Author Topic: bobbtmann's Version, still in existence. (Read 31296 times)

bobbtmann · **Reply #60 on:** March 21, 2011, 10:34:17 pm

It wasn't meant as a putdown. It's just that the discussion of competition between Rga_noris and myself is not worth making. I am not a member of the FSU team, so I haven't commited the time to upgrading FS2 that actual members have. I can't just parachute into the board and expect them to prioritize my model over anyone elses.

Commander Zane · **Reply #61 on:** March 21, 2011, 11:28:21 pm

Quote from: bobbtmann on March 21, 2011, 10:04:24 pm

I hadn't realized that creating a new thread was tactless. I made a new one because my old thread had become full of images of Rga_noris' stuff. It was on my thread that he unveiled his ship. I felt it was no longer mine anymore, so I made a new one.

As to the futility of the work, it doesn't bother me much. It has became apparent that my take on the Sathanas will probably never amount to anything more than another entry on freespacemods.net.

I've already said before I'm sure as hell using it if you finish it.

Zacam · **Reply #62 on:** March 21, 2011, 11:47:53 pm

Further more, FSU is about community. It doesn't matter if a Staff member makes a model, that's not automagic inclusion if another version comes along.

Everything get's evaluated to the same criteria. The only thing having an FSU Badge means is that you have less room for mistakes to be made in.

I encourage everybody to do any amount of awesome work that they can. Even if -you- (generic sense usage, encompassing) don't think your work is awesome, you've done something, and that's pretty awesome right there.

So, let's just put this "who did what when for how many cookies" to rest, have a glass of milk, and see how bob progresses on his work, since this is his thread for HIS work. Which I for one appreciate and can't wait to see what sort of details will emerge from the texturing, if I'm correct in assuming that it is in that phase.

Luis Dias · **Reply #63 on:** March 22, 2011, 03:15:45 pm

Quote from: headdie on March 21, 2011, 01:22:59 pm

Quote from: Luis Dias on March 21, 2011, 12:35:35 pm
Quote from: mjn.mixael on March 21, 2011, 12:28:55 pm
The timing of the announcements is not important. This thread is about bob's work. Can we keep it that way?

It becomes important if the question that arose over there was about the futility of bob's work, or his lact of "tact" (or common sense or wtv) on creating this thread.

Try this is a free community for ppl to do what they want, look. Stop *****ing about if bob should do this and support him in making suggestions on how things could be improved and generally be nice about it if you have no suggestions.

By limiting what is created we limit the options for creating mods

You got me backwards. I was defending Bob. And no, Bob, it's not tactless at all, albeit I got that feeling coming up from some posters back there. Pay no attention, and please continue the good work

.

Rga_Noris · **Reply #64 on:** March 22, 2011, 04:00:09 pm

Just to be clear, bobbtmann and I both waited until we had committed a significant amount of time before revealing our projects. Sure, I revealed mine after his, but we were both in the same spot development-wise at the same time.

So he developed his in secret no less than I did. What I am guilty of is hi jacking his thread a little bit, which is why I created a separate thread, and why he created this one.

mjn.mixael · **Reply #65 on:** March 22, 2011, 04:58:54 pm

Quote from: Rga_Noris on March 22, 2011, 04:00:09 pm

Just to be clear, bobbtmann and I both waited until we had committed a significant amount of time before revealing our projects. Sure, I revealed mine after his, but we were both in the same spot development-wise at the same time.

So he developed his in secret no less than I did. What I am guilty of is hi jacking his thread a little bit, which is why I created a separate thread, and why he created this one.

Good summary... can everyone move on now please?

Ulala · **Reply #66 on:** March 23, 2011, 12:42:35 am

This one definitely looks more menacing which I very much like. It also looks more like the

concept art version which is cool.

Can't wait to see more!

Raiden · **Reply #67 on:** March 25, 2011, 09:57:51 am

I really like the more 'out-there' design of this Sath. It looks dirty, ragged and horrible, just as it should. I do really like RGA's version as well, which is more like the retail model broght up to modern standards, but this one just oozes evil. I can't see this model fading into obscurity if it doesn't go into the mvps, you can already see a lot of people prefer this one to the other. It's a bit too striking to be forgotton.

jr2 · **Reply #68 on:** April 28, 2011, 11:36:15 am

Any updates?

bobbtmann · **Reply #69 on:** April 28, 2011, 04:10:54 pm

Coming up shortly

bobbtmann · **Reply #70 on:** April 28, 2011, 04:51:48 pm

Sorry for the long break between updates. I've been working a lot (12+ hour shifts, 15 days a week), and it doesn't leave much time for modding. This weekend is the first time I've been home for a while

[attachment deleted by ninja]

Snail · **Reply #71 on:** April 28, 2011, 04:56:13 pm

I do say, this looks absolutely ****ing awesome.

Dragon · **Reply #72 on:** April 28, 2011, 04:56:44 pm

That looks nicely.[/understatement]

Luis Dias · **Reply #73 on:** April 28, 2011, 05:59:47 pm

Love it

jr2 · **Reply #74 on:** April 28, 2011, 06:01:06 pm

sw33t!

swashmebuckle · **Reply #75 on:** April 28, 2011, 06:47:15 pm

That is one bad ass ship

Commander Zane · **Reply #76 on:** April 28, 2011, 06:48:42 pm

Outstanding!

CommanderDJ · **Reply #77 on:** April 28, 2011, 08:38:39 pm

Damn that's awesome.

Rodo · **Reply #78 on:** April 28, 2011, 09:35:49 pm

**** yeah!

X3N0-Life-Form · **Reply #79 on:** April 29, 2011, 03:54:45 am

We're gonna have pair of epic Saths

News:

Author Topic: bobbtmann's Version, still in existence. (Read 31296 times)

Re: bobbtmann's Version, still in existance.

Re: bobbtmann's Version, still in existance.

Re: bobbtmann's Version, still in existance.

Re: bobbtmann's Version, still in existance.

Re: bobbtmann's Version, still in existance.

Re: bobbtmann's Version, still in existance.

Re: bobbtmann's Version, still in existance.

Re: bobbtmann's Version, still in existance.

Re: bobbtmann's Version, still in existance.

Re: bobbtmann's Version, still in existance.

Re: bobbtmann's Sathanas, still in existance.

Re: bobbtmann's Version, still in existance.

Re: bobbtmann's Version, still in existance.

Re: bobbtmann's Version, still in existance.

Re: bobbtmann's Version, still in existance.

Re: bobbtmann's Version, still in existance.

Re: bobbtmann's Version, still in existance.

Re: bobbtmann's Version, still in existance.

Re: bobbtmann's Version, still in existance.

Re: bobbtmann's Version, still in existance.