.
Axem -  I don't know what I'll do with my life now. Maybe I'll become a Nun, or take up Macrame. But where ever I go... I will remember you!
Axem - Sorry to post again when I said I was leaving for good, but something was nagging me. I don't want to say it in a way that shames the campaign but I think we can all agree it is actually.. incomplete. It is missing... Voice Acting.
Quanto - I for one would love to lend my beautiful singing voice into this wholesome project.
Nuclear1 - I want a duet.
AndrewofDoom - Make it a trio!

 

Offline Mongoose

  • Rikki-Tikki-Tavi
  • Global Moderator
  • 212
  • This brain for rent.
    • Steam
    • Something
Any organization, no matter how much money they funnel toward charitable causes, which sponsors sustained attacks on civilian targets in a neighboring territory with full foreknowledge of the consequences of said attacks cannot be said to care about its populace in any real sense.  It's like sticking a fistful of ground beef repeatedly into a lion's mouth...you're losing that hand sooner or later, and you both know it.  I would never go so far as to call Israel's response in this particular situation, or in past ones, entirely proportional, but the cold hard truth remains that Hamas knew exactly what would happen when those rockets continued to be fired.  In fact, I'd bet anything that they were counting on it, since it allows them to easily portray themselves as the victims in the whole affair.  And all the while, it's their own citizens that suffer bombings and occupations and disease and starvation.  Hamas, care for anything except self-aggrandizing their own fanatical cause?  Don't make me gag.

Why should Hamas give a rat's ass about negotiating with Israel?  Because it's the only way that the citizens living in Gaza will ever get any sort of respite from the hell that is their lives.  Until that day comes, the rest of the world has every right to view them as the complete hypocrites they truly are.

(Gah, I got beat, but I'm not one to waste a simile.)

 

Offline karajorma

  • King Louie - Jungle VIP
  • Administrator
  • 214
    • Karajorma's Freespace FAQ
I think Flipside has his finger on the problem. Hamas doesn't actually control all of the people firing rockets in it's name. During the previous ceasefire the number of rockets fired was very heavily reduced but didn't completely stop. However Hamas can't stop the other extremists without gaining concessions from Israel, and none were forthcoming. Israel had a block on everything but humanitarian aid before the ceasefire and Israel had a block on everything but humanitarian aid during the ceasefire. It's rather hard to go after the radical elements in your own government when you have absolutely nothing to show them as the reason why they should stop.

However I do agree that revoking the ceasefire was stupid in the extreme. But we all know that Hamas is unable to realise that non-violent resistance would get them to their end much faster. Similarly Israel could have avoided the whole problem had they relaxed the blockade after Hamas stopped shooting the stuff it did control and told Hamas to deal with the ones it didn't.

So basically the situation we are left with is one where neither side is willing to take the steps that would actually result in peace due to the need to show strength to their population. Both act as if making any sort of concession would make them look weak and so neither is able to break the cycle of violence.

The real irony is that Israel should have learned it's lesson. The only reason Hamas are in charge in the first place is because Israel did the exact same thing to Fatah. They continually blamed them  for Hamas's rocket attacks and kept them from basically having any say in how Gaza was run. Small wonder that Hamas won the election. Now that Hamas are in charge they are left with two choices. Look as ineffectual as Fatah did or prompt an invasion every once in a while so that they can tell the people "Look who is really to blame!"

Which basically means that this ceasefire won't hold either. 
« Last Edit: January 25, 2009, 03:23:17 am by karajorma »
Karajorma's Freespace FAQ. It's almost like asking me yourself.

[ Diaspora ] - [ Seeds Of Rebellion ] - [ Mind Games ]

 

Offline TrashMan

  • T-tower Avenger. srsly.
  • 213
  • God-Emperor of your kind!
    • FLAMES OF WAR
It's not as simple as "Hamas builds schools, therefore, they care". It might be true if education was the single all-important issue facing the existence and safety of Gazans, but that is just undeniably false. If Hamas truly gave a damn about the Palestinian people, they'd lay down their weapons and come to the table with Fatah and the other not-so-bat****-crazy Palestinians to discuss coexistence with, and not the destruction of, Israel. Until then, as long as Gaza launches rockets into Israeli towns, the Palestinian civilians in Gaza will be paying the consequences through Israeli retribution.

