The special effects though, were in no way as good as Spider-Man's - they looked too 'fake' as I say, and the Yoda fight really was dumb-looking. Anakin fighting Dooku for about 0.389 seconds was better.
Oh, and Unkown Target - in what way was Spider-Man dumb? It was pretty faithful to the comic-book rendition, really considering the mangling these things usually go through.
[/B]
Special effects were a totally different category between spiderman and star wars... the effects were different! Star wars had blaster and lightsaber and ship effects, while spiderman had 'web' and 'flying' effects... they were both good!
Spiderman was pretty true to the book, except that
the web that came out of his wrists was made organic, while in the book he had a special cartridge he had to keep putting in!!!?
remember? they ruined the whole 'true to the comic book' by doing that.
otherwise it was awesome!
What?! Are you out of your mind? That's just not possible, surpass LOTR (at least the books) is not possible!
Anything's possible...
Star Wars is pretty close to LOTR as it is
The special effects though, were in no way as good as Spider-Man's - they looked too 'fake' as I say, and the Yoda fight really was dumb-looking. Anakin fighting Dooku for about 0.389 seconds was better.
Just because you're defending spiderman doesn't mean you've got to talk lies about Star Wars... anyone who watches it can see how awesome the special effects are. Sound and effects are two things
NO ONE can say about Star Wars!!!
Yoda fight scene was supposed to be comical... the whole movie (if you noticed) had much more jokes than any of the other Star Wars movies!
Uh, yeah Spiderman himself looks fake to a large degree, less so with Yoda who looks cool also SW gets extra marks just for being SW .
lol, i agree about the 'extra marks' thing

Spiderman looked good in the costume that he designed halfway through the movie, but
don't tell me he didn't look cheesy in that costume he wore the first half!!! (with the gloves and all) (the one he wrestled in)
Before having seen the movie I would've agreed - Spider-Man does look fake in the trailers. However, in the film itself he seemed a lot more 'real' - I can't explain it, except perhaps by saying that I only ever saw the trailers on TV. Still, the 'making of' documentary showed that it was actually a costume, not a CG thing. The bits that were CG were the 'impossible' stunts.
I'm guessing that in the Teaser, (the one with the two towers and the people that rob the bank) spiderman was 100% CG... no acting... it sure looked that way! I thought it was good animation, but i hoped there would be more acting.
in the real movie there was a lot more acting... hardly anything 'looked' CG. maybe in the 'making of' they said that it was an actual costume, but only in some parts, and definately not in the Teaser
