Author Topic: Sexual addiction/lack of commitment/ lone wolf syndrome (Read 42271 times)

redsniper · **Reply #140 on:** November 01, 2009, 03:22:46 pm

and friends want to "just be friends" so... yeah.

iamzack · **Reply #141 on:** November 01, 2009, 03:26:34 pm

friend zone is a myth. it's really the "youre okay as a friend, but i wouldnt date you under any circumstances because you suck in some way"

Colonol Dekker · **Reply #142 on:** November 01, 2009, 03:40:00 pm

That IS the friend zone. Over familiarity breeds contempt, contempt is exciting newstuffs natural predator.

When you first meet a woman and take her out, treat her to dinner at a west venue and maybe a play or something. It's ll WHOOP WHOOP etc. If you are in the social circle too long without asserting yourself as "not another friend" you are tarred, and feathered. . . Bar lonely emo-sex or drunken mistakes.

iamzack · **Reply #143 on:** November 01, 2009, 03:43:19 pm

yeah, if you're ugly you dont stand a chance unless she doesn't know you're also boring yet.

NGTM-1R · **Reply #144 on:** November 01, 2009, 03:49:29 pm

Quote from: Colonol Dekker on November 01, 2009, 01:18:50 pm

But much less rewarding in life skill points.

And conversely, much more rewarding over the long term. Paradox.

Colonol Dekker · **Reply #145 on:** November 01, 2009, 03:59:21 pm

Shagging every bird I know although fun would limit my contacts and alienate me from female interaction in the long run.

New birds are new

iamzack · **Reply #146 on:** November 01, 2009, 04:00:46 pm

That's just sex, that's different from dating/relationships. Duh.

Colonol Dekker · **Reply #147 on:** November 01, 2009, 04:22:12 pm

No emotional attachment with sex is a sign of poor character. Or lack of self respect

Liberator · **Reply #148 on:** November 01, 2009, 04:24:37 pm

Quote

That's just sex, that's different from dating/relationships. Duh.

Umm, no it's not, it's significantly more intimate.

Course I'm speaking from a completely theoretical standpoint.

The odds of me ever partaking of that particular activity are somewhere between zero and negative numbers.

Colonol Dekker · **Reply #149 on:** November 01, 2009, 04:26:12 pm

Quote from: Colonol Dekker on November 01, 2009, 04:22:12 pm

No emotional attachment, with sex is a sign of poor character. Or lack of self respect

I meant lack of emotional attachment means you lose, not...

NO! Emotional sex = teh lose.

iamzack · **Reply #150 on:** November 01, 2009, 04:32:21 pm

Quote from: Liberator on November 01, 2009, 04:24:37 pm

Quote
That's just sex, that's different from dating/relationships. Duh.
Umm, no it's not, it's significantly more intimate.

Sex isn't necessarily intimate. That's just a fact. Some people prefer it intimate and emotional, but it's just a preference. Everybody has them.

Colonol Dekker · **Reply #151 on:** November 01, 2009, 04:33:23 pm

Even raw unbridled rutting needs to stem from an emotional drive / cause.

iamzack · **Reply #152 on:** November 01, 2009, 04:35:34 pm

In as much as any activity does.

Colonol Dekker · **Reply #153 on:** November 01, 2009, 04:44:35 pm

Oh no... there are some activities i could well do without. Work being one of them. And idle chit-chat. Thats purely formal and a means to live.

iamzack · **Reply #154 on:** November 01, 2009, 04:45:24 pm

any recreational activity*

Colonol Dekker · **Reply #155 on:** November 01, 2009, 04:47:07 pm

Sex without emotional drive is completely different though.

iamzack · **Reply #156 on:** November 01, 2009, 04:51:42 pm

what's your point?

Colonol Dekker · **Reply #157 on:** November 01, 2009, 04:57:12 pm

That until you've grown a set of man junk you should just keep the de-railing to your OH SNAP RELATIONSHIPS!

iamzack · **Reply #158 on:** November 01, 2009, 05:15:02 pm

do you ever say anything coherent?

General Battuta · **Reply #159 on:** November 01, 2009, 05:24:58 pm

Quote from: Colonol Dekker on November 01, 2009, 04:57:12 pm

That until you've grown a set of man junk you should just keep the de-railing to your OH SNAP RELATIONSHIPS!

Just FYI, women are slightly more likely to seek sex for physical satisfaction and men slightly more likely to seek sex for emotional intimacy.

On the metanalytic level there's no clear difference at all between motivation for sex in either gender.

News:

Author Topic: Sexual addiction/lack of commitment/ lone wolf syndrome (Read 42271 times)

Re: Sexual addiction/lack of commitment/ lone wolf syndrome

Re: Sexual addiction/lack of commitment/ lone wolf syndrome

Re: Sexual addiction/lack of commitment/ lone wolf syndrome

Re: Sexual addiction/lack of commitment/ lone wolf syndrome

Re: Sexual addiction/lack of commitment/ lone wolf syndrome

Re: Sexual addiction/lack of commitment/ lone wolf syndrome

Re: Sexual addiction/lack of commitment/ lone wolf syndrome

Re: Sexual addiction/lack of commitment/ lone wolf syndrome

Re: Sexual addiction/lack of commitment/ lone wolf syndrome

Re: Sexual addiction/lack of commitment/ lone wolf syndrome

Re: Sexual addiction/lack of commitment/ lone wolf syndrome

Re: Sexual addiction/lack of commitment/ lone wolf syndrome

Re: Sexual addiction/lack of commitment/ lone wolf syndrome

Re: Sexual addiction/lack of commitment/ lone wolf syndrome

Re: Sexual addiction/lack of commitment/ lone wolf syndrome

Re: Sexual addiction/lack of commitment/ lone wolf syndrome

Re: Sexual addiction/lack of commitment/ lone wolf syndrome

Re: Sexual addiction/lack of commitment/ lone wolf syndrome

Re: Sexual addiction/lack of commitment/ lone wolf syndrome

Re: Sexual addiction/lack of commitment/ lone wolf syndrome