You could say the same thing about Israel then. If they care about their own civilians they will lay down their arms and give back the territories.

Doesn't work that way, sorry. What you're using is Guilt Transfer - A is guilty for B's actions because A "made" B do it. I don't believe in that crap. Everyone is responsible for his own action and his action ONLY.
Nobody dies as a virgin - the life ****s us all!

You're a wrongularity from which no right can escape!

 

Offline Androgeos Exeunt

  • Captain Oblivious
  • 212
  • Prevents attraction.
    • Wordpress.com Blog
You say that, TrashMan, but that really is what's happening out there. If they weren't using guilt transfer or tit-for-tat, there would never have been any rocket attacks in either country.
My blog

Quote: Tuesday, 3 October 2023 0133 UTC +8, #general
MP-Ryan
Oh you still believe in fairy tales like Santa, the Easter Bunny, and free market competition principles?

 

Offline Janos

  • A *really* weird sheep
  • 28
Yeah, you're right. Hamas cares so much about the Palestinians that they'll put 90% or whatever portion of their income into infrastructure, then start launching rockets into Israel and have it all blown away when Israel retaliates. I'm not saying Israel shouldn't be held responsible, but for the love of God, hasn't Hamas figured out by now that Israel won't be quiet about it when rockets are being heaved at it.

What should they do, sit there and starve?
I don't like Hamas. I don't think they have a monopoly on force in Gaza. But seriously, what is there to do? There is nothing to do in Gaza. Hamas is dependent on anti-Israel feelings.

Quote
So, you've either got A) Hamas does care and is just stupid, or B) Hamas doesn't care and is doing exactly what it intends to do. I honestly just don't care which it is, because regardless, Hamas is simply furthering disunity in Palestine and detracting from the efforts of Palestinians who do wish to negotiate (ie. Fatah and Abbas).

Hamas does not like Fatah. Hamas was funded and founded to dig the earth from under the feet of PLO, they have had a short civil war with Fatah (which Hamas won), they essentially view Fatah as collaborators with the enemy regime.

"They should just let it be and negotiate" is a stupid thing to say when the immensely more powerful opponent refuses to negotiate at all.

Quote
I'm willing to bet, just maybe, if Hamas were to lay down arms, Israel wouldn't be blockading, invading, or bombing Gaza. I'm pretty sure those actions are only the result of Hamas launching the rockets in the first place.

Look at this you goddamnit
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/93/Israelis_killed_by_Palestinians_in_Israel_and_Palestinians_killed_by_Israelis_in_Gaza_-_2008.png

look at it

you could also read this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blockade_of_the_Gaza_Strip#Attempt_at_easing_restrictions

"Oh they just have to sit there and take in the ass, maybe one day we will do something about it."

And you swallow that idiocy hook, line and sinker.

« Last Edit: January 27, 2009, 01:28:46 pm by Janos »
lol wtf

 

Offline IPAndrews

  • Disgruntled Customer
  • 212
  • This site stole my work
hasn't Hamas figured out by now that Israel won't be quiet about it when rockets are being heaved at it.

On the other hand if they don't take steps to destroy the Zionist entity they aren't fulfilling their manifesto pledge. It's a pickle and no mistake.
Be warned: This site's admins stole 100s of hours of my work. They will do it to you.

 

Offline TrashMan

  • T-tower Avenger. srsly.
  • 213
  • God-Emperor of your kind!
    • FLAMES OF WAR
Janos, your link doesn't work...typos man...typos
Nobody dies as a virgin - the life ****s us all!

You're a wrongularity from which no right can escape!

 

Offline karajorma

  • King Louie - Jungle VIP
  • Administrator
  • 214
    • Karajorma's Freespace FAQ
Quote
After the 2008–2009 Israel–Gaza conflict‎, Israel has said it will allow in some humanitarian aide, but will continue its economic blockage as Israel claims that this action will weaken the power of Hamas.

