Originally posted by CP5670
That is fine, but you have not said why yet. 
Partly this is because I don't yet really
know why
myself. Finding one's way to life-beliefs can take time and effort.
Part of what troubles me about your 'logical' perspective is its seeming incompatibility with human behaviour. Since emotions, as you say cannot be rationalized, mathematicized and predicted with certainty, they do not seem logical. Indeed, from a perspective of mathematical logic they would not seem to exist absolutely. However, they quite patently do exist IMO (although I'm sure that I'm making some kind of logical error there). Basically what I'm saying is that your applications of a logical viewpoint to human problems seem questionable given the inherently illogical nature of humanity.
Perhaps this is due to conflicting base views. From what I have read from you, your belief in the Universe and humans seems to be of determinism, biological psychology and so on - something which I disagree with on a base level (though I find it difficult to articulate due to the nature of the subject, and the fact that it's nearly midnight and I got up at 7AM this morning).
I think the resistance to change for its own sake might [be?] getting to you; try turning into a radical guy.
Oh, don't get me wrong; I don't oppose all change - or do you mean that I oppose changes that happen not for a reason, but because they can? Anyway, I'm considered fairly radical though not in the directions that you are...
Of course I
want change - but I want it on my terms, like all other humans.
Oh, and the Unabomber article is an interesting read. "The Dangers of Leftism" indeed; I would like to see a comparative "Dangers of Rightism" analysis.
