Author Topic: New Stargate: Stargate Universe  (Read 48354 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline MR_T3D

  • 29
  • Personal Text
Re: New Stargate: Stargate Universe
the main thing that bugged me was that the rush character seemed an AWFUL lot like baltar, and...
Spoiler:
...i bet he totally tipped off the ha'tak's
seemed alright,

and i liked seasons 9&10, mainly 10 because I frankly liked Vala.
but yeah, they were taked on, maybe they should have been on atlantis, but O-T.

 

Offline Blue Lion

  • Star Shatterer
  • 210
Re: New Stargate: Stargate Universe
I think the characters will be fleshed out as they go. They can't have it more like SG-1 where everyone loved each other.

 

Offline deathfun

  • 210
  • Hey man. Peace. *Car hits them* Frakking hippies
Re: New Stargate: Stargate Universe
Quote
SG-1 was an almost complete reversal from the movie.

I thought differently, but then again it's been a while since I've seen the movie and the
"No"

 
Re: New Stargate: Stargate Universe
SG-1 had really nothing to do with the movie except for the concept of the Goa'uld, the Stargate, and Colonel O'Neil and Daniel Jackson[despite the former being played by a different actor having a totally different take on the character]
'yo my domestic skillets, who put swarm torpedoes on the Tev bombers?'
~Nighteyes

 

Offline The E

  • He's Ebeneezer Goode
  • 213
  • Nothing personal, just tech support.
    • Steam
    • Twitter
Re: New Stargate: Stargate Universe
Both were played by different actors. It has been implied that SG-1 exists in a prallel universe to the movie.
If I'm just aching this can't go on
I came from chasing dreams to feel alone
There must be changes, miss to feel strong
I really need lifе to touch me
--Evergrey, Where August Mourns

 
Re: New Stargate: Stargate Universe
That actually makes some sense in the series canon, given that alternate universes are apparently all over the place.
"You need to believe in things that aren't true. How else can they become?" -DEATH, Discworld

 
Re: New Stargate: Stargate Universe
Both were played by different actors. It has been implied that SG-1 exists in a prallel universe to the movie.
Shows just how long its been since I watched the movie. :lol: Never really liked it anyway.
'yo my domestic skillets, who put swarm torpedoes on the Tev bombers?'
~Nighteyes

 

Offline Thaeris

  • Can take his lumps
  • 211
  • Away in Limbo
Re: New Stargate: Stargate Universe
Kind of a lame rationalization... the parallel universe->movie factor, that is. I liked the movie a good deal, actually. Didn't have all the cheesy aspects that tend to afflict the sci-fi drama series.

...I thought the actor who played Jackson in the series was the same as the movie Jackson... but that's not too important. O'Neil was definately noticable as being different from the film, but it's all good: ...we've got freakin' MacGyver... you're already one paperclip-in-rubber band's-width away from defeat!!!
"trolls are clearly social rejects and therefore should be isolated from society, or perhaps impaled."

-Nuke



"Look on the bright side, how many release dates have been given for Doomsday, and it still isn't out yet.

It's the Duke Nukem Forever of prophecies..."


"Jesus saves.

Everyone else takes normal damage.
"

-Flipside

"pirating software is a lesser evil than stealing but its still evil. but since i pride myself for being evil, almost anything is fair game."


"i never understood why women get the creeps so ****ing easily. i mean most serial killers act perfectly normal, until they kill you."


-Nuke

 
Re: New Stargate: Stargate Universe
The original Daniel was played by James Spader, who did look at lot like Michael Shanks. But yeah, MacGyver FTW! :lol:
'yo my domestic skillets, who put swarm torpedoes on the Tev bombers?'
~Nighteyes

 

Offline Liberator

  • Poe's Law In Action
  • 210
Re: New Stargate: Stargate Universe
Shanks has copped to aping Spader's performance in the film for the first 2 or 3 seasons till he realized that it wasn't going anywhere.
So as through a glass, and darkly
The age long strife I see
Where I fought in many guises,
Many names, but always me.

There are only 10 types of people in the world , those that understand binary and those that don't.

 

Offline Fury

  • The Curmudgeon
  • 213
Re: New Stargate: Stargate Universe
There was a difference after 2-3 seasons?

 

Offline Mefustae

  • 210
  • Chevron locked...
Re: New Stargate: Stargate Universe
When did he get the haircut?

Oh, and Stargate: Universe? I love it. I more than love it. It's what you get when you suck about 75% of the happiness out of the Stargate verse and put desperation and poor lighting in its place. Seriously, I'm looking forward to this. I can't wait to see the characters fleshed out, the Destiny explored, and the awesome additions to the Stargate mythos.

That said, it's not without its problems. It dragged slightly in one or two places, and the cutting between timeframes was a bit jarring without any real indication it was happening. But the latter was probably just because I was viewing it without the benefit of ad breaks. I also found myself shouting at the screen in certain places, namely "use the goddamn Asgard beams you nit", but at the same time I was smiling my ass off at all the little allusions to SG-1 and Atlantis. It's the little things that really place it in the universe, and help keep it grounded in the Stargate mythos. No matter how much the direction, cinematography, and style has changed, it still came across as a Stargate show. So it really wins in my mind from that alone.

 

Offline Nuke

  • Ka-Boom!
  • 212
  • Mutants Worship Me
Re: New Stargate: Stargate Universe
i thought it was pretty good. its still on the dvr so im gonna probibly watch it again
I can no longer sit back and allow communist infiltration, communist indoctrination, communist subversion, and the international communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids.

Nuke's Scripting SVN

 

Offline NGTM-1R

  • I reject your reality and substitute my own
  • 213
  • Syndral Active. 0410.
Re: New Stargate: Stargate Universe
I also found myself shouting at the screen in certain places, namely "use the goddamn Asgard beams you nit"

I'm still waiting for a return to the ultimate VLS nuke spam we saw at Atlantis' Battle of the Abyss.
"Load sabot. Target Zaku, direct front!"

A Feddie Story

 

Offline starbug

  • 210
    • DarkSide Animations
Stargate Universe pilot, opinions
I have just watched the pilot of SGU and thought it was very good, well written, liked the new highly detailed Go-auld hataks! Also nice to have another fellow scottish actor on the stargate universe. Wish that sky would ave shown the 3rd episode as well but hey. I think that this could turn out to be a very good series indeed.
http://www.youtube.com/user/AnubisX1

if there is any consistancy with the Shivans, it's their lack of consistancy - -Norbert-

 

Offline General Battuta

  • Poe's Law In Action
  • 214
  • i wonder when my postcount will exceed my iq
Re: New Stargate: Stargate Universe
Topics merged.

 

Offline Topgun

  • 210
Re: New Stargate: Stargate Universe
in the movie, apophis Ra was an energy being, not a snake.

 

Offline MR_T3D

  • 29
  • Personal Text
Re: New Stargate: Stargate Universe
in the movie, apophis Ra was an energy being, not a snake.
yeah... that's weird, but snakeheads>energy-crazy-being ****.
i don't think it counts as 'cannon' when it conflicts with the series.

 

Offline Mongoose

  • Rikki-Tikki-Tavi
  • Global Moderator
  • 212
  • This brain for rent.
    • Steam
    • Something
Re: New Stargate: Stargate Universe
What about counting as "canon"? :p

 
Re: New Stargate: Stargate Universe
in the movie, apophis Ra was an energy being, not a snake.

Yeah and Abaddos was supposed be halfway across the universe in another galaxy.

Of course there are inconsistencies, it's just a tv seris adaptation. One has to throw out some of the original movie to make it work . . .