Which basically means that this ceasefire won't hold either.

See?

Israel claim that they are willing to negotiate with Fatah now. That's a ****ing lie. When Fatah were in power they didn't want to negotate with them either. And they used the same excuses they used for not negotiating with Hamas now. If Fatah did come to power again we'd hear the same bull**** a second time.

As I keep saying both sides are uninterested in peace. They'll say they want it to their people but neither side considers peace even remotely as important as staying in power. In order to have peace in Gaze you need leaders who are willing to be unpopular. You need someone who is so willing to have peace that they don't care if their actions get them regarded as traitors by the same kind of right wing nut cases who shot Rabin or who comprise most of Hamas. Unfortunately those sort of people aren't in power in either country and thus you won't have peace.
Karajorma's Freespace FAQ. It's almost like asking me yourself.

[ Diaspora ] - [ Seeds Of Rebellion ] - [ Mind Games ]

 

Offline Mika

  • 28
Personally, I still don't get it what's so difficult in keeping those rockets at bay for, say, two years to allow things to change.

Luckily there is talk about a special delegation being sent to solve the conflict. But I doubt even Ahtisaari could solve that mess.

In the end, it all goes back to question, does Isreal have a right to exist?

Mika
Relaxed movement is always more effective than forced movement.

 
Sorry I have been out of this for a bit lots of work and real life goings on. I am not responding to specific posts here I am just throwing a few things on the flames.

International law states that occupying land is not illegal in itself, during war it's allowed to temporarily occupy land, but once the hostilities are over, occupied territory has to be left completely. You show me when Palestinians have ceased hostilities since 1967? If they would put half the effort of destroying Israel into building a country of their own they would have had one 40 years ago.

From another forum:
"Another amusing thing is that, now all the Arabs are calling for the 1967 borders, why is then that before 1967 they were all so determined to do away with Israel anyway ? So they lost the wars... and now they want to make peace by trading it for what they lost when they lost the war ? thats hilarious."

"After they lost [in 1948], Jordan and Egypt illegally occupied Judea, Samaria and Gaza from 1948 through 1967. And in all those years there was no movement by the Arabs to liberate from Jordan and Egypt those lands."

Here is an interesting report from a doctor in Gaza in the article they quote from ynet it's interesting how even the IDF dosn't agree with his low figures on the death toll. Is the doctor lying? Is he uninformed? Or does the IDF want people to belive the death toll was higher as a scare tactic? Woud be interesting to know.

Here are some videos on how much Hamas cares about the Palestinians. They can shove that %90 of their budget straight up their asses for this. It goes on and on and on... It's sad that I didn't even have to try and find this stuff it's all right there dozens of videos on youtube alone.

In the last few days I have been thinking allot about what kind of differences there are in upbringings and culture that makes people so very different in every way. I also ran across the following while reading a novel the other day I thought it described what I was thinking about.

"The problem with you Americans (I would say most of western civilization) is that you don't believe in evil. The CIA and FBI and definitely the guys at State don't properly anticipate horrible, catastrophic events because they don't really believe in the presence of evil, the presence of a dark and wicked and nefarious spiritual dimension that drives some men to do the unthinkable. Saddam Hussein, for example. Saddam tells the world for years that he has a territorial claim on Kuwait. Builds up his armed forces. Develops weapons of mass destruction. moves troops to the border. Signals everyone he's going in. But all the boys and girls and the CIA and DIA say Saddam won't do it. Just wants to drive up the price of oil. Just saber rattling. Just flexing his muscles. Couldn't possibly invade. Why would he? It would make no sense. It would be irrational. No Arab nation has ever invaded another Arab nation. Why start now? On the one hand you say that Saddam is a rational person but a liar. He says he'll invade Kuwait, but you say he doesn't mean it. He's just lying. He's just bluffing. He's just playing with our heads. But then when he did invade you decided he was a lunatic - crazy, Unpredictable, irrational, a nut case.  Saddam Hussein was not a lunatic and, in that case, he wasn't a liar. He was rational and calculating and evil. So he told the world what he was going to do - commit an act of evil, not and act of madness - and then he did it. It took a bunch of highly paid analysts with Harvard degrees to completely miss the simplicity of the moment.  I believe Saddam Hussein is (was) both capable of and prone to acts of unspeakable evil, and you don't. I'm right and you're wrong. It's not because I know more than your government. I don't. I know less. But I believe that evil forces make evil men do evil things."

