Author Topic: Why Tatooine is plausible: the orbital mechanics of binary star systems  (Read 6450 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Bryan See

  • Has anyone really been far as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
  • 210
  • Trying to redeem, but under Tiger Parents
    • Skype
    • Steam
Why Tatooine is plausible: the orbital mechanics of binary star systems
From ExtremeTech.com:

While we’re all waiting for The Force Awakens to hit theaters, the time is again ripe for speculating on the plausibility of the Star Wars universe. Science fiction loves crazy astronomy — think Pandora, Halo, or Tatooine. The home planet of Luke Skywalker orbits a double star. But what do we know about how plausible the astronomy of Star Wars might be? How do you get a planet that has two suns?

Binary star systems are common throughout the observable universe; of the stars nearest our sun, about half are part of binary systems. For a long time, we didn’t even know whether a binary star system would be stable enough to allow matter to accrete to planetary dimensions. In 2014, researchers used gravitational microlensing to confirm that an exoplanet with the working name OGLE-2013-BLG-0341LBb orbits one star of a binary pair at a distance of some 3000 light-years from Earth.

This particular exoplanet orbits cool, dim stars and is therefore probably too cold to be habitable. But if you stood on its surface at the right time, you would see an unmistakable resemblance to the Tatooine sky: two suns, one bright, one dim. It’s certainly proof of concept. And what if those stars were just a little warmer, a little brighter? These are conditions that are tantalizingly suggestive of a real-life inhabitable planet just like Tatooine, somewhere in the universe we occupy.


Artist's impression of a binary star system. (Credit: NASA)

Truth may be stranger than fiction, though. It turns out that many multiple-star systems are actually groups of three stars called ternary systems, where one star orbits at some distance around a binary-star pair. It’s suspected that if the outer star had a rocky, Earth-like planet, it might be relatively more likely to harbor life because of the large Goldilocks zone created by the arrangement of the three parent stars.

An observer on the surface of a planet in such a system would experience varying night lengths and varying phases of daytime temperature and illumination, related to how many of their stars were in the sky at any given time: one, two, or all three. Or at least they would until the planet inevitably became tidally locked, which means that one side of the planet would face its star forever: a seared, uninhabitable afterscape. Nobody has yet confirmed life on other planets, which means that we don’t know whether it’s more or less likely to find life around a binary or ternary system, but a compelling case can be made for either.

Still more complex stellar systems have been observed. Earlier this year, a five-star system in Ursa Major was announced by researchers from the Open University. Two pairs of its five stars eclipse along our line of sight, consistent with the spin mechanics of a relatively stable system. Scientists believe that a planet in this system might only have one real night per year, since such an event would require all five of the stars to appear in conjunction. Here’s hoping there’s some sort of relationship between stellar radiation and the appearance of the Force in life forms on a given planet.
Bryan See - My FreeSpace Wiki User Page (Talk, Contributions)

Full Projects:
The Shattered Stars: A Deepness Within (Unreal Engine game project, IMDB)

Campaigns:
Lost in the Mist - Cyrene vs. Psamtik
FreeSpace: Reunited

Ships:
GTS Hygeia, GTT Argo, SC Raguel

Tools:
FSO TC/Game template

I've been under attack by Tiger Parents like Jennifer Pan...

 

Offline The E

  • He's Ebeneezer Goode
  • 213
  • Nothing personal, just tech support.
    • Steam
    • Twitter
Re: Why Tatooine is plausible: the orbital mechanics of binary star systems
If you're just reposting articles, you could do us all a favour and read them first. Note how the sentence "Or at least they would until the planet inevitably became tidally locked, which means that one side of the planet would face its star forever: a seared, uninhabitable afterscape." contradicts your thread title quite handily.
If I'm just aching this can't go on
I came from chasing dreams to feel alone
There must be changes, miss to feel strong
I really need lifе to touch me
--Evergrey, Where August Mourns

 

Offline jr2

  • The Mail Man
  • 212
  • It's prounounced jayartoo 0x6A7232
    • Steam
Re: Why Tatooine is plausible: the orbital mechanics of binary star systems
Yeah, except that's talking about ternary systems, which may be more common, and not binary, if my reading comprehension serves me..  :P

  

Offline Aesaar

  • 210
Re: Why Tatooine is plausible: the orbital mechanics of binary star systems
I thought the problem with Tatooine was that is a was a worldwide desert with very little plant life, so where does all the oxygen come from?  Star Wars does this sort of stuff a lot.  Mustafar had the same issue.  Volcano planet, livable and breathable atmosphere.  That planet should look like Venus or Io.

