My whole outrage is whether or not this is actually facebook's invention. Myspace and twitter have their own forms of news feed that essentially do the same thing. So, does this patent cover all implementations of news feed? Or just facebook's implementation of it (i'm hoping it just covers facebook's implementation, but the article doesn't go in this direction at all, or could be the article is assuming too much)?
The other thing is that facebook has had newsfeed for a while. Why didn't they try going for a patent before it was in use? That'd be a little smarter than getting a patent after the fact (who knows, there's little evidence showing that facebook perhaps wasn't able to get a patent before hand).
In the area of whether or not this is facebook's invention or not (pertaining to the theory that there patent covers all implementations of a news feed)...there's different forms of news feed around. The most primitive and usual form of news feed would be the home page for hard-light (the few yearly updates that get posted there with community highlights), a blog, or just a normal web site in general where the owner posts updates regularly via html. Which finally makes me think, why does this need to get patented at all?