I believe this speaks straight to the issue at hand because we can all argue this thing into the ground but at the end of the day we see this whole thing very differently. I believe that many of these people, especially Hamas (who are in charge), are evil. They have stated it, they have prepared for it, they have done it, and they don't hide it. So many people I talk to about this situation believe that Hamas has somehow fallen from their original goals of the destruction of Israel and that all they want now is the 1967 borders and a place to call Palestine because there is no way a terrorist organization with the will means and history of evil would ever lie cheat steal murder and deceive the whole world if they could to achieve their goals because after all they are only human beings right?  :rolleyes:

Well ladies and gents. There is such a thing as evil human beings and if you wouldn't put it past these people to do one of the most horrific of human actions and intentionally murder innocent people how can you put it past them to do one of the most basic human actions that every man woman and child alive has done, lie.
What you don't see with your eyes, don't invent with your mouth. Yiddish proverb

 

Offline Rick James

  • Scathed By Admins
  • 27
Christ and Hunter, this just keeps getting worse. There is peace along the Gaza strip for now, but for how long? Check out this 60 Minutes Clip.

I sense another long-simmering prelude to explosive conflict.

Boystrous 19 year old temp at work slapped me in the face with an envelope and laughed it off as playful. So I shoved him over a desk and laughed it off as playful. It's on camera so I can plead reasonable force.  Temp is now passive.

 

Offline Polpolion

  • The sizzle, it thinks!
  • 211
Somehow, I find people looking for a single side of this issue to place all of the blame on ridiculous. Frankly enough, these people have been at each other's throats for long enough that any reasonable clear cut solution isn't viable.

If Israel up and up apologized for its actions and genuinely administered as much humanitarian aid as it could, I still can't see the Palestinians being content with that. Somehow, I just think they'd take advantage of the situation and try and (figuratively) rape Israel. And this is what the Israeli government is probably thinking.

If the Palestinians and Hamas just stopped launching rockets and being offensive, Israel would have less of a justified reason to bomb them. But Israel would find an excuse to tighten the chain and go hunting for terrorists. And that why Hamas hasn't stopped fighting; because they're probably think that once they stop hostilities, Israel will (figuratively) rape Gaza and its populace.

Past that, I don't know enough about the situation to propose a viable solution. My first thought would be to have a third party just move in with force, and put Hamas in charge of Israel and Israelis in charge of Gaza. Neither side would have too much authority, though, because the third party would be making sure that people didn't launch rockets at each other or bomb people. After that, all I could think of is some kind of large-scale re-education of everyone to try and make them hate each other less. It may take a couple generations, but eventually, the third-party would be able to pull out. That's the problem. It'd be much more expensive and long-lasting then the Iraqi conflict is for the US, but its goal might be a little clearer, and the third party would go in with intent to rebuild, not remove from power. But this isn't doable because it would probably cost more lives than this conflict, and Palestinians and Israelis already doesn't want anyone meddling.

I really hope someone knows how to fix this, because I sure don't.

 

Offline Flipside

  • əp!sd!l£
  • 212
Exactly, Israel needs to release it's chokehold, but it can't until Hamas proves that it can be trusted not to try and use that gesture to obtain more means to attack Israel, and Palestine cannot do anything to divert it's people's hatred away from Israel when there is nothing left to live for but vengeance for crimes of the past.

I'm tempted to drop into Babylon 5 references, the situation is all too close, two peoples losing their humanity for the sake of vengeance and a blood-soaked form of 'justice', so consumed by hatred for each other that they cannot see that they are destroying everything they are in their pursuit of it.