 

Offline jr2

  • The Mail Man
  • 212
  • It's prounounced jayartoo 0x6A7232
    • Steam
Re: Why Tatooine is plausible: the orbital mechanics of binary star systems
Rule of cool, or just no thought given to universe mechanics.  Take your pick, or both.  :sigh:

 

Offline Bobboau

  • Just a MODern kinda guy
    Just MODerately cool
    And MODest too
  • 213
Re: Why Tatooine is plausible: the orbital mechanics of binary star systems
lot of oxygen locked up in the mantle.

and tidally locked doesn't mean uninhabitable.
Bobboau, bringing you products that work... in theory
learn to use PCS
creator of the ProXimus Procedural Texture and Effect Generator
My latest build of PCS2, get it while it's hot!
PCS 2.0.3


DEUTERONOMY 22:11
Thou shalt not wear a garment of diverse sorts, [as] of woollen and linen together

 

Offline Bryan See

  • Has anyone really been far as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
  • 210
  • Trying to redeem, but under Tiger Parents
    • Skype
    • Steam
Re: Why Tatooine is plausible: the orbital mechanics of binary star systems
However, some planets could end up flying free from the gravitational influence of multiple stars they orbit, while some end up crashing at one of them, and others survive at stable orbits.
Bryan See - My FreeSpace Wiki User Page (Talk, Contributions)

Full Projects:
The Shattered Stars: A Deepness Within (Unreal Engine game project, IMDB)

Campaigns:
Lost in the Mist - Cyrene vs. Psamtik
FreeSpace: Reunited

Ships:
GTS Hygeia, GTT Argo, SC Raguel

Tools:
FSO TC/Game template

I've been under attack by Tiger Parents like Jennifer Pan...

 

Offline Scotty

  • 1.21 gigawatts!
  • 211
  • Guns, guns, guns.
Re: Why Tatooine is plausible: the orbital mechanics of binary star systems
Hey guys I have an idea:

It's a movie.

 

Offline watsisname

Re: Why Tatooine is plausible: the orbital mechanics of binary star systems
Lol, we've known for years that planets can form in multiple-star systems, and it is not very difficult for them to be habitable.  Consider Gliese 667 Cc for instance -- a potentially habitable planet with three suns.

It's tempting to think that multi-star systems would just be too dynamically crazy for planets, but you have to think about how stable configurations appear in n-body systems.  It follows a sort of binary addition rule, with stars grouping into pairs, pairs of pairs, etc.  Planetary systems can develop orbiting around a single sun with a distant partner, or orbiting around a close binary (circumbinary planets).  Habitability can arise in either scenario, depending on the masses and separations of the stars.  You can even have a planet orbiting a binary which forms a binary with another distant binary -- i.e. a quadruple star system.
In my world of sleepers, everything will be erased.
I'll be your religion, your only endless ideal.
Slowly we crawl in the dark.
Swallowed by the seductive night.

 

Offline Bobboau

  • Just a MODern kinda guy
    Just MODerately cool
    And MODest too
  • 213
Re: Why Tatooine is plausible: the orbital mechanics of binary star systems
Hey guys I have an idea:

It's a movie.

oh, I have an idea too!
What if a detail of that movie might be able to actually work in reality!
Bobboau, bringing you products that work... in theory
learn to use PCS
creator of the ProXimus Procedural Texture and Effect Generator
My latest build of PCS2, get it while it's hot!
PCS 2.0.3


DEUTERONOMY 22:11
Thou shalt not wear a garment of diverse sorts, [as] of woollen and linen together

 

Offline Scotty

  • 1.21 gigawatts!
  • 211
  • Guns, guns, guns.
Re: Why Tatooine is plausible: the orbital mechanics of binary star systems
Hey guys I have an idea:

It's a movie.

oh, I have an idea too!
What if a detail of that movie might be able to actually work in reality!

Then nothing would change.  At all.  Even imperceptibly.  Because it's still a movie.

 

Offline Bobboau

  • Just a MODern kinda guy
    Just MODerately cool
    And MODest too
  • 213
Re: Why Tatooine is plausible: the orbital mechanics of binary star systems
wow those people who are arguing against you sure must feel foolish right about now. all of them.
Bobboau, bringing you products that work... in theory
learn to use PCS
creator of the ProXimus Procedural Texture and Effect Generator
My latest build of PCS2, get it while it's hot!
PCS 2.0.3


DEUTERONOMY 22:11
Thou shalt not wear a garment of diverse sorts, [as] of woollen and linen together

 

