Originally posted by CP5670
In other words, your assertion that you "know the game inside out" is false. This has nothing to do with the pointlessness of the fact, and you are only bringing up that issue to mask your previous statement.
I said I typo'd damnit, wake up.
That's what I am saying; there are quite a few more people around than just the two of you. I don't have time to read the whole thing right now, but here is what I observed: when I sort of became inactive, the division was a bit on the dead side, but there were still four or five people playing. When I returned, there were ten or so, and so things seem to have come back up. It is possible that you are completely right, but given your boasting in this thread, it is equally possible that it actually did not turn out that way.
In the European league, up until BD and I retired, the only two people who had flown matchs, apart from Fahd were BD and I.
We were in there to recover the locked nodes, and matchs, we did that, that was our only objective, along the way, we played, and beat, everyone.
Where did I say that? In fact, I said that you are not good enough, because you don't know about story plausibility. Learn to read.
I do, point is kiddo, the story isn't interactive enough considering the stunts we pull of CAN BE DONE, Therefore, they lack the plausibility to cater for the needs of those better then your own, just because you're alright in your little bubble, doesn't mean the programmers shouldn't find ways to do better for those with greater talents.
how can it be better if it's perfect? I have no clue what you are saying here.
I was refering to the human condition.
Not science.
Once, again, show where I said that. This is simply not a discussion on talent; it is a comparison between games, and thus nobody cares about skills here.
Talent was brought into it when people said 'the missiles don't work...uh buh buh...' and 'primaries are useless..wahhhh' for the two games, this is because THEY do NOT know how to use them properly, more fool you if you believe it's any different. This is why Skill matters.
slightly? I could almost always get double the kills when I was hosting since the primaries actually worked correctly.
There is VERY LITTLE difference between the way bd or I play on or off our hosts, apart from on our hosts (me especially) we're a little more lazy. This comment PROVES You really don't know how to play the multi, ok? Hush now.
Perhaps you are. Like I said, my observations were taken over a year ago.
I could write for hours on this comment, we developed a skill scale, in PXO, to help assist in our training, we eventually had to re-write it completely, when we discovered that there is a whole new level above the 'previous aces', such that, the top skill level of dark/sleeper are about 1/5 of what ours are/were, and I'm simply guessing at that figure (generously for dark..)
Yes, and the results of these "better insights" are such far-reaching conclusions as "beams are homo."
Would you prefer a full blown essay on how most beams are not dodgable by the skill of the player, which is what makes them completely against the concept of gaming in a nutshell, THIS ISNT A FILM, it's a game. I wouldn't mind so much if the first beam was unavoidable but the rest not, the others are simply reliant on tbl values and that is pathetic.
They do not give any insights that are relevant to the comparison of two games, which is the subject matter here. Relevant to the comparison of certain ships/weapons/etc., sure, but not the games themselves.
What do you think a game is?
Besides, I think BD and I ORIGINALLY Began discussing the STORYLINE, not the ships/weapons, that was brought on as a defence of the FS2 side of the (well I would call it a debate but one side is being over aggressive and the other being stupid, the middle ground being the only one not looking like an idiot for various reasons) argument...
These are the clear-cut fillers; there are a number of others which are debatable, but here are those I can think of:
sm1-02a.fsm
sm1-08a.fsm
sm2-01a.fsm
sm2-02a.fsm
sm2-03a.fsm
sm2-04a.fsm
sm2-08a.fsm
NAMES?!
I ain't lookin that up.
resists the get a life commentary...even more then throughout the rest of the last couple of posts...
That is not to say that filler missions are bad - quite the contrary, in terms of gameplay, they are sometimes superior to the story advancement missions - but FS2 was able to merge the two types together into single missions much better than FS1. (FS1 had more missions that clearly lie in either category, while most FS2 missions had some of both) [/B]
Errrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr, Merge'em ehh? and bring out stuff like Stealth...lol, oh dear, tag test too...lol
I called stealth a filler because there is no real point to it in my mind, admittedly it intro's stealth but gyah, you know, it'd be better if it wasn't so boring, there's two main tactics open there, A) Follow'em around and shoot'em up, or B) Camp by the ship 'n' use MS... lol, anyone managed to keep the cruiser alive for a while?
Kara, you could make the campaigns have extra routes like FS2 should have and then make the success of one mission lead to a harder one, that would be nice
I have debated the reasons for the supernova before.....
on the VBB, maybe on here, and in person, I also wrote the start of a campaign on it, would be a damn good one, even for those 'elite pilots' because it's meant to be damn tough, and it's an engaging storyline, the biggest problem with it, was that I adapted it from a fanfic I wrote about FS1 a VERY long time ago, so it's very much based on the super duper alpha one thing you think is poor
(although 'alpha one' is now a wing of four super elite wingmen controlled by ai and with survival thingy's in their SEXP's, the other problem was it was meant to be an end of freespace... the whole ending meaning the death of the shivans, could easily come in after BWO...
Stun - knowing Hitpoints is fine, but what the heck is that gonna do for you if you're against someone in a mk1 who could kill your Seraphim or whatever you wanted to be in that was insanely powerful compared to theirs?