 

Offline TrashMan

  • T-tower Avenger. srsly.
  • 213
  • God-Emperor of your kind!
    • FLAMES OF WAR
Sorry I have been out of this for a bit lots of work and real life goings on. I am not responding to specific posts here I am just throwing a few things on the flames.

International law states that occupying land is not illegal in itself, during war it's allowed to temporarily occupy land, but once the hostilities are over, occupied territory has to be left completely. You show me when Palestinians have ceased hostilities since 1967? If they would put half the effort of destroying Israel into building a country of their own they would have had one 40 years ago.

Ha! Trying to justify an occupation under such pretenses is laughable.
So if I were to invade your country and fuel some resistance against me, then  I could hold your land for eternity, as long as there is someone who opposes me?



Quote
I believe this speaks straight to the issue at hand because we can all argue this thing into the ground but at the end of the day we see this whole thing very differently. I believe that many of these people, especially Hamas (who are in charge), are evil. They have stated it, they have prepared for it, they have done it, and they don't hide it. So many people I talk to about this situation believe that Hamas has somehow fallen from their original goals of the destruction of Israel and that all they want now is the 1967 borders and a place to call Palestine because there is no way a terrorist organization with the will means and history of evil would ever lie cheat steal murder and deceive the whole world if they could to achieve their goals because after all they are only human beings right?  :rolleyes:

Well ladies and gents. There is such a thing as evil human beings and if you wouldn't put it past these people to do one of the most horrific of human actions and intentionally murder innocent people how can you put it past them to do one of the most basic human actions that every man woman and child alive has done, lie.


Yes, there are pretty evil human beings. Problem is, they're not all neatly packed on one side of the border for you to point at. I consider half of Israeli leadership worse than any Hamas member, for various resons.
As for the needed defense..

Tell me, why did the IDF bomb food and clothing factories, water planets, and even the biggest mill in the region? Now the palestinians have to import flour from ISRAEL at 50% higher prices. Nothing strange about that? nooooooooo :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
Nobody dies as a virgin - the life ****s us all!

You're a wrongularity from which no right can escape!

 
Ha! Trying to justify an occupation under such pretenses is laughable.
So if I were to invade your country and fuel some resistance against me, then  I could hold your land for eternity, as long as there is someone who opposes me?

You can take it up with international law. They started a war they lost but they are still fighting so the war isn't over and Legally Israel doesn't need to withdraw it's troops. Now this doesn't mean I don't think they should. And it certainly doesn't encompass building settlements which IS illegal you will get no argument from me. But under these terms the military occupation and control of that area is legal and it doesn't really matter what you or I think about it.

I found it especially amusing because this little tidbit was brought up in another forum by a Muslim guy who really really dislikes Israel and thinks everything is a conspiracy.

Yes, there are pretty evil human beings. Problem is, they're not all neatly packed on one side of the border for you to point at. I consider half of Israeli leadership worse than any Hamas member, for various resons.

I didn't say they were only on one side and you completely dodged the whole point. And you and I know why. It's because you and everyone who thinks about it will know it is true. There is no way anyone can say for sure what they do or do not intend but what they are capable of is a proven historical fact therefore their sudden revocation of their 'constitution' and willingness to make peace on the 1967 borders can certainly and logically be seen with a great deal of doubt and cynicism.

Politicians talk and talk but at the end of the day no one can truly take them at their word and they are judged by their actions. Shouldn't that at the very least be the same standard we hold a radical terrorist organization to? You say no, only because you can sit there in your safe house and say "Well you should believe them they have turned over a new leaf." because if you are wrong it's not the blood of your children being spilled so why should you care right? It's all so easy from far away. They aren't evil they are simply desperate human beings or lunatics.

"The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?"

