Originally posted by Lonestar
So we need music to suck sometimes in order for it to get better....
But not every band/artist does something to expand their genre. The Neptunes, as producers, have done a lot for pop - look at Justin or Britney - and some acts can put out a song that defines their genre ie S Club 7 made a good pop tune in "dont stop moving". But some/most (depending on genre)
dont. They put out sub-standard songs just to get cash for their record company. They dont try anything new, or even do ordinary things well.
I agree the world needs some "average" bands to fill the void on radio playlists, but people making weak music with intrest only in money, not quality tunes, should be working in Mcdonalds.
With respect to the whole pop-punk thing, I'm glad my whole generation (being 18 years old) just missed out on it. Where I come from atleast, all the nu-metal kids are a couple of years younger - their all a bunch of skaters/stoners/wasters. People my age are much more into quality indie and the new-rock revolution. There's a lot of good bands coming out at the moment that seem to being doing much better in the UK than in America (where a lot of them are from), because there's a good sized crowd looking for something that rocks but doesnt shovel dr4m4 angst up its own ass (
see metal, metallica). Check out bands like The Killers, The Von Bondies, The Rapture, Franz Ferdinand, Eastern Lane, The Zutons, Hundred Reasons, The Libertines, and The Vines.