Offline The E

  • He's Ebeneezer Goode
  • 213
  • Nothing personal, just tech support.
    • Steam
    • Twitter
Re: Why Tatooine is plausible: the orbital mechanics of binary star systems
Enough of this, Bob.
If I'm just aching this can't go on
I came from chasing dreams to feel alone
There must be changes, miss to feel strong
I really need lifе to touch me
--Evergrey, Where August Mourns

 

Offline Bobboau

  • Just a MODern kinda guy
    Just MODerately cool
    And MODest too
  • 213
Re: Why Tatooine is plausible: the orbital mechanics of binary star systems
of what exactly? Scotty was the one who came into a thread about the feasibility of a planetary system in a scifi movie and was all "herpder itamovie! nowt reel" as if it was a contribution. what exactly was his point? am I missing something painfully obvious?
Bobboau, bringing you products that work... in theory
learn to use PCS
creator of the ProXimus Procedural Texture and Effect Generator
My latest build of PCS2, get it while it's hot!
PCS 2.0.3


DEUTERONOMY 22:11
Thou shalt not wear a garment of diverse sorts, [as] of woollen and linen together

 

Offline deathfun

  • 210
  • Hey man. Peace. *Car hits them* Frakking hippies
Re: Why Tatooine is plausible: the orbital mechanics of binary star systems
of what exactly? Scotty was the one who came into a thread about the feasibility of a planetary system in a scifi movie and was all "herpder itamovie! nowt reel" as if it was a contribution. what exactly was his point? am I missing something painfully obvious?

You need to understand the binary code of moisture vaporators. Do you also speak bocce?
Oh, and what's your opinion of the singularity
"No"

 

Offline Bryan See

  • Has anyone really been far as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
  • 210
  • Trying to redeem, but under Tiger Parents
    • Skype
    • Steam
Re: Why Tatooine is plausible: the orbital mechanics of binary star systems
The singularity is a one-dimensional point which contains infinite mass in an infinitely small space, where gravity become infinite and space-time curves infinitely, and where the laws of physics as we know them cease to operate. The singularity is at the center of the black hole, beyond the event horizon.

FreeSpace and Star Wars science, in terms of astronomy, is plausible. While the Tatooine star system is common, planets orbiting closely around the stars have been observed.
Bryan See - My FreeSpace Wiki User Page (Talk, Contributions)

Full Projects:
The Shattered Stars: A Deepness Within (Unreal Engine game project, IMDB)

Campaigns:
Lost in the Mist - Cyrene vs. Psamtik
FreeSpace: Reunited

Ships:
GTS Hygeia, GTT Argo, SC Raguel

Tools:
FSO TC/Game template

I've been under attack by Tiger Parents like Jennifer Pan...

 

Offline deathfun

  • 210
  • Hey man. Peace. *Car hits them* Frakking hippies
Re: Why Tatooine is plausible: the orbital mechanics of binary star systems
The singularity is a one-dimensional point which contains infinite mass in an infinitely small space, where gravity become infinite and space-time curves infinitely, and where the laws of physics as we know them cease to operate. The singularity is at the center of the black hole, beyond the event horizon.

Not that singularity, but THE SINGULARITY ENGIIIIIIIIIIIIIINE
https://youtu.be/gI8aSJBC9u0?t=15m54s

And the corresponding reference question
https://youtu.be/Lu9dUG3_KNA?t=12m
"No"

 

Offline watsisname

Re: Why Tatooine is plausible: the orbital mechanics of binary star systems
Quote
The singularity is a one-dimensional point which contains infinite mass in an infinitely small space

Finite mass.  Otherwise the horizon would be infinitely big!  :eek2:
In my world of sleepers, everything will be erased.
I'll be your religion, your only endless ideal.
Slowly we crawl in the dark.
Swallowed by the seductive night.

 

Offline Mongoose

  • Rikki-Tikki-Tavi
  • Global Moderator
  • 212
  • This brain for rent.
    • Steam
    • Something
Re: Why Tatooine is plausible: the orbital mechanics of binary star systems
Exactly.  If you swapped out the Sun for a 1-solar-mass black hole, absolutely nothing would change about the Earth's orbit.

...and then we'd all freeze to death in about 9 minutes. :nervous:

 

Offline qwadtep

  • 28
Re: Why Tatooine is plausible: the orbital mechanics of binary star systems
FreeSpace...in terms of astronomy, is plausible.
Well, except for Capella having several large planets within less than 0.1 AU, more than half of which is occupied by the star itself.

...and then we'd all freeze to death in about 9 minutes. :nervous:
Think of it as free cryogenic stasis. Just don't forget to set your alarm clock for 10^67 years or so, before Hawking radiation makes things too toasty again. And, uh, gamma-y.