Tell me, why did the IDF bomb food and clothing factories, water planets, and even the biggest mill in the region? Now the palestinians have to import flour from ISRAEL at 50% higher prices. Nothing strange about that? nooooooooo :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

I don't know what incidents you are referring too... if you would provide a link that would help. If you wanted me to simply guess I would say weapons caches. You have to understand a terrorist isn't stupid. They know they cannot win in a direct military conflict. Therefore they give everything a dual purpose. An unassuming building that serves civilians used as a weapons cache will either avoid detection because of it's obscure placement or when it is found and destroyed it serves as a humanitarian crisis depriving the civilians of whatever that building used to provide causing international media outrage and a win win situation for the bad guys. (did you like those videos of the Hamas firing rockets from civilian buildings and using children as human shields?) This again requires you to believe in evil. Not just idiotic lunatics but calculating smart people who believe what they are doing is fulfilling their gods will. But unfortunately the media and the rest of the world fall hook line and sinker for this ploy every time again and again.
What you don't see with your eyes, don't invent with your mouth. Yiddish proverb

 

Offline TrashMan

  • T-tower Avenger. srsly.
  • 213
  • God-Emperor of your kind!
    • FLAMES OF WAR
You can take it up with international law. They started a war they lost but they are still fighting so the war isn't over and Legally Israel doesn't need to withdraw it's troops. Now this doesn't mean I don't think they should. And it certainly doesn't encompass building settlements which IS illegal you will get no argument from me. But under these terms the military occupation and control of that area is legal and it doesn't really matter what you or I think about it.

It's a hole in the law Israel exploits, that much we all gathered.


Quote
I didn't say they were only on one side and you completely dodged the whole point. And you and I know why.
We do? :wtf:

Quote
It's because you and everyone who thinks about it will know it is true. There is no way anyone can say for sure what they do or do not intend but what they are capable of is a proven historical fact therefore their sudden revocation of their 'constitution' and willingness to make peace on the 1967 borders can certainly and logically be seen with a great deal of doubt and cynicism.

Politicians talk and talk but at the end of the day no one can truly take them at their word and they are judged by their actions. Shouldn't that at the very least be the same standard we hold a radical terrorist organization to? You say no, only because you can sit there in your safe house and say "Well you should believe them they have turned over a new leaf." because if you are wrong it's not the blood of your children being spilled so why should you care right? It's all so easy from far away. They aren't evil they are simply desperate human beings or lunatics.

I think about it and I came to a different conclusion.
If you're judging based only on actions, then by that logic half of Israel should have been nuked ages ago, together with all the other warmongering idiots in Plastine.



Quote
Tell me, why did the IDF bomb food and clothing factories, water planets, and even the biggest mill in the region? Now the palestinians have to import flour from ISRAEL at 50% higher prices. Nothing strange about that? nooooooooo :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

I don't know what incidents you are referring too... if you would provide a link that would help. If you wanted me to simply guess I would say weapons caches. You have to understand a terrorist isn't stupid. They know they cannot win in a direct military conflict. Therefore they give everything a dual purpose. An unassuming building that serves civilians used as a weapons cache will either avoid detection because of it's obscure placement or when it is found and destroyed it serves as a humanitarian crisis depriving the civilians of whatever that building used to provide causing international media outrage and a win win situation for the bad guys. (did you like those videos of the Hamas firing rockets from civilian buildings and using children as human shields?) This again requires you to believe in evil. Not just idiotic lunatics but calculating smart people who believe what they are doing is fulfilling their gods will. But unfortunately the media and the rest of the world fall hook line and sinker for this ploy every time again and again.

It's always weapons chaches or terrorist. Everywhere. Under every rock. Level the whole damn country while you're at it.

Even if there were weapon chances in the mill (and I've seen no proof whatsoever there ever was anything in there, like the UNWRA headquaters), given the importance of that structure to the whole civilian population, you shouldn't destroy it. Send troops to search it or size it.
But cutting millions of people from water and food is easier right...and not genocidal?
Nobody dies as a virgin - the life ****s us all!

You're a wrongularity from which no right can escape!

 
It's a hole in the law Israel exploits, that much we all gathered.

A hole in the law would be doing something it doesn't directly address. This is exactly what it addresses for these exact purposes so that when a country is under attack they can occupy an area of the enemy. The only holes here are the 7 you and I both posses and the one in your argument.

I think about it and I came to a different conclusion.
If you're judging based only on actions, then by that logic half of Israel should have been nuked ages ago, together with all the other warmongering idiots in Plastine.

Again you go off ignoring the point. The whole point was simply to point people to the fact that just because this group says something doesn't make it truth especially considering their history.

And yet again I WILL address what YOU said because it's just common courtesy.

If you want to talk about actions in the way of seeking peace (which is what I was talking about with Hamas) Then I will introduce you to Jordan and Egypt both enjoying lasting peace with Israel. I will also introduce you to my 10,000 Arab Muslim neighbors in Beit Tzafafa who don't live behind any checkpoints or military siege. I would also introduce you to the 90% of the 500 people at my work who are Arab Muslims.

So again, because of their history I am cynical about Hamas' claims for peace. I hope I don't have to repeat this again because I don't know how to make this any simpler.
It's always weapons chaches or terrorist. Everywhere. Under every rock. Level the whole damn country while you're at it.

Even if there were weapon chances in the mill (and I've seen no proof whatsoever there ever was anything in there, like the UNWRA headquaters), given the importance of that structure to the whole civilian population, you shouldn't destroy it. Send troops to search it or size it.
But cutting millions of people from water and food is easier right...and not genocidal?

I have yet to see proof that there was a mill at all. would you please link to stories you are talking about? I have no doubt there is but how can you expect anyone to guess at what was going on?

And there ARE weapons caches or terrorist hideouts or rocket or mortar launchers everywhere. You laugh but you actually don't have any idea how true it is what you are so flippantly saying.

Depending on the location you may be right about the air strike or you may be wrong. If it was in a field far away from the city or residential areas where ambushes could easily be laid and lots of civilian targets I would say sure send an incursion of ground troops in to the mill. However if it was in the middle of Gaza city the risk to the soldiers and other human life would be to great for just one target. You send in troops and there will be gunfights and people caught in the crossfire and in such a densely populated area such as that... better to use a precision air strike and take out the building.

Yeah it's a shame that it was a building that was meant for the good, but when it is used for evil are you going to blame the people who made it evil or the people who destroyed the evil? The media doesn't report on it so I wouldn't expect you to know this but the Palestinians blame Israel and or Hamas for their troubles. They all blame someone sometimes both but after this last war the amount of people who laid the blame solely on Hamas GREW precisely for the reasons YOU just stated. For the mills and water plants for the houses and schools because unlike you they are under no illusion that hamas does and WANTS to use these facilities to illicit exactly the response you are giving them.

I hope the media figures this out one day that it's partially because they have played into Hamas hands that the Palestinian children and civilians are being put in harms way. Sickening.
What you don't see with your eyes, don't invent with your mouth. Yiddish proverb

 

Offline Flipside

  • əp!sd!l£
  • 212
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/7853803.stm

Here we go again. See what I mean? Absolutely itching for a chance to kill each other at every step, one blows up a soldier, the other starts dropping bombs, and when those bombs stop falling, another soldier will die and it will start all over again.

Sometimes I could just weep for the general bloodthirstiness of humanity.

 

Offline Mika

  • 28
Nothing in the world could have prepared me for those children shows, and I do have fought one against four in the street (me being alone) and seen and stopped a suicide attempt and served in the Defence Forces where the armored vehicle where I was sitting went out of the road around 80 km/h (lucky that it was armored at least)... I simply cannot escape the feeling is that stuff for real? Seriously?! Not some kind of sick joke from Israeli side? It is very hard to believe my eyes on this case since it is so god-damn blatant and I simply don't believe anyone from UN wouldn't have seen that!

Why the hell they never show that stuff here? I don't accept this nation spending a single cent as foreign aid towards Middle East. I'm glad I saw those videos through YouTube at least, not on location, that would have been far worse.

Mika
Relaxed movement is always more effective